A systematic review of sub-national food insecurity research in South Africa: Missed opportunities for policy insights.

Alison Misselhorn, Sheryl L Hendriks
Author Information
  1. Alison Misselhorn: Institute for Food, Nutrition and Well-being, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa.
  2. Sheryl L Hendriks: Institute for Food, Nutrition and Well-being and the Department of Agricultural Economics, Extension and Rural Development, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa. ORCID

Abstract

Food insecurity is an intractable problem in South Africa. The country has a tradition of evidence-based decision making, grounded in the findings of national surveys. However, the rich insights from sub-national surveys remain a largely untapped resource for understandings of the contextual experience of food insecurity. A web-based search identified 169 sub-national food insecurity studies conducted in the post-apartheid period between 1994 and 2014. The systematic review found that the studies used 27 different measures of food insecurity, confounding the comparative analysis of food insecurity at this level. While social grants have brought a measure of poverty relief at household level, unaffordable diets were the root cause of food insecurity. The increasing consumption of cheaper, more available and preferred 'globalised' foods with high energy content and low nutritional value lead to overweight and obesity alongside child stunting. Unless a comparable set of indicators is used in such surveys, they are not able to provide comparable information on the scope and scale of the problem. Policy makers should be engaging with researchers to learn from these studies, while researchers need to share this wealth of sub-national study findings with government to strengthen food security planning, monitoring, and evaluation at all levels.

References

  1. J Chiropr Med. 2006 Autumn;5(3):101-17 [PMID: 19674681]
  2. Ecol Food Nutr. 2015;54(2):118-37 [PMID: 25551521]
  3. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117 [PMID: 24047204]
  4. Public Health Nutr. 2014 Jun;17(6):1363-74 [PMID: 23680029]
  5. Public Health Nutr. 2006 Oct;9(7):830-6 [PMID: 17010247]
  6. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2011 Feb;62(1):1-16 [PMID: 20701549]
  7. J Adv Nurs. 2004 Nov;48(3):271-8 [PMID: 15488041]
  8. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):43-9 [PMID: 17161753]
  9. J Prim Prev. 2014 Aug;35(4):255-65 [PMID: 24806889]
  10. Public Health Nutr. 2005 Aug;8(5):501-8 [PMID: 16153331]
  11. Public Health Nutr. 2011 Oct;14(10):1752-8 [PMID: 21729474]
  12. Soc Sci Med. 2011 Sep;73(5):685-92 [PMID: 21824702]
  13. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2014 Oct;27(5):443-9 [PMID: 24118323]
  14. Ecol Food Nutr. 2016;55(2):141-62 [PMID: 26789552]
  15. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Mar 13;13:37 [PMID: 23497061]
  16. Bull World Health Organ. 2011 Dec 1;89(12):891-9 [PMID: 22271946]
  17. J Affect Disord. 2013 Sep 5;150(2):460-5 [PMID: 23707034]
  18. Health Policy. 2011 Mar;99(3):267-76 [PMID: 20884072]
  19. Public Health Nutr. 2005 Aug;8(5):480-90 [PMID: 16153329]
  20. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2013 Nov 25;9(1):78 [PMID: 24274394]
  21. Qual Health Res. 1998 May;8(3):341-51 [PMID: 10558335]
  22. AIDS Behav. 2011 Oct;15(7):1490-502 [PMID: 21822628]
  23. PLoS One. 2013 Jun 25;8(6):e67184 [PMID: 23825639]
  24. Arch Iran Med. 2014 Aug;17(8):574-84 [PMID: 25065282]
  25. Health Place. 2007 Jun;13(2):341-55 [PMID: 16621665]
  26. Epidemiol Health. 2014 Sep 11;36:e2014018 [PMID: 25223334]
  27. Public Health Nutr. 2007 Apr;10(4):379-89 [PMID: 17362534]
  28. Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2007 Aug;69:96-106 [PMID: 17676510]
  29. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005 Jul;10 Suppl 1:21-34 [PMID: 16053581]
  30. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2013 Apr 16;9:27 [PMID: 23590903]
  31. Nurse Res. 2011;18(2):52-62 [PMID: 21319484]
  32. Rev Saude Publica. 2013 Dec;47(6):1159-71 [PMID: 24626554]
  33. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Sep;58(9):794-800 [PMID: 15310807]
  34. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011 Jan;65(1):14-9 [PMID: 19710043]
  35. Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2007 Aug;69:165-74 [PMID: 17676519]
  36. BMC Med. 2011 Apr 14;9:39 [PMID: 21492447]
  37. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2008 Feb;59(1):46-60 [PMID: 18097843]
  38. Cien Saude Colet. 2014 May;19(5):1475-88 [PMID: 24897212]
  39. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 1997 Mar;48(2):95-101 [PMID: 9135771]
  40. J Environ Manage. 2007 Jul;84(2):146-56 [PMID: 17045732]
  41. Eval Program Plann. 2009 Feb;32(1):31-42 [PMID: 19004496]
  42. PLoS Med. 2012;9(6):e1001223 [PMID: 22745604]
  43. Public Health Nutr. 2015 Apr;18(5):877-92 [PMID: 24963759]
  44. Public Health Nutr. 2014 Jan;17(1):94-112 [PMID: 23561752]
  45. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Mar 16;11:29 [PMID: 21410933]
  46. PLoS One. 2013 Oct 14;8(10):e76939 [PMID: 24155911]
  47. J Adv Nurs. 2005 Apr;50(2):204-11 [PMID: 15788085]
  48. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005 Sep;59(9):1030-42 [PMID: 16015273]

MeSH Term

Food Supply
Health Policy
South Africa

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0insecurityfoodsub-nationalsurveysstudiesproblemSouthfindingsinsightssystematicreviewusedlevelcomparableresearchersFoodintractableAfricacountrytraditionevidence-baseddecisionmakinggroundednationalHoweverrichremainlargelyuntappedresourceunderstandingscontextualexperienceweb-basedsearchidentified169conductedpost-apartheidperiod19942014found27differentmeasuresconfoundingcomparativeanalysissocialgrantsbroughtmeasurepovertyreliefhouseholdunaffordabledietsrootcauseincreasingconsumptioncheaperavailablepreferred'globalised'foodshighenergycontentlownutritionalvalueleadoverweightobesityalongsidechildstuntingUnlesssetindicatorsableprovideinformationscopescalePolicymakersengaginglearnneedsharewealthstudygovernmentstrengthensecurityplanningmonitoringevaluationlevelsresearchAfrica:Missedopportunitiespolicy

Similar Articles

Cited By