Individual, contextual and network characteristics of blood donors and non-donors: a systematic review of recent literature.

Tjeerd W Piersma, René Bekkers, Elisabeth F Klinkenberg, Wim L A M De Kort, Eva-Maria Merz
Author Information
  1. Tjeerd W Piersma: Department of Donor Studies, Sanquin Research, Vrije Universiteit, the Netherlands.
  2. René Bekkers: Centre for Philanthropic Studies, Vrije Universiteit, the Netherlands.
  3. Elisabeth F Klinkenberg: Department of Donor Studies, Sanquin Research, Vrije Universiteit, the Netherlands.
  4. Wim L A M De Kort: Department of Donor Studies, Sanquin Research, Vrije Universiteit, the Netherlands.
  5. Eva-Maria Merz: Department of Donor Studies, Sanquin Research, Vrije Universiteit, the Netherlands.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ageing population and recent migration flows may negatively affect the blood supply in the long term, increasing the importance of targeted recruitment and retention strategies to address donors. This review sought to identify individual, network and contextual characteristics related to blood donor status and behaviour, to systematically discuss differences between study results, and to identify possible factors to target in recruitment and retention efforts.
METHODS: The systematic review was conducted in accordance with a predefined PROSPERO protocol (CRD42016039591). After quality assessments by multiple independent raters, a final set of 66 peer-reviewed papers, published between October 2009 and January 2017, were included for review.
RESULTS: Individual and contextual characteristics of blood donor status and behaviour were categorised into five main lines of research: donor demographics, motivations and barriers, adverse reactions and deferral, contextual factors, and blood centre factors. Results on donor demographics, motivations and barriers, and contextual factors were inconclusive, differing between studies, countries, and sample characteristics. Adverse reactions and deferral were negatively related to blood donor behaviour. Blood centre factors play an important role in donor management, e.g., providing information, reminders, and (non-)monetary rewards. No studies were found on network characteristics of (non-)donors.
DISCUSSION: Although individual and contextual characteristics strongly relate to blood donor status and behaviour, mechanisms underlying these relations have not been studied sufficiently. We want to stress the importance of longitudinal studies in donor behaviour, exploring the role of life events and network characteristics within blood donor careers. Increased understanding of donor behaviour will assist policy makers of blood collection agencies, with the ultimate goal of safeguarding a sufficient and matching blood supply.

