High-Frequency Ultrasound: Description of Sacral Tissue Characteristics in Healthy Adults.

Ruth S Burk, Christine M Schubert, Anathea Pepperl, Mary Jo Grap
Author Information
  1. Ruth S Burk: Ruth S. Burk, PhD, RN, ANP-BC, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond. Christine M. Schubert, PhD, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio. Anathea Pepperl, PhD, School of Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond. Mary Jo Grap, PhD, RN, FAAN, School of Nursing, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to describe selected sacral tissue characteristics in a convenience sample of healthy volunteer subjects.
DESIGN: Descriptive.
SAMPLE AND SETTING: Fifty healthy volunteers in a clinical learning center in a school of nursing.
METHODS: Sacral scans were obtained using a 20-MHz ultrasound scanning system in 3 positions: prone and 60° and 90° side-lying from the back. The images were analyzed by software in the ultrasound program using quantitative parameters of dermal thickness and density (dermal median intensity and derived number of low-echogenic pixels to total pixels [LEP:TP] ratio).
RESULTS: In general, average values were as follows: dermal thickness between 2.32 and 2.65 mm; median pixel intensity between 102 and 112; and the LEP:TP ratio between 0.39 and 0.56. There were significant differences in sacral tissue characteristics between measures of thickness and dermal density (median intensity and LEP:TP ratio) by subject side-lying position (60° and 90°) versus prone position, with all P values less than .0001.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the ranges were consistent across measures of thickness and dermal density except for systematic differences between side-lying and prone positions. When comparing thickness, median intensity, or LEP:TP ratio, it is important to report subject position. To best recognize tissue inflammation indicative of pressure injuries before surface changes are seen, it is useful to understand healthy high-frequency ultrasound sacral tissue characteristics. It is anticipated that quantitative assessment of dermal thickness, density, and LEP:TP ratio could help identify individuals with incipient pressure injury.

References

  1. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(2):99-108 [PMID: 20593323]
  2. PLoS One. 2014 Jan 21;9(1):e86637 [PMID: 24466182]
  3. Int Wound J. 2013 Aug;10 (4):383-8 [PMID: 22672782]
  4. Skin Res Technol. 2014 Aug;20(3):257-64 [PMID: 24010847]
  5. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998 Dec;39(6):966-70 [PMID: 9843010]
  6. Comput Biol Med. 2011 Jul;41(7):427-34 [PMID: 21600572]
  7. Skin Res Technol. 2016 Aug;22(3):263-75 [PMID: 26333046]
  8. Br J Dermatol. 1998 Nov;139(5):815-21 [PMID: 9892947]
  9. Vaccine. 2007 Aug 21;25(34):6423-30 [PMID: 17640778]
  10. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996 Jul;35(1):37-41 [PMID: 8682961]
  11. Br J Dermatol. 1996 Aug;135(2):218-24 [PMID: 8881663]
  12. Diabetes Care. 2001 Jul;24(7):1270-4 [PMID: 11423514]
  13. J Tissue Viability. 2001 Jul;11(3):97-101 [PMID: 11949615]
  14. Med Eng Phys. 2008 Jul;30(6):804-7 [PMID: 18061508]
  15. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2015 Jun;31(3):141-7 [PMID: 25439140]
  16. Skin Res Technol. 1995 May;1(2):74-80 [PMID: 27328386]
  17. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2015 Jun;31(3):148-54 [PMID: 25636253]
  18. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2012 Sep-Oct;39(5):500-8 [PMID: 22864192]
  19. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2006 Nov-Dec;19(9):498-505 [PMID: 17132955]
  20. Skin Res Technol. 2008 Aug;14(3):270-6 [PMID: 19159371]
  21. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2001 Jul-Aug;14(4):208-15 [PMID: 11902346]
  22. Skin Res Technol. 2013 May;19(2):169-75 [PMID: 23297834]
  23. Fed Regist. 2009 Aug 27;74(165):43753-4236 [PMID: 19827228]
  24. J Spinal Cord Med. 2013 May;36(3):225-30 [PMID: 23809593]
  25. Wound Repair Regen. 2001 Mar-Apr;9(2):123-32 [PMID: 11350650]

Grants

  1. R01 NR010381/NINR NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Posture
Prone Position
Radio Waves
Sacrococcygeal Region
Ultrasonography

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0dermalthicknessratiotissuedensitymedianintensityLEP:TPsacralcharacteristicshealthyultrasoundproneside-lyingpositionSacralusing60°90°quantitativepixelsvalues20differencesmeasuressubjectpressureOBJECTIVES:purposestudydescribeselectedconveniencesamplevolunteersubjectsDESIGN:DescriptiveSAMPLEANDSETTING:FiftyvolunteersclinicallearningcenterschoolnursingMETHODS:scansobtained20-MHzscanningsystem3positions:backimagesanalyzedsoftwareprogramparametersderivednumberlow-echogenictotal[LEP:TP]RESULTS:generalaveragefollows:3265mmpixel1021123956significantversusPless0001CONCLUSIONS:Overallrangesconsistentacrossexceptsystematicpositionscomparingimportantreportbestrecognizeinflammationindicativeinjuriessurfacechangesseenusefulunderstandhigh-frequencyanticipatedassessmenthelpidentifyindividualsincipientinjuryHigh-FrequencyUltrasound:DescriptionTissueCharacteristicsHealthyAdults

Similar Articles

Cited By