Patient-Reported Outcomes Are Better after Oncoplastic Breast Conservation than after Mastectomy and Autologous Reconstruction.

Natalie D Chand, Victoria Browne, Nirmala Paramanathan, Lashan J Peiris, Siobhan A Laws, Richard M Rainsbury
Author Information
  1. Natalie D Chand: Breast Surgery Unit, Division of Family and Clinical Support Services, Florence Portal House, Royal Hampshire County Hospital, Winchester, Hampshire, United Kingdom.
  2. Victoria Browne: Breast Surgery Unit, Division of Family and Clinical Support Services, Florence Portal House, Royal Hampshire County Hospital, Winchester, Hampshire, United Kingdom.
  3. Nirmala Paramanathan: Breast Surgery Unit, Division of Family and Clinical Support Services, Florence Portal House, Royal Hampshire County Hospital, Winchester, Hampshire, United Kingdom.
  4. Lashan J Peiris: Breast Surgery Unit, Division of Family and Clinical Support Services, Florence Portal House, Royal Hampshire County Hospital, Winchester, Hampshire, United Kingdom.
  5. Siobhan A Laws: Breast Surgery Unit, Division of Family and Clinical Support Services, Florence Portal House, Royal Hampshire County Hospital, Winchester, Hampshire, United Kingdom.
  6. Richard M Rainsbury: Breast Surgery Unit, Division of Family and Clinical Support Services, Florence Portal House, Royal Hampshire County Hospital, Winchester, Hampshire, United Kingdom.

Abstract

Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OBCS) avoids mastectomy for larger tumors, but patient-reported outcomes are unknown.
METHODS: The BREAST-Q questionnaire was distributed to 333 women following therapeutic mammaplasty or latissimus dorsi (LD) miniflap since 1991 [tumor diameter, 32.5 (5-100) mm). QScore software generated scores/100 for breast appearance, physical, emotional, and sexual wellbeing. Outcomes following therapeutic mammaplasty and LD miniflap were compared and qualitative data analyzed to identify common themes relating to satisfaction.
RESULTS: One hundred fifty (45%) women responded [mammaplasty versus LD miniflap, 52% versus 42%; age, 52 (30-83) years; follow-up, 84 (4-281) months). Eighty-nine percent rated OBCS better than mastectomy, > 80% recommending it to others. Mean outcome scores for breast appearance, physical, and emotional wellbeing were high and persisted beyond 15 years. Therapeutic mammaplasty patients were significantly more satisfied than those undergoing LD miniflap with the shape ( < 0.05), the size ( < 0.005), and the natural feel of the treated breast ( = 0.01). They demonstrated similar scores for physical and emotional wellbeing and a lower score for sexual wellbeing than LD miniflap patients. More LD miniflap patients reported back/shoulder symptoms and were more likely to report upper back pain ( < 0.05), but very few (< 5%) were concerned about donor-site appearance. Overall satisfaction with surgical outcomes was high in both OBCS groups (82% "excellent/very good") but greatest after therapeutic mammaplasty ( < 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients report long-lasting satisfaction after OBCS and outcomes that compare very favorably with those reported following mastectomy and immediate autologous reconstruction.

