Sensitivity to an Illusion of Sound Location in Human Auditory Cortex.

Nathan C Higgins, Susan A McLaughlin, Sandra Da Costa, G Christopher Stecker
Author Information
  1. Nathan C Higgins: Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University School of MedicineNashville, TN, United States.
  2. Susan A McLaughlin: Institute for Learning and Brain Sciences, University of WashingtonSeattle, WA, United States.
  3. Sandra Da Costa: Biomedical Imaging Research Center (CIBM), School of Basic Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneLausanne, Switzerland.
  4. G Christopher Stecker: Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University School of MedicineNashville, TN, United States.

Abstract

Human listeners place greater weight on the beginning of a sound compared to the middle or end when determining sound location, creating an auditory illusion known as the Franssen effect. Here, we exploited that effect to test whether human auditory cortex (AC) represents the physical vs. perceived spatial features of a sound. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to measure AC responses to sounds that varied in perceived location due to interaural level differences (ILD) applied to sound onsets or to the full sound duration. Analysis of hemodynamic responses in AC revealed sensitivity to ILD in both full-cue (veridical) and onset-only (illusory) lateralized stimuli. Classification analysis revealed regional differences in the sensitivity to onset-only ILDs, where better classification was observed in posterior compared to primary AC. That is, restricting the ILD to sound onset-which alters the physical but not the perceptual nature of the spatial cue-did not eliminate cortical sensitivity to that cue. These results suggest that perceptual representations of auditory space emerge or are refined in higher-order AC regions, supporting the stable perception of auditory space in noisy or reverberant environments and forming the basis of illusions such as the Franssen effect.

Keywords

References

  1. J Neurosci. 2013 Dec 11;33(50):19451-69 [PMID: 24336712]
  2. Science. 2001 Apr 13;292(5515):290-3 [PMID: 11303104]
  3. Hear Res. 2002 Aug;170(1-2):166-78 [PMID: 12208550]
  4. Hear Res. 1981 Jul;4(3-4):299-307 [PMID: 7263517]
  5. Neuroimage. 2004;23 Suppl 1:S208-19 [PMID: 15501092]
  6. Front Neurosci. 2014 Aug 11;8:240 [PMID: 25157216]
  7. Nat Neurosci. 2008 May;11(5):609-16 [PMID: 18408717]
  8. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Jun;125(6):3914-24 [PMID: 19507974]
  9. Front Psychol. 2010 Dec 24;1:232 [PMID: 21738513]
  10. Brain Res. 2006 Aug 23;1106(1):164-76 [PMID: 16831407]
  11. J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Apr;23(4):1003-14 [PMID: 20350060]
  12. Neuroimage. 2001 Oct;14(4):802-16 [PMID: 11554799]
  13. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Jul;128(1):332-41 [PMID: 20649228]
  14. Neuroimage. 2008 Oct 15;43(1):44-58 [PMID: 18672070]
  15. Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Sep 22;281(1791):20141000 [PMID: 25100695]
  16. Neuroimage. 2007 May 1;35(4):1480-94 [PMID: 17376705]
  17. Neuroimage. 2006 Jul 1;31(3):968-80 [PMID: 16530430]
  18. Nat Neurosci. 2006 Mar;9(3):429-34 [PMID: 16462737]
  19. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004 Nov;5(11):887-92 [PMID: 15496866]
  20. Front Neurosci. 2015 Apr 20;9:132 [PMID: 25941469]
  21. Nat Neurosci. 2009 Jun;12(6):718-24 [PMID: 19471271]
  22. J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Sep;132(3):1573-80 [PMID: 22978886]
  23. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 May;127(5):3092-103 [PMID: 21117758]
  24. Eur J Neurosci. 2013 Oct;38(7):3056-70 [PMID: 23899307]
  25. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Aug;134(2):1242-52 [PMID: 23927122]
  26. J Acoust Soc Am. 1989 Oct;86(4):1366-73 [PMID: 2808910]
  27. Curr Biol. 2015 Aug 3;25(15):1982-7 [PMID: 26144967]
  28. Nat Neurosci. 2010 Nov;13(11):1428-32 [PMID: 20890293]
  29. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2016 Feb;17 (1):37-53 [PMID: 26466943]
  30. Neuroimage. 2016 May 15;132:32-42 [PMID: 26899782]
  31. J Neurosci. 2003 Jul 2;23(13):5799-804 [PMID: 12843284]
  32. Neuroimage. 2015 Oct 15;120:456-66 [PMID: 26163805]
  33. Neuroimage. 1999 Apr;9(4):416-29 [PMID: 10191170]

Grants

  1. R01 DC011548/NIDCD NIH HHS
  2. R03 DC009482/NIDCD NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0auditorysoundACeffectspatialILDsensitivityHumancomparedlocationillusionFranssencortexphysicalperceivedfMRIresponsesdifferencesrevealedonset-onlyperceptualspaceperceptionlistenersplacegreaterweightbeginningmiddleenddeterminingcreatingknownexploitedtestwhetherhumanrepresentsvsfeaturesusedfunctionalmagneticresonanceimagingmeasuresoundsvarieddueinteraurallevelappliedonsetsfulldurationAnalysishemodynamicfull-cueveridicalillusorylateralizedstimuliClassificationanalysisregionalILDsbetterclassificationobservedposteriorprimaryrestrictingonset-whichaltersnaturecue-dideliminatecorticalcueresultssuggestrepresentationsemergerefinedhigher-orderregionssupportingstablenoisyreverberantenvironmentsformingbasisillusionsSensitivityIllusionSoundLocationAuditoryCortexbinauralhearingneuroimaginglocalization

Similar Articles

Cited By