Supportive and non-supportive interactions in families with a type 2 diabetes patient: an integrative review.

Birgitte B Bennich, Michael E Røder, Dorthe Overgaard, Ingrid Egerod, Lene Munch, Filip K Knop, Tina Vilsbøll, Hanne Konradsen
Author Information
  1. Birgitte B Bennich: Center for Diabetes Research, Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark.
  2. Michael E Røder: Center for Diabetes Research, Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark.
  3. Dorthe Overgaard: Institute of Nursing, Metropolitan University College, Copenhagen N, Denmark.
  4. Ingrid Egerod: Intensive Care Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  5. Lene Munch: Center for Diabetes Research, Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark.
  6. Filip K Knop: Center for Diabetes Research, Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark.
  7. Tina Vilsbøll: Center for Diabetes Research, Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark.
  8. Hanne Konradsen: Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, NVS, Karolinska Instituttet, Alfred Nobels Allé 23, 141 52 Hundinge, Sweden. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: type 2 diabetes and its management affect the patient and the close family potentially causing either psychological distress or increased sense of responsibility and collaboration in these families. Interactions between patient and family play an important role in maintaining lifestyle changes and diabetes self-management. The purpose of this integrative review was to summarise and assess published studies on the intra-family perspective of supportive and non-supportive interactions in families with a type 2 diabetes patient.
METHODS: Included in the review were published qualitative and quantitative studies that examined the intra-family perspective on supportive and non-supportive interactions. We searched the literature from 2000 to 2016 and the search strategy comprised the following databases: Cochrane, PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycINFO and Psyc-ARTICLES as well as hand searching of reference lists. Quality assessment, data extraction and analysis were undertaken on all included studies.
RESULTS: We identified five eligible research papers. Employing content analysis three categories describing interactions were refined: Impact of practical action, impact of emotional involvement, and impact of communication content. Supportive interactions included encouraging communication and family collaboration in managing diet, medications, and blood glucose checking. Non-supportive interactions were visible irritation, nagging behaviour and refusing to share the burden of living with diabetes.
CONCLUSION: The findings stress the importance of including both patient and family in clinical practice to target diabetes self-management adherence and well-being of the whole family. The majority of self-management occurs within the family environment. Therefore, the intra-family perspective of supportive and non-supportive interactions should be understood and addressed as the family members are interdependent and affected by each other. Future research assessing the impact of professional support and the family function will have the potential to improve the daily life and well-being of patients with type 2 diabetes as well as the whole family.

