Appraisal of unimodal cues during agonistic interactions in .

Laura Chabrolles, Imen Ben Ammar, Marie S A Fernandez, Nicolas Boyer, Joël Attia, Paulo J Fonseca, M Clara P Amorim, Marilyn Beauchaud
Author Information
  1. Laura Chabrolles: Equipe Neuro-Ethologie Sensorielle, ENES/Neuro-PSI CNRS UMR 9197, Université de Lyon/Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.
  2. Imen Ben Ammar: Equipe Neuro-Ethologie Sensorielle, ENES/Neuro-PSI CNRS UMR 9197, Université de Lyon/Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.
  3. Marie S A Fernandez: Equipe Neuro-Ethologie Sensorielle, ENES/Neuro-PSI CNRS UMR 9197, Université de Lyon/Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.
  4. Nicolas Boyer: Equipe Neuro-Ethologie Sensorielle, ENES/Neuro-PSI CNRS UMR 9197, Université de Lyon/Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.
  5. Joël Attia: Equipe Neuro-Ethologie Sensorielle, ENES/Neuro-PSI CNRS UMR 9197, Université de Lyon/Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.
  6. Paulo J Fonseca: Departamento de Biologia Animal and cE3c-Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
  7. M Clara P Amorim: MARE-Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, ISPA, Instituto Universitário, Lisbon, Portugal.
  8. Marilyn Beauchaud: Equipe Neuro-Ethologie Sensorielle, ENES/Neuro-PSI CNRS UMR 9197, Université de Lyon/Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.

Abstract

Communication is essential during social interactions including animal conflicts and it is often a complex process involving multiple sensory channels or modalities. To better understand how different modalities interact during communication, it is fundamental to study the behavioural responses to both the composite multimodal signal and each unimodal component with adequate experimental protocols. Here we test how an African cichlid, which communicates with multiple senses, responds to different sensory stimuli in a social relevant scenario. We tested males with isolated chemical (urine or holding water coming both from dominant males), visual (real opponent or video playback) and acoustic (agonistic sounds) cues during agonistic interactions. We showed that (1) these fish relied mostly on the visual modality, showing increased aggressiveness in response to the sight of a real contestant but no responses to urine or agonistic sounds presented separately, (2) video playback in our study did not appear appropriate to test the visual modality and needs more technical prospecting, (3) holding water provoked territorial behaviours and seems to be promising for the investigation into the role of the chemical channel in this species. Our findings suggest that unimodal signals are non-redundant but how different sensory modalities interplay during communication remains largely unknown in fish.

Keywords

References

  1. Curr Zool. 2017 Feb;63(1):45-54 [PMID: 29491962]
  2. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2003 Nov;78(4):575-95 [PMID: 14700392]
  3. J Exp Biol. 2012 Jan 1;215(Pt 1):68-74 [PMID: 22162854]
  4. Am Nat. 2005 Aug;166(2):231-45 [PMID: 16032576]
  5. Experientia. 1974 Dec 15;30(12):1394-5 [PMID: 4442523]
  6. Anim Cogn. 2016 May;19(3):523-31 [PMID: 26801496]
  7. Anim Cogn. 2009 Sep;12(5):717-24 [PMID: 19462188]
  8. J Exp Biol. 2015 Oct;218(Pt 20):3284-94 [PMID: 26491195]
  9. Aquaculture. 2009 Dec 1;297(1-4):157-162 [PMID: 25587201]
  10. Evolution. 2010 Oct;64(10):2797-807 [PMID: 20500213]
  11. PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e20313 [PMID: 21633515]
  12. J Exp Biol. 2013 Nov 1;216(Pt 21):3996-4004 [PMID: 23948469]
  13. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e46579 [PMID: 23144784]
  14. J Biosci. 2000 Sep;25(3):285-90 [PMID: 11022231]
  15. Adv Genet. 2011;75:23-49 [PMID: 22078476]
  16. Biol Lett. 2005 Dec 22;1(4):411-4 [PMID: 17148220]
  17. PLoS One. 2013 Apr 19;8(4):e61467 [PMID: 23620756]
  18. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Feb 15;102(7):2425-9 [PMID: 15677318]
  19. J Fish Biol. 2012 Apr;80(4):752-66 [PMID: 22471797]
  20. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2015 Sep 15;221:64-74 [PMID: 25622908]
  21. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2015 Dec 1;6:115-124 [PMID: 26693169]
  22. Rev Sci Instrum. 2012 May;83(5):055007 [PMID: 22667648]
  23. J Chem Ecol. 2016 Feb;42(2):173-82 [PMID: 26846373]
  24. BMC Biol. 2007 Dec 12;5:54 [PMID: 18076759]
  25. Science. 1999 Feb 26;283(5406):1272-3 [PMID: 10084931]
  26. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Aug;124(2):1332-8 [PMID: 18681618]
  27. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37612 [PMID: 22624055]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0interactionsagonisticsensorymodalitiesdifferentunimodalvisualsocialmultiplecommunicationstudyresponsestestmaleschemicalurineholdingwaterrealvideoplaybacksoundscuesfishmodalitysignalsCommunicationessentialincludinganimalconflictsoftencomplexprocessinvolvingchannelsbetterunderstandinteractfundamentalbehaviouralcompositemultimodalsignalcomponentadequateexperimentalprotocolsAfricancichlidcommunicatessensesrespondsstimulirelevantscenariotestedisolatedcomingdominantopponentacousticshowed1reliedmostlyshowingincreasedaggressivenessresponsesightcontestantpresentedseparately2appearappropriateneedstechnicalprospecting3provokedterritorialbehavioursseemspromisinginvestigationrolechannelspeciesfindingssuggestnon-redundantinterplayremainslargelyunknownAppraisalAcousticAgonisticOlfactionPlaybackexperimentsUnimodalVisual

Similar Articles

Cited By (5)