Multichannel myopic deconvolution in underwater acoustic channels via low-rank recovery.

Ning Tian, Sung-Hoon Byun, Karim Sabra, Justin Romberg
Author Information
  1. Ning Tian: School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, North Avenue, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA.
  2. Sung-Hoon Byun: Korea Research Institute of Ships and Ocean Engineering, 32 1312beon-gil Yuseong-daero, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 34103, Korea.
  3. Karim Sabra: George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, North Avenue, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA.
  4. Justin Romberg: School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, North Avenue, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA.

Abstract

This paper presents a technique for solving the multichannel blind deconvolution problem. The authors observe the convolution of a single (unknown) source with K different (unknown) channel responses; from these channel outputs, the authors want to estimate both the source and the channel responses. The authors show how this classical signal processing problem can be viewed as solving a system of bilinear equations, and in turn can be recast as recovering a rank-1 matrix from a set of linear observations. Results of prior studies in the area of low-rank matrix recovery have identified effective convex relaxations for problems of this type and efficient, scalable heuristic solvers that enable these techniques to work with thousands of unknown variables. The authors show how a priori information about the channels can be used to build a linear model for the channels, which in turn makes solving these systems of equations well-posed. This study demonstrates the robustness of this methodology to measurement noises and parametrization errors of the channel impulse responses with several stylized and shallow water acoustic channel simulations. The performance of this methodology is also verified experimentally using shipping noise recorded on short bottom-mounted vertical line arrays.

References

  1. J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Aug;132(2):883-93 [PMID: 22894211]
  2. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Feb;127(2):EL42-7 [PMID: 20136177]
  3. J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Nov;132(5):3018-29 [PMID: 23145588]
  4. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 May;107(5 Pt 1):2576-85 [PMID: 10830381]
  5. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2009 Jul;18(7):1487-500 [PMID: 19447713]
  6. IEEE Trans Image Process. 1999;8(2):202-19 [PMID: 18267468]
  7. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Oct;114(4 Pt 1):1988-96 [PMID: 14587599]
  8. J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Apr;131(4):2599-610 [PMID: 22501041]
  9. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Feb;107(2):885-93 [PMID: 10687698]
  10. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Feb;133(2):EL108-13 [PMID: 23363189]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0channelauthorssolvingunknownresponsescanchannelsdeconvolutionproblemsourceshowequationsturnmatrixlinearlow-rankrecoverymethodologyacousticpaperpresentstechniquemultichannelblindobserveconvolutionsingleKdifferentoutputswantestimateclassicalsignalprocessingviewedsystembilinearrecastrecoveringrank-1setobservationsResultspriorstudiesareaidentifiedeffectiveconvexrelaxationsproblemstypeefficientscalableheuristicsolversenabletechniquesworkthousandsvariablesprioriinformationusedbuildmodelmakessystemswell-posedstudydemonstratesrobustnessmeasurementnoisesparametrizationerrorsimpulseseveralstylizedshallowwatersimulationsperformancealsoverifiedexperimentallyusingshippingnoiserecordedshortbottom-mountedverticallinearraysMultichannelmyopicunderwatervia

Similar Articles

Cited By