Keywords

References

  1. Palliat Support Care. 2009 Sep;7(3):365-77 [PMID: 19788779]
  2. J Sch Nurs. 2012 Oct;28(5):326-7 [PMID: 23012244]
  3. Chronic Illn. 2016 Jun;12 (2):116-44 [PMID: 26304692]
  4. Transl Behav Med. 2014 Mar;4(1):26-33 [PMID: 24653774]
  5. J Marital Fam Ther. 2014 Jan;40(1):92-105 [PMID: 25059414]
  6. Diabet Med. 2013 Jul;30(7):767-77 [PMID: 23711019]
  7. Int J Clin Pract. 2008 Jan;62(1):76-87 [PMID: 17983433]
  8. Am J Med. 2005 May;118 Suppl 5A:27S-34S [PMID: 15850551]
  9. Fam Syst Health. 2011 Sep;29(3):253-61 [PMID: 21744962]
  10. Int J Behav Med. 2014 Apr;21(2):230-9 [PMID: 23436184]
  11. Diabet Med. 2005 Oct;22(10):1379-85 [PMID: 16176200]
  12. J Adv Nurs. 2005 Dec;52(5):546-53 [PMID: 16268861]
  13. JAMA. 2015 Sep 8;314(10):1021-9 [PMID: 26348752]
  14. J Behav Med. 2015 Apr;38(2):363-71 [PMID: 25420694]
  15. Health Psychol. 2009 Jan;28(1):48-55 [PMID: 19210017]
  16. Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Dec;97(3):418-25 [PMID: 25282327]
  17. Diabetes Educ. 2011 Jul-Aug;37(4):528-35 [PMID: 21690434]
  18. Soc Sci Med. 2010 Nov;71(10):1831-8 [PMID: 20889249]
  19. Diabetes Care. 2010 Apr;33(4):751-3 [PMID: 20150299]
  20. Fam Process. 2007 Mar;46(1):35-52 [PMID: 17375727]
  21. Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88 [PMID: 16204405]
  22. BMC Med. 2014 Jan 24;12:12 [PMID: 24460622]
  23. J Fam Psychol. 2006 Jun;20(2):311-8 [PMID: 16756407]
  24. J Fam Nurs. 2014 Jul 15;20(3):259-286 [PMID: 25026964]
  25. Invest Educ Enferm. 2014;32(2):260-9 [PMID: 25230037]
  26. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2013 Nov 06;6:421-6 [PMID: 24232691]
  27. Qual Health Res. 2005 Jul;15(6):750-65 [PMID: 15961873]
  28. Diabet Med. 2013 Jul;30(7):778-88 [PMID: 23701236]
  29. Health Psychol. 2013 Oct;32(10):1029-37 [PMID: 23025302]
  30. Int J Clin Pract. 2011 Mar;65(3):314-22 [PMID: 21314869]
  31. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Dec;23(12):1992-9 [PMID: 18855075]
  32. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011 Jul;93(1):1-9 [PMID: 21382643]
  33. Ann Behav Med. 2010 Dec;40(3):325-42 [PMID: 20697859]
  34. Diabet Med. 2014 Jan;31(1):15-23 [PMID: 23870045]
  35. Eur J Gen Pract. 2015 Jun;21(2):103-10 [PMID: 25698085]
  36. J Fam Psychol. 2013 Oct;27(5):712-21 [PMID: 24040902]
  37. Nurse Educ Today. 2004 Feb;24(2):105-12 [PMID: 14769454]
  38. Diabetes Care. 1988 May;11(5):377-86 [PMID: 3391088]
  39. Psychother Psychosom. 2010;79(3):136-48 [PMID: 20185970]
  40. J Adv Nurs. 2012 Feb;68(2):391-401 [PMID: 21707728]
  41. Health Soc Care Community. 2012 Nov;20(6):591-8 [PMID: 22758654]
  42. Chronic Illn. 2010 Mar;6(1):22-33 [PMID: 20308348]
  43. Arch Med Res. 2005 May-Jun;36(3):300-6 [PMID: 15925020]
  44. J Adv Nurs. 2004 Jul;47(2):174-82 [PMID: 15196191]
  45. J Fam Nurs. 2010 Nov;16(4):355-77 [PMID: 21051754]
  46. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015 Sep;1353:89-112 [PMID: 26250784]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0familydiabetesinteractions2patientreviewnon-supportivefamiliesself-managementstudiesintra-familyperspectivesupportivetypeimpactTypecollaborationintegrativepublishedwellanalysisincludedresearchcontentcommunicationSupportivewell-beingwholeBACKGROUND:managementaffectclosepotentiallycausingeitherpsychologicaldistressincreasedsenseresponsibilityInteractionsplayimportantrolemaintaininglifestylechangespurposesummariseassessMETHODS:Includedqualitativequantitativeexaminedsearchedliterature20002016searchstrategycomprisedfollowingdatabases:CochranePubMedCINAHLWebSciencePsycINFOPsyc-ARTICLEShandsearchingreferencelistsQualityassessmentdataextractionundertakenRESULTS:identifiedfiveeligiblepapersEmployingthreecategoriesdescribingrefined:ImpactpracticalactionemotionalinvolvementencouragingmanagingdietmedicationsbloodglucosecheckingNon-supportivevisibleirritationnaggingbehaviourrefusingshareburdenlivingCONCLUSION:findingsstressimportanceincludingclinicalpracticetargetadherencemajorityoccurswithinenvironmentThereforeunderstoodaddressedmembersinterdependentaffectedFutureassessingprofessionalsupportfunctionwillpotentialimprovedailylifepatientspatient:FamilyInteractionInvolvementLiteratureSupport

Similar Articles

Cited By