Effects of radiofrequency exposure emitted from a GSM mobile phone on proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis of neural stem cells.

Mahsa Eghlidospour, Amir Ghanbari, Seyyed Mohammad Javad Mortazavi, Hassan Azari
Author Information
  1. Mahsa Eghlidospour: Neural Stem Cell and Regenerative Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Anatomical Sciences, Shiraz School of Medicine, Shiraz Stem Cell Institute, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
  2. Amir Ghanbari: Department of Anatomical Sciences, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran.
  3. Seyyed Mohammad Javad Mortazavi: Ionizing and Non-ionizing Radiation Protection Research Center (INIRPRC), Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
  4. Hassan Azari: Neural Stem Cell and Regenerative Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Anatomical Sciences, Shiraz School of Medicine, Shiraz Stem Cell Institute, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Abstract

Due to the importance of neural stem cells (NSCs) in plasticity of the nervous system and treating neurodegenerative diseases, the main goal of this study was to evaluate the effects of radiofrequency radiation emitted from a GSM 900-MHz mobile phone with different exposure duration on proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis of adult murine NSCs . We used neurosphere assay to evaluate NSCs proliferation, and immunofluorescence assay of neural cell markers to examine NSCs differentiation. We also employed alamarBlue and caspase 3 apoptosis assays to assess harmful effects of mobile phone on NSCs. Our results showed that the number and size of resulting neurospheres and also the percentage of cells differentiated into neurons decreased significantly with increasing exposure duration to GSM 900-MHz radiofrequency (RF)-electromagnetic field (EMF). In contrast, exposure to GSM 900-MHz RF-EMF at different durations did not influence cell viability and apoptosis of NSCs and also their astrocytic differentiation. It is concluded that accumulating dose of GSM 900-MHz RF-EMF might have devastating effects on NSCs proliferation and neurogenesis requiring more causations in terms of using mobile devices.

Keywords

References

  1. Neurosci Lett. 2012 Aug 30;524(2):84-8 [PMID: 22841697]
  2. J Vis Exp. 2010 Nov 20;(45):null [PMID: 21113123]
  3. Exp Neurol. 2010 Nov;226(1):173-82 [PMID: 20816824]
  4. Brain Res. 2009 Apr 10;1265:178-85 [PMID: 19230827]
  5. Anat Cell Biol. 2015 Jun;48(2):104-13 [PMID: 26140221]
  6. Neurosci Lett. 2006 Nov 27;409(1):24-9 [PMID: 17018248]
  7. Neurobiol Dis. 2004 Dec;17(3):445-54 [PMID: 15571980]
  8. J Biomed Phys Eng. 2015 Sep 01;5(3):105-14 [PMID: 26396966]
  9. Brain Res. 2008 Oct 31;1238:224-9 [PMID: 18761003]
  10. Annu Rev Public Health. 2005;26:165-89 [PMID: 15760285]
  11. Cell Death Differ. 2012 May;19(5):735-42 [PMID: 22421963]
  12. Dose Response. 2012 Jul 02;11(2):281-92 [PMID: 23930107]
  13. FASEB J. 2005 Oct;19(12):1686-8 [PMID: 16116041]
  14. Brain Res. 2010 Oct 14;1356:95-101 [PMID: 20691167]
  15. Mol Cell Biochem. 2011 Aug;354(1-2):161-70 [PMID: 21499890]
  16. Mol Neurobiol. 2014 Jun;49(3):1472-86 [PMID: 24532268]
  17. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2016 Jun 01;8(6): [PMID: 26438595]
  18. Bioelectromagnetics. 2007 Feb;28(2):115-21 [PMID: 17004238]
  19. PLoS One. 2014 May 09;9(5):e97309 [PMID: 24817277]
  20. J Mol Neurosci. 2012 Sep;48(1):144-53 [PMID: 22588976]
  21. J Cell Physiol. 2008 Apr;215(1):129-39 [PMID: 17941084]
  22. Science. 1992 Mar 27;255(5052):1707-10 [PMID: 1553558]
  23. Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Jun;111(7):881-3; discussion A408 [PMID: 12782486]
  24. J Neurosci Res. 2006 Dec;84(8):1682-91 [PMID: 17044035]
  25. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42332 [PMID: 22870319]
  26. Physiol Rev. 2005 Apr;85(2):523-69 [PMID: 15788705]
  27. Sci Rep. 2014 May 29;4:5103 [PMID: 24869783]
  28. Radiat Res. 2009 Jul;172(1):66-73 [PMID: 19580508]
  29. Radiat Res. 1999 May;151(5):513-31 [PMID: 10319725]
  30. Mol Neurobiol. 2014 Jun;49(3):1364-72 [PMID: 24390568]
  31. Toxicol Ind Health. 2009 Jul;25(6):377-84 [PMID: 19671630]
  32. Neuron. 2015 Feb 18;85(4):710-7 [PMID: 25661179]
  33. J Nat Med. 2015 Jul;69(3):387-96 [PMID: 25860174]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0NSCsGSMproliferationdifferentiationcells900-MHzmobileexposureapoptosisneuralstemeffectsradiofrequencyphonealsoCellevaluateemitteddifferentdurationassaycellRF-EMFDueimportanceplasticitynervoussystemtreatingneurodegenerativediseasesmaingoalstudyradiationadultmurineusedneurosphereimmunofluorescencemarkersexamineemployedalamarBluecaspase3assaysassessharmfulresultsshowednumbersizeresultingneurospherespercentagedifferentiatedneuronsdecreasedsignificantlyincreasingRF-electromagneticfieldEMFcontrastdurationsinfluenceviabilityastrocyticconcludedaccumulatingdosemightdevastatingneurogenesisrequiringcausationstermsusingdevicesEffectsApoptosisphonesElectromagneticfieldsMicrowavesNeuralRadiofrequency

Similar Articles

Cited By (13)