Cooperative interactions within the family enhance the capacity for evolutionary change in body size.

Benjamin Jm Jarrett, Matthew Schrader, Darren Rebar, Thomas M Houslay, Rebecca M Kilner
Author Information
  1. Benjamin Jm Jarrett: Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ.
  2. Matthew Schrader: Department of Biology, The University of the South, Sewanee, TN 37383.
  3. Darren Rebar: Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ.
  4. Thomas M Houslay: Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter (Penryn Campus), Cornwall, TR10 9FE.
  5. Rebecca M Kilner: Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ.

Abstract

Classical models of evolution seldom predict the rate at which populations evolve in the wild. One explanation is that the social environment affects how traits change in response to natural selection. Here, we determine how social interactions between parents and offspring, and among larvae, influence the response to experimental selection on adult size. Our experiments focus on burying beetles (), whose larvae develop within a carrion nest. Some broods exclusively self-feed on the carrion while others are also fed by their parents. We found populations responded to selection for larger adults but only when parents cared for their offspring. We also found populations responded to selection for smaller adults too, but only by removing parents and causing larval interactions to exert more influence on eventual adult size. Comparative analyses revealed a similar pattern: evolutionary increases in species size within the genus are associated with the obligate provision of care. Synthesising our results with previous studies, we suggest that cooperative social environments enhance the response to selection whereas excessive conflict can prevent further directional selection.

References

  1. Genetica. 2001;112-113:199-222 [PMID: 11838766]
  2. Evolution. 2002 Jan;56(1):96-110 [PMID: 11913669]
  3. Bioinformatics. 2004 Jan 22;20(2):289-90 [PMID: 14734327]
  4. Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Jan 7;271(1534):75-9 [PMID: 15002774]
  5. Annu Rev Entomol. 1998;43:595-618 [PMID: 15012399]
  6. Am Nat. 2004 Jul;164(1):13-24 [PMID: 15266367]
  7. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006 Aug;4(8):597-607 [PMID: 16845430]
  8. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2006 Aug;9(4):490-5 [PMID: 16899155]
  9. Genetics. 2008 Mar;178(3):1559-70 [PMID: 18245326]
  10. J Evol Biol. 2008 May;21(3):647-50 [PMID: 18266683]
  11. J Evol Biol. 2008 Sep;21(5):1175-88 [PMID: 18547354]
  12. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Nov 12;364(1533):3143-55 [PMID: 19805423]
  13. Evolution. 2010 Sep;64(9):2558-74 [PMID: 20394666]
  14. Bioinformatics. 2010 Jun 1;26(11):1463-4 [PMID: 20395285]
  15. J Evol Biol. 2011 Apr;24(4):772-83 [PMID: 21288272]
  16. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31713 [PMID: 22355390]
  17. Heredity (Edinb). 2014 Jan;112(1):61-9 [PMID: 23512010]
  18. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2013 Dec;69(3):552-65 [PMID: 23911726]
  19. Genet Res. 1990 Jun;55(3):189-97 [PMID: 2394377]
  20. Evolution. 2014 Oct;68(10):3039-46 [PMID: 24916074]
  21. Science. 2014 Oct 17;346(6207):1245993 [PMID: 25213376]
  22. Evol Appl. 2010 Sep;3(5-6):453-65 [PMID: 25567938]
  23. Evolution. 2015 Apr;69(4):1077-84 [PMID: 25648525]
  24. Am Nat. 2015 May;185(5):610-9 [PMID: 25905504]
  25. Ecol Evol. 2015 Dec 29;6(1):329-36 [PMID: 26811796]
  26. Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 05;6:29323 [PMID: 27378180]
  27. Evolution. 1989 May;43(3):485-503 [PMID: 28568400]
  28. Evolution. 1997 Oct;51(5):1352-1362 [PMID: 28568644]
  29. Am Nat. 1999 Mar;153(3):254-266 [PMID: 29585974]
  30. Anim Behav. 1998 Jan;55(1):97-107 [PMID: 9480676]

Grants

  1. 310785/European Research Council

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0selectionparentssizepopulationssocialresponseinteractionswithinchangeoffspringlarvaeinfluenceadultcarrionalsofoundrespondedadultsevolutionaryenhanceClassicalmodelsevolutionseldompredictrateevolvewildOneexplanationenvironmentaffectstraitsnaturaldetermineamongexperimentalexperimentsfocusburyingbeetleswhosedevelopnestbroodsexclusivelyself-feedothersfedlargercaredsmallerremovingcausinglarvalexerteventualComparativeanalysesrevealedsimilarpattern:increasesspeciesgenusassociatedobligateprovisioncareSynthesisingresultspreviousstudiessuggestcooperativeenvironmentswhereasexcessiveconflictcanpreventdirectionalCooperativefamilycapacitybody

Similar Articles

Cited By (17)