Estimating of hepatic fat amount using MRI proton density fat fraction in a real practice setting.

Hyeyoung Lee, Dae Won Jun, Bo-Kyeong Kang, Eunwoo Nam, Misoo Chang, Mimi Kim, Soonyoung Song, Byung Chul Yoon, Hang Lak Lee, Oh Young Lee, Ho Soon Choi, Kang Nyeong Lee
Author Information
  1. Hyeyoung Lee: Department of Internal Medicine Department of Radiology Department of Biostatistical Consulting and Research Lab, School of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Abstract

The recently developed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) proton density fat fraction (PDFF) allows measurement of the fat in all segments of hepatic tissue. However, it is time consuming and inconvenient to measure each segment repeatedly. Moreover, volume of each segment also should be adjusted with arithmetic mean of the selected segments when total amount of liver fat is estimated. Therefore, we try to develop a clinically-relevant and applicable method of estimating hepatic fat in PDFF image.A total of 164 adults were enrolled. We addressed the measurement frequency and segment selection to determine the optimal method of measuring intrahepatic fat. Total hepatic fat was estimated by the weighted mean of each segment reflecting their respective segmental volumes. We designed 2 models. In Model 1, we determined the segment order by which the mean was closest to the whole weighted mean. In Model 2, we determined the segment order by which the arithmetic mean of the selected segments was closest to the whole weighted mean.Fat fraction (FF) was most important risk factor of hepatic heterogeneity in multivariable analysis (β = 0.534, P < .001). In severe fatty liver (FF > 22.1%), intrahepatic fat variability was 2.47% (1.16-6.26%). The arithmetic mean total intrahepatic FF was 12.66%. But the weighted mean that applied to each segmental volume was 12.90%. In Model 1, arithmetic mean of segments 4 and 5 was closest to the total estimated hepatic fat amount. However, when we added segment 8, the mean of segments 4, 5, and 8 was significantly different from the estimated total hepatic fat amount (P = .0021). In Model 2, arithmetic mean of segments 4 and 5 was closest to the total estimated hepatic fat amount. There was a significant reduction in variability between segment 4 and segments 4 and 5 (P < .0001).Averaging the mean hepatic FF of segments 4 and 5 was the most reasonable method for estimating total intrahepatic fat in practice.

References

  1. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Jan;43(1):83-95 [PMID: 26369383]
  2. BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 20;6(9):e010507 [PMID: 27650757]
  3. Radiology. 2015 Feb;274(2):416-25 [PMID: 25247408]
  4. Hepatology. 2013 Dec;58(6):1930-40 [PMID: 23696515]
  5. Abdom Imaging. 2015 Oct;40(8):3070-7 [PMID: 26350282]
  6. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2016 Sep;9(5):692-701 [PMID: 27582882]
  7. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Jul;36(1):22-9 [PMID: 22554256]
  8. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2015 Jul;89(1):37-42 [PMID: 26131443]
  9. Biol Res Nurs. 2004 Oct;6(2):151-7 [PMID: 15388912]
  10. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Feb;43(2):398-406 [PMID: 26201284]
  11. Gastroenterology. 2016 Jun;150(8):1811-1822.e4 [PMID: 27003601]
  12. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Jun;39(6):1525-32 [PMID: 24987758]
  13. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jun;107(6):811-26 [PMID: 22641309]
  14. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017 Mar;42(3):833-841 [PMID: 27688063]
  15. World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Oct 21;22(39):8812-8819 [PMID: 27818597]
  16. HPB (Oxford). 2014 May;16(5):439-47 [PMID: 24033584]
  17. Radiology. 2013 May;267(2):422-31 [PMID: 23382291]
  18. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Nov;42(5):1281-90 [PMID: 25920074]

MeSH Term

Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Alcohol Drinking
Body Mass Index
Cross-Sectional Studies
Fatty Liver
Female
Humans
Lipids
Liver
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Obesity
Young Adult

Chemicals

Lipids

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0fatmeanhepaticsegmentssegmenttotal4arithmeticamountestimated5intrahepaticweighted2Modelclosestfractionmethod1FFMRIprotondensityPDFFmeasurementHowevervolumeselectedliverestimatingsegmentaldeterminedorderwholeP <variability128practicerecentlydevelopedmagneticresonanceimagingallowstissuetimeconsuminginconvenientmeasurerepeatedlyMoreoveralsoadjustedThereforetrydevelopclinically-relevantapplicableimageA164adultsenrolledaddressedfrequencyselectiondetermineoptimalmeasuringTotalreflectingrespectivevolumesdesignedmodelsFatimportantriskfactorheterogeneitymultivariableanalysisβ = 0534001severefattyFF > 221%47%16-626%66%applied90%addedsignificantlydifferentP = 0021significantreduction0001AveragingreasonableEstimatingusingrealsetting

Similar Articles

Cited By