References

  1. Transfus Med Rev. 2011 Oct;25(4):317-34 [PMID: 21641767]
  2. Blood Transfus. 2015 Apr;13(2):336-7 [PMID: 25369607]
  3. N Engl J Med. 2011 Dec 29;365(26):2453-62 [PMID: 22168590]
  4. Vox Sang. 2016 Apr;110(3):278-81 [PMID: 26198382]
  5. Transfusion. 2013 Feb;53(2):337-43 [PMID: 22845422]
  6. Soc Sci Med. 2013 Nov;96:86-94 [PMID: 24034955]
  7. Transfusion. 2010 Jul;50(7 Pt 2):1618-24 [PMID: 21175474]
  8. Health Psychol. 2013 Mar;32(3):264-72 [PMID: 22612559]
  9. Blood Transfus. 2014 Jul;12(3):320-9 [PMID: 24887229]
  10. Vox Sang. 2010 Apr;98(3 Pt 1):e219-24 [PMID: 20002621]
  11. Transfusion. 2011 Mar;51(3):539-47 [PMID: 20849410]
  12. Transfusion. 2012 Dec;52(12 ):2570-6 [PMID: 22536827]
  13. Transfusion. 2011 Dec;51(12):2720-6 [PMID: 21658045]
  14. Transfusion. 2011 Jun;51(6):1188-96 [PMID: 21155833]
  15. Transfusion. 2014 Mar;54(3 Pt 2):821-7 [PMID: 24033122]
  16. Transfusion. 2002 Feb;42(2):216-25 [PMID: 11896338]
  17. Transfusion. 2016 Jun;56(6 Pt 2):1654-61 [PMID: 26919164]
  18. Transfusion. 2010 Aug;50(8):1778-86 [PMID: 20456674]
  19. Transfusion. 2017 Jan;57(1):108-114 [PMID: 27774681]
  20. Blood Transfus. 2014 Jan;12 Suppl 1:s28-36 [PMID: 23867173]
  21. Transfusion. 2015 Jan;55(1):91-9 [PMID: 25178387]
  22. Hematology. 2016 Sep;21(8):490-9 [PMID: 26870887]
  23. Transfusion. 2014 Mar;54(3 Pt 2):805-13 [PMID: 23789972]
  24. Blood Transfus. 2014 Jan;12 Suppl 1:s11-20 [PMID: 23245721]
  25. Psychol Health Med. 2011 Dec;16(6):641-9 [PMID: 21678195]
  26. Transfusion. 2015 Sep;55(9):2169-74; quiz 2168 [PMID: 25808722]
  27. Transfus Apher Sci. 2016 Apr;54(2):303-8 [PMID: 26653930]
  28. Transfusion. 2014 Mar;54(3 Pt 2):918-24 [PMID: 23915025]
  29. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57351 [PMID: 23483903]
  30. Transfusion. 2012 Jan;52(1):118-26 [PMID: 21682732]
  31. Transfusion. 2015 Nov;55(11):2645-52 [PMID: 26174157]
  32. Transfusion. 2013 Aug;53(8):1678-86 [PMID: 23278406]
  33. Vox Sang. 2015 Aug;109(2):155-62 [PMID: 25900049]
  34. Transfus Med Rev. 2016 Jan;30(1):1-5 [PMID: 26764124]
  35. Epidemiology. 2007 Nov;18(6):805-35 [PMID: 18049195]
  36. Health Place. 2012 Mar;18(2):424-33 [PMID: 22226381]
  37. Transfusion. 2016 Dec;56(12 ):2995-3003 [PMID: 27667318]
  38. Transfusion. 2012 Oct;52(10):2189-200 [PMID: 22321338]
  39. Health Mark Q. 2014;31(3):197-212 [PMID: 25120042]
  40. Vox Sang. 2016 Apr;110(3):258-65 [PMID: 26529138]
  41. Vox Sang. 2012 Jan;102(1):47-54 [PMID: 21534984]
  42. Transfus Med. 2013 Apr;23(2):77-86 [PMID: 23278937]
  43. Vox Sang. 2010 Apr;98(3 Pt 1):e201-8 [PMID: 20059758]
  44. Eur J Health Econ. 2014 Apr;15(3):313-21 [PMID: 23797489]
  45. J Natl Med Assoc. 2011 Apr;103(4):351-7 [PMID: 21805814]
  46. Transfus Apher Sci. 2012 Oct;47(2):171-7 [PMID: 22854325]
  47. Transfus Med Hemother. 2013 Apr;40(2):133-8 [PMID: 23652647]
  48. Transfusion. 2014 Dec;54(12):3051-60 [PMID: 24912544]
  49. Transfusion. 1976 Mar-Apr;16(2):182-9 [PMID: 1258120]
  50. Transfusion. 2016 Jun;56(6 Pt 2):1628-35 [PMID: 26830372]
  51. Transfusion. 2006 Apr;46(4):545-53 [PMID: 16584430]
  52. J Health Psychol. 2010 Mar;15(2):163-72 [PMID: 20207660]
  53. Transfusion. 2009 Oct;49(10):2229-36 [PMID: 19903284]
  54. Blood Transfus. 2014 Jan;12 Suppl 1:s37-43 [PMID: 23522891]
  55. Transfusion. 2010 Jan;50(1):85-91 [PMID: 19778341]
  56. Vox Sang. 2010 Apr;98(3 Pt 1):e241-8 [PMID: 19807904]
  57. Transfusion. 2008 Apr;48(4):742-8 [PMID: 18194391]
  58. Transfusion. 2012 Sep;52(9):1871-9 [PMID: 22321030]
  59. Vox Sang. 2014 Feb;106(2):118-26 [PMID: 24117697]
  60. Transfus Clin Biol. 2016 May;23 (2):59-63 [PMID: 27068783]
  61. Transfus Med. 2010 Aug 1;20(4):227-36 [PMID: 20210925]
  62. Transfusion. 2011 Feb;51(2):412-20 [PMID: 20804526]
  63. Transfus Apher Sci. 2015 Dec;53(3):320-8 [PMID: 26208786]
  64. Transfusion. 2012 Feb;52(2):343-55 [PMID: 21848847]

MeSH Term

Aging
Blood Donors
Female
Humans
Male
Social Behavior

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0blooddonorcharacteristicscontextualbehaviourfactorsreviewnetworkdonorsstatusstudiesrecentnegativelysupplyimportancerecruitmentretentionidentifyindividualrelatedsystematicIndividualdemographicsmotivationsbarriersreactionsdeferralcentrerolenon-BACKGROUND:ageingpopulationmigrationflowsmayaffectlongtermincreasingtargetedstrategiesaddresssoughtsystematicallydiscussdifferencesstudyresultspossibletargeteffortsMETHODS:conductedaccordancepredefinedPROSPEROprotocolCRD42016039591qualityassessmentsmultipleindependentratersfinalset66peer-reviewedpaperspublishedOctober2009January2017includedRESULTS:categorisedfivemainlinesresearch:adverseResultsinconclusivedifferingcountriessampleAdverseBloodplayimportantmanagementegprovidinginformationremindersmonetaryrewardsfoundDISCUSSION:AlthoughstronglyrelatemechanismsunderlyingrelationsstudiedsufficientlywantstresslongitudinalexploringlifeeventswithincareersIncreasedunderstandingwillassistpolicymakerscollectionagenciesultimategoalsafeguardingsufficientmatchingnon-donors:literature

Similar Articles

Cited By