Toggle navigation
Data Resources
Computing Analysis
Data Network
Standards
OpenLB
Open Library of Bioscience
Search
Advanced Search
Source: PubMed
The international journal of occupational and environmental medicine
07, 2017;8 (3): 186-188.
"Predatory Journals" or "Predatory Scholars?" The Essential Role of the Peer Review Process.
Francesco Chirico
Author Information
Francesco Chirico: Health Service Department, State Police, Ministry of Interiori, Italy. medlavchirico@gmail.com.
PMID: 28689217
DOI: 10.15171/ijoem.2017.1082
Abstract
No abstract text available.
Keywords
Journalism
Peer review
Predatory journals
References
PLoS Med. 2005 Aug;2(8):e124 [PMID:
16060722
]
Emerg (Tehran). 2017;5(1):e49 [PMID:
28286856
]
Nature. 2017 Apr 26;544(7651):416 [PMID:
28447641
]
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e44118 [PMID:
23115617
]
Science. 2013 Oct 4;342(6154):60-5 [PMID:
24092725
]
Int J Occup Environ Med. 2017 Apr;8(2):67-68 [PMID:
28432367
]
J R Soc Med. 2006 Apr;99(4):178-82 [PMID:
16574968
]
PLoS One. 2009 May 29;4(5):e5738 [PMID:
19478950
]
Letter
12
CITATIONS
12
Total citations
2
Recent citations
7.47
Field Citation Ratio
0.25
Relative Citation Ratio
Word Cloud
Created with Highcharts 10.0.0
"Predatory
Peer
Journals"
Scholars?"
Essential
Role
Review
Process
Journalism
review
Predatory
journals
Similar Articles
Cited By