Mind wandering simultaneously prolongs reactions and promotes creative incubation.

Marcin Leszczynski, Leila Chaieb, Thomas P Reber, Marlene Derner, Nikolai Axmacher, Juergen Fell
Author Information
  1. Marcin Leszczynski: Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA. leszczynski.marcin@gmail.com. ORCID
  2. Leila Chaieb: Department of Epileptology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
  3. Thomas P Reber: Department of Epileptology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany. ORCID
  4. Marlene Derner: Department of Epileptology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
  5. Nikolai Axmacher: Department of Neuropsychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
  6. Juergen Fell: Department of Epileptology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Abstract

Mind wandering (MW) refers to the disengagement of attention from the external environment and the generation of thoughts unrelated to the task at hand. It is a ubiquitous cognitive process resulting in lapses of attention. MW imposes a negative impact on attention-based task performance, but also has been associated with enhanced creativity and future planning. In three experiments we show that MW relates simultaneously to both behavioral costs but also benefits. Behavioral costs were measured by prolonged reaction times (RT) in sustained attention to response tasks (SART), whereas the benefits were observed as improved performance in the creative problem solving and daily routine planning tasks performed after the SART. Additionally, we found an increased dispersion of RTs during MW suggesting that attention during these times underwent dynamical changes compared to states when participants were fully focused on the task. Our results support a model in which MW deteriorates performance in the task at hand and is related to dynamical changes in attention. At the same time it is also able to improve human capacity for complex operations.

References

  1. Conscious Cogn. 2011 Dec;20(4):1604-11 [PMID: 21917482]
  2. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Jul;15(7):319-26 [PMID: 21684189]
  3. Front Psychol. 2013 Dec 23;4:962 [PMID: 24391621]
  4. Brain Cogn. 2002 Aug;49(3):402-19 [PMID: 12139961]
  5. J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Nov;26(11):2596-607 [PMID: 24742189]
  6. BMJ. 2012 Dec 13;345:e8105 [PMID: 23241270]
  7. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 Feb;141(1):2-18 [PMID: 21823805]
  8. Psychol Rev. 1962 May;69:220-32 [PMID: 14472013]
  9. Conscious Cogn. 2004 Dec;13(4):657-90 [PMID: 15522626]
  10. Front Psychol. 2015 Jun 17;6:834 [PMID: 26136715]
  11. Exp Brain Res. 2016 Jul 21;:null [PMID: 27443852]
  12. Neuroimage. 2017 Feb 15;147:272-281 [PMID: 27989779]
  13. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2016 Nov;17 (11):718-731 [PMID: 27654862]
  14. Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 Jan 3;66:487-518 [PMID: 25293689]
  15. Front Psychol. 2013 Aug 16;4:441 [PMID: 23966961]
  16. Can J Exp Psychol. 2013 Mar;67(1):11-8 [PMID: 23458547]
  17. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 Mar 21;:null [PMID: 28402561]
  18. JAMA. 2008 Sep 17;300(11):1350-2 [PMID: 18799450]
  19. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jul 29;7:409 [PMID: 23908620]
  20. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Mar;136(3):370-81 [PMID: 21349473]
  21. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 May 26;106(21):8719-24 [PMID: 19433790]
  22. Psychol Sci. 2012 Oct 1;23(10):1117-22 [PMID: 22941876]
  23. Science. 2010 Nov 12;330(6006):932 [PMID: 21071660]
  24. Neuroimage. 2015 May 1;111:611-21 [PMID: 25725466]
  25. Neuropsychologia. 1997 Jun;35(6):747-58 [PMID: 9204482]
  26. Trends Neurosci. 2006 Aug;29(8):474-80 [PMID: 16820224]
  27. Cognition. 2009 Jun;111(3):345-55 [PMID: 19327760]
  28. Psychol Bull. 2013 May;139(3):519-35 [PMID: 23607430]
  29. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Jan;40(1):251-60 [PMID: 23957365]

MeSH Term

Adult
Attention
Creativity
Female
Humans
Male
Models, Theoretical
Problem Solving
Reaction Time
Task Performance and Analysis
Wandering Behavior
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0MWattentiontaskperformancealsoMindwanderinghandplanningsimultaneouslycostsbenefitstimestasksSARTcreativedynamicalchangesrefersdisengagementexternalenvironmentgenerationthoughtsunrelatedubiquitouscognitiveprocessresultinglapsesimposesnegativeimpactattention-basedassociatedenhancedcreativityfuturethreeexperimentsshowrelatesbehavioralBehavioralmeasuredprolongedreactionRTsustainedresponsewhereasobservedimprovedproblemsolvingdailyroutineperformedAdditionallyfoundincreaseddispersionRTssuggestingunderwentcomparedstatesparticipantsfullyfocusedresultssupportmodeldeterioratesrelatedtimeableimprovehumancapacitycomplexoperationsprolongsreactionspromotesincubation

Similar Articles

Cited By