Detection of tuberculosis drug resistance: a comparison by Mycobacterium tuberculosis MLPA assay versus Genotype®MTBDRplus.

Paula Fernanda Gonçalves Dos Santos, Elis Regina Dalla Costa, Daniela M Ramalho, Maria Lucia Rossetti, Regina Bones Barcellos, Luciana de Souza Nunes, Leonardo Souza Esteves, Rodrigo Rodenbusch, Richard M Anthony, Indra Bergval, Sarah Sengstake, Miguel Viveiros, Afrânio Kritski, Martha M Oliveira
Author Information
  1. Paula Fernanda Gonçalves Dos Santos: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Faculdade de Medicina, Programa Acadêmico de Tuberculose, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Clínica Médica, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
  2. Elis Regina Dalla Costa: Fundação Estadual de Produção e Pesquisa em Saúde, Centro de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
  3. Daniela M Ramalho: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Faculdade de Medicina, Programa Acadêmico de Tuberculose, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Clínica Médica, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
  4. Maria Lucia Rossetti: Fundação Estadual de Produção e Pesquisa em Saúde, Centro de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
  5. Regina Bones Barcellos: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Faculdade de Medicina, Programa Acadêmico de Tuberculose, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Clínica Médica, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
  6. Luciana de Souza Nunes: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Centro de Biotecnologia, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Celular e Molecular, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
  7. Leonardo Souza Esteves: Fundação Estadual de Produção e Pesquisa em Saúde, Centro de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
  8. Rodrigo Rodenbusch: Fundação Estadual de Produção e Pesquisa em Saúde, Centro de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
  9. Richard M Anthony: Royal Tropical Institute, KIT Biomedical Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  10. Indra Bergval: Royal Tropical Institute, KIT Biomedical Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  11. Sarah Sengstake: Royal Tropical Institute, KIT Biomedical Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  12. Miguel Viveiros: Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, Unidade de Microbiologia Médica, Global Health and Tropical Medicine, Lisboa, Portugal.
  13. Afrânio Kritski: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Faculdade de Medicina, Programa Acadêmico de Tuberculose, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Clínica Médica, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
  14. Martha M Oliveira: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Faculdade de Medicina, Programa Acadêmico de Tuberculose, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Clínica Médica, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To cope with the emergence of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), new molecular methods that can routinely be used to screen for a wide range of drug resistance related genetic markers in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis genome are urgently needed.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of multiplex ligaton-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) against Genotype® MTBDRplus to detect resistance to isoniazid (INHr) and rifampicin (RIFr).
METHOD: 96 culture isolates characterised for identification, drug susceptibility testing (DST) and sequencing of rpoB, katG, and inhA genes were evaluated by the MLPA and Genotype®MTBDRplus assays.
RESULTS: With sequencing as a reference standard, sensitivity (SE) to detect INHr was 92.8% and 85.7%, and specificity (SP) was 100% and 97.5%, for MLPA and Genotype®MTBDRplus, respectively. In relation to RIFr, SE was 87.5% and 100%, and SP was 100% and 98.8%, respectively. Kappa value was identical between Genotype®MTBDRplus and MLPA compared with the standard DST and sequencing for detection of INHr [0.83 (0.75-0.91)] and RIFr [0.93 (0.88-0.98)].
CONCLUSION: Compared to Genotype®MTBDRplus, MLPA showed similar sensitivity to detect INH and RIF resistance. The results obtained by the MLPA and Genotype®MTBDRplus assays indicate that both molecular tests can be used for the rapid detection of drug-resistant TB with high accuracy. MLPA has the added value of providing information on the circulating M. tuberculosis lineages.

References

  1. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015 Mar;70(3):686-96 [PMID: 25587993]
  2. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997 Aug;41(8):1677-81 [PMID: 9257740]
  3. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2015 Aug;19(8):954-9 [PMID: 26162362]
  4. BMC Genomics. 2014 Jul 07;15:572 [PMID: 25001491]
  5. Infect Genet Evol. 2016 Apr;39:187-93 [PMID: 26825253]
  6. J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Apr;50(4):1264-9 [PMID: 22301019]
  7. J Clin Microbiol. 2013 May;51(5):1606-8 [PMID: 23467605]
  8. BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Oct 24;14:548 [PMID: 25338623]
  9. J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Nov;51(11):3527-34 [PMID: 23966495]
  10. BMC Clin Pathol. 2009 Mar 10;9:2 [PMID: 19284561]
  11. Infect Genet Evol. 2012 Jun;12(4):649-56 [PMID: 21907830]
  12. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2002 Aug;21(8):596-602 [PMID: 12226690]
  13. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2014 Jun;109 (3):307-14 [PMID: 24821057]
  14. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2012 Jan;92 (1):56-9 [PMID: 22001593]
  15. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 Jun 15;30(12 ):e57 [PMID: 12060695]
  16. Methods Enzymol. 1994;235:196-205 [PMID: 8057895]
  17. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004 Sep;10(9):1568-77 [PMID: 15498158]
  18. J Bras Pneumol. 2014 Mar-Apr;40(2):155-63 [PMID: 24831400]
  19. BMC Microbiol. 2009 Feb 19;9:39 [PMID: 19228426]
  20. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 21;(1):CD009593 [PMID: 24448973]
  21. Bull World Health Organ. 1969;41(1):21-43 [PMID: 5309084]
  22. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43240 [PMID: 22916230]
  23. J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Feb;46(2):689-99 [PMID: 18077627]
  24. J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Nov;47(11):3501-6 [PMID: 19759221]
  25. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2015 Jul;19(7):828-33 [PMID: 26056110]
  26. Infect Genet Evol. 2012 Jun;12(4):755-66 [PMID: 22365971]
  27. J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Dec;53(12):3805-11 [PMID: 26400784]
  28. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2012 Jul;16(7):860-70 [PMID: 22687497]

MeSH Term

Antibiotics, Antitubercular
DNA, Bacterial
Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial
Genotype
Humans
Isoniazid
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Phenotype
Rifampin
Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant

Chemicals

Antibiotics, Antitubercular
DNA, Bacterial
Isoniazid
Rifampin

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0MLPAGenotype®MTBDRplustuberculosisdrugresistancedetectINHrRIFrsequencing100%molecularcanusedMycobacteriumDSTassaysstandardsensitivitySE8%SP5%respectively98valuedetection[00]BACKGROUND:copeemergencemultidrug-resistantMDR-TBnewmethodsroutinelyscreenwiderangerelatedgeneticmarkersgenomeurgentlyneededOBJECTIVE:evaluateperformancemultiplexligaton-dependentprobeamplificationGenotype®MTBDRplusisoniazidrifampicinMETHOD:96cultureisolatescharacterisedidentificationsusceptibilitytestingrpoBkatGinhAgenesevaluatedRESULTS:reference92857%specificity97relation87Kappaidenticalcompared8375-0919388-0CONCLUSION:ComparedshowedsimilarINHRIFresultsobtainedindicatetestsrapiddrug-resistantTBhighaccuracyaddedprovidinginformationcirculatingMlineagesDetectionresistance:comparisonassayversus

Similar Articles

Cited By (2)