References

  1. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Aug;22(8):2500-8 [PMID: 25519931]
  2. N Engl J Med. 1995 Apr 6;332(14):907-11 [PMID: 7877647]
  3. Breast J. 2005 Nov-Dec;11(6):425-32 [PMID: 16297087]
  4. Breast J. 2015 Jan-Feb;21(1):52-9 [PMID: 25583035]
  5. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jul 10;26(20):3331-7 [PMID: 18612149]
  6. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Feb;125(2):454-62 [PMID: 20124831]
  7. Br J Surg. 2003 Dec;90(12):1505-9 [PMID: 14648728]
  8. J Med Pract Manage. 2007 Mar-Apr;22(5):255-61 [PMID: 17494478]
  9. J Surg Oncol. 2015 Mar 15;111(4):377-81 [PMID: 25492532]
  10. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Jul 19;92(14):1143-50 [PMID: 10904087]
  11. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1999 Dec;33(4):419-22 [PMID: 10614751]
  12. Am J Surg. 2008 Oct;196(4):512-8 [PMID: 18809053]
  13. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016 Sep;69(9):1184-91 [PMID: 27406255]
  14. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Aug;124(2):345-53 [PMID: 19644246]
  15. Breast. 2007 Aug;16(4):387-95 [PMID: 17376687]
  16. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016 Feb;69(2):149-62 [PMID: 26740288]
  17. Milbank Q. 1988;66(1):172-89 [PMID: 3173261]
  18. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000 Oct;106(5):991-7 [PMID: 11039369]
  19. N Engl J Med. 2002 Oct 17;347(16):1233-41 [PMID: 12393820]
  20. Ann Surg. 2003 Jan;237(1):26-34 [PMID: 12496527]
  21. ANZ J Surg. 2005 Nov;75(11):940-7 [PMID: 16336382]
  22. Surg Oncol. 2010 Dec;19(4):e95-e102 [PMID: 19716288]
  23. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005 Aug;92(3):217-22 [PMID: 16155792]
  24. Breast J. 2008 Mar-Apr;14(2):176-81 [PMID: 18248559]
  25. ISRN Oncol. 2013 Sep 12;2013:742462 [PMID: 24167743]
  26. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Mar;125(3):811-7 [PMID: 20195109]
  27. Ann Plast Surg. 2014 Feb;72(2):145-9 [PMID: 23503430]
  28. N Engl J Med. 2002 Oct 17;347(16):1227-32 [PMID: 12393819]
  29. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Jul;124(1):9-17 [PMID: 19568039]
  30. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Mar;111(3):1102-9 [PMID: 12621180]
  31. Radiother Oncol. 1994 Nov;33(2):106-12 [PMID: 7708953]
  32. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Sep;124(3):722-36 [PMID: 19730292]
  33. Br J Surg. 1997 Jan;84(1):101-5 [PMID: 9043470]
  34. Br J Surg. 2003 Apr;90(4):433-9 [PMID: 12673744]
  35. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jan;42(1):71-7 [PMID: 26382101]
  36. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 Aug;167(2):385-9 [PMID: 8686611]
  37. Aesthet Surg J. 2008 Jul-Aug;28(4):417-20 [PMID: 19083555]
  38. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Jun;127(6):2167-75 [PMID: 21617450]
  39. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 1996 Aug;41(4):346-53 [PMID: 9183883]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0LDminiflap<0OBCSmammaplastywellbeingmastectomyoutcomesfollowingtherapeuticbreastappearancephysicalemotionalsatisfactionpatientsOncoplasticwomensexualOutcomesversusyearsscoreshigh05005reportedreportbreast-conservingsurgeryavoidslargertumorspatient-reportedunknownMETHODS:BREAST-Qquestionnairedistributed333latissimusdorsisince1991[tumordiameter3255-100mmQScoresoftwaregeneratedscores/100comparedqualitativedataanalyzedidentifycommonthemesrelatingRESULTS:Onehundredfifty45%responded[mammaplasty52%42%age5230-83follow-up844-281monthsEighty-ninepercentratedbetter>80%recommendingothersMeanoutcomepersistedbeyond15Therapeuticsignificantlysatisfiedundergoingshapesizenaturalfeeltreated=01demonstratedsimilarlowerscoreback/shouldersymptomslikelyupperbackpain5%concerneddonor-siteOverallsurgicalgroups82%"excellent/verygood"greatestCONCLUSIONS:Patientslong-lastingcomparefavorablyimmediateautologousreconstructionPatient-ReportedBetterBreastConservationMastectomyAutologousReconstruction

Similar Articles

Cited By