Determining if wearable sensors affect infant leg movement frequency.

Crystal Jiang, Christianne J Lane, Emily Perkins, Derek Schiesel, Beth A Smith
Author Information
  1. Crystal Jiang: a Division of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy , University of Southern California , Los Angeles , CA , USA.
  2. Christianne J Lane: b Department of Preventative Medicine , University of Southern California , Los Angeles , CA , USA.
  3. Emily Perkins: a Division of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy , University of Southern California , Los Angeles , CA , USA.
  4. Derek Schiesel: a Division of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy , University of Southern California , Los Angeles , CA , USA.
  5. Beth A Smith: a Division of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy , University of Southern California , Los Angeles , CA , USA.

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is interest in using wearable sensors to measure infant leg movement patterns; however, they were not developed for infant use and their presence may adversely affect infant movement production. Their weight may discourage leg movement production, or their presence may annoy an infant and encourage higher rates of leg movement production. Our purpose was to determine whether wearable sensors affected the frequency of infant leg movements produced.
METHOD: We included 10 infants with typical development and 10 infants at risk of developmental delay, between 2 and 10 months' chronological age.
RESULTS: After collecting and analyzing video recordings of infants, we found a negligible difference between the numbers of spontaneous leg movements made while infants wore sensors, compared to those without sensors.
CONCLUSIONS: Wearable sensors have a negligible effect on the frequency of infant leg movement production, supporting their use in infant movement analysis.

Keywords

References

  1. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2016 Fall;28(3):304-10 [PMID: 27341579]
  2. Motor Control. 2002 Jan;6(1):52-68 [PMID: 11842270]
  3. Infant Behav Dev. 2010 Feb;33(1):16-22 [PMID: 19959239]
  4. Sensors (Basel). 2015 Aug 04;15(8):19006-20 [PMID: 26247951]
  5. Infant Behav Dev. 2006 Apr;29(2):153-68 [PMID: 17138271]
  6. Biol Res Nurs. 2004 Oct;6(2):151-7 [PMID: 15388912]
  7. Front Psychol. 2014 Aug 12;5:771 [PMID: 25161629]

Grants

  1. K12 HD055929/NICHD NIH HHS
  2. UL1 TR000130/NCATS NIH HHS
  3. UL1 TR001855/NCATS NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Child Development
Female
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Leg
Male
Movement
Neurologic Examination
Video Recording
Wearable Electronic Devices

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0movementinfantlegsensorswearableproductioninfantsmayfrequencyusepresenceaffectmovements10negligiblePURPOSE:interestusingmeasurepatternshoweverdevelopedadverselyweightdiscourageannoyencouragehigherratespurposedeterminewhetheraffectedproducedMETHOD:includedtypicaldevelopmentriskdevelopmentaldelay210 months'chronologicalageRESULTS:collectinganalyzingvideorecordingsfounddifferencenumbersspontaneousmadeworecomparedwithoutCONCLUSIONS:WearableeffectsupportinganalysisDeterminingInfantsystemsensor

Similar Articles

Cited By