Identification and validation of reference genes for qRT-PCR studies of the obligate aphid pathogenic fungus Pandora neoaphidis during different developmental stages.

Shutao Zhang, Chun Chen, Tingna Xie, Sudan Ye
Author Information
  1. Shutao Zhang: China Jiliang University, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Biometrology and Inspection & Quarantine, Hangzhou, China.
  2. Chun Chen: China Jiliang University, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Biometrology and Inspection & Quarantine, Hangzhou, China. ORCID
  3. Tingna Xie: China Jiliang University, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Biometrology and Inspection & Quarantine, Hangzhou, China.
  4. Sudan Ye: Zhejiang Economic & Trade Polytechnic, Hangzhou, China.

Abstract

The selection of stable reference genes is a critical step for the accurate quantification of gene expression. To identify and validate the reference genes in Pandora neoaphidis-an obligate aphid pathogenic fungus-the expression of 13classical candidate reference genes were evaluated by quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction(qPCR) at four developmental stages (conidia, conidia with germ tubes, short hyphae and elongated hyphae). Four statistical algorithms, including geNorm, NormFinder, BestKeeper and Delta Ct method were used to rank putative reference genes according to their expression stability and indicate the best reference gene or combination of reference genes for accurate normalization. The analysis of comprehensive ranking revealed that ACT1and 18Swas the most stably expressed genes throughout the developmental stages. To further validate the suitability of the reference genes identified in this study, the expression of cell division control protein 25 (CDC25) and Chitinase 1(CHI1) genes were used to further confirm the validated candidate reference genes. Our study presented the first systematic study of reference gene(s) selection for P. neoaphidis study and provided guidelines to obtain more accurate qPCR results for future developmental efforts.

References

  1. Mycol Res. 2006 Oct;110(Pt 10):1165-71 [PMID: 17010593]
  2. Mol Biol Rep. 2013 Dec;40(12):6691-9 [PMID: 24057254]
  3. Adv Genet. 2016;94:41-65 [PMID: 27131322]
  4. BMC Mol Biol. 2009 Oct 30;10:99 [PMID: 19874630]
  5. Genome Biol. 2002 Jun 18;3(7):RESEARCH0034 [PMID: 12184808]
  6. Methods. 2001 Dec;25(4):402-8 [PMID: 11846609]
  7. Virol J. 2011 Jun 16;8:308 [PMID: 21679431]
  8. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2014 Jul;356(1):97-104 [PMID: 24953133]
  9. Fungal Biol. 2011 Sep;115(9):891-901 [PMID: 21872186]
  10. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Jan;76(1):254-63 [PMID: 19854926]
  11. BMC Genomics. 2014 Aug 04;15:648 [PMID: 25091330]
  12. Mol Plant Pathol. 2010 Nov;11(6):805-16 [PMID: 21029324]
  13. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011 Oct 7;413(4):537-40 [PMID: 21925148]
  14. Genetics. 2007 Feb;175(2):477-85 [PMID: 17322354]
  15. Biotechnol Lett. 2004 Mar;26(6):509-15 [PMID: 15127793]
  16. Braz J Microbiol. 2016 Jan-Mar;47(1):259-65 [PMID: 26887253]
  17. BMC Mol Biol. 2009 Oct 09;10:94 [PMID: 19818117]
  18. BMC Mol Biol. 2010 Sep 20;11:73 [PMID: 20854682]
  19. Fungal Genet Biol. 2011 Apr;48(4):343-52 [PMID: 21156213]
  20. J Mol Endocrinol. 2005 Jun;34(3):597-601 [PMID: 15956331]
  21. Anal Biochem. 2005 Sep 1;344(1):141-3 [PMID: 16054107]
  22. J Exp Bot. 2009;60(2):487-93 [PMID: 19264760]
  23. Exp Hematol. 2002 Jun;30(6):503-12 [PMID: 12063017]
  24. BMC Genomics. 2011 Jan 17;12:38 [PMID: 21241472]
  25. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43028 [PMID: 22916200]
  26. BMC Mol Biol. 2006 Aug 04;7:25 [PMID: 16889665]
  27. Plant Mol Biol. 2012 Jan 31;:null [PMID: 22290409]
  28. BMC Mol Biol. 2006 Oct 06;7:33 [PMID: 17026756]
  29. Cancer Res. 2004 Aug 1;64(15):5245-50 [PMID: 15289330]
  30. Environ Microbiol. 2006 Jan;8(1):69-76 [PMID: 16343323]
  31. BMC Genomics. 2015 Feb 14;16:71 [PMID: 25757610]

MeSH Term

Animals
Aphids
Entomophthorales
Genes, Fungal
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
Reference Standards

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0referencegenesexpressiondevelopmentalstudyaccurategenestagesselectionvalidatePandoraobligateaphidpathogeniccandidateqPCRconidiahyphaeusedneoaphidisstablecriticalstepquantificationidentifyneoaphidis-anfungus-the13classicalevaluatedquantitativereal-timereversetranscriptasepolymerasechainreactionfourgermtubesshortelongatedFourstatisticalalgorithmsincludinggeNormNormFinderBestKeeperDeltaCtmethodrankputativeaccordingstabilityindicatebestcombinationnormalizationanalysiscomprehensiverankingrevealedACT1and18Swasstablyexpressedthroughoutsuitabilityidentifiedcelldivisioncontrolprotein25CDC25Chitinase1CHI1confirmvalidatedpresentedfirstsystematicsPprovidedguidelinesobtainresultsfutureeffortsIdentificationvalidationqRT-PCRstudiesfungusdifferent

Similar Articles

Cited By