The evolution of mutualism with modifiers.

Christopher G Quickfall, James A R Marshall
Author Information
  1. Christopher G Quickfall: Department of Computer Science University of Sheffield Sheffield UK.
  2. James A R Marshall: Department of Computer Science University of Sheffield Sheffield UK. ORCID

Abstract

Mutualisms are widespread, yet their evolution has received less theoretical attention than within-species social behaviors. Here, we extend previous models of unconditional pairwise interspecies social behavior, to consider selection for donation but also for donation-suppressing modifiers. We present conditions under which modifiers that suppress costly donation receive either positive or negative selection; assortment only at the donation locus always leads to selection for donation suppression, as in within-species greenbeard traits. However, genomewide assortment with modifier loci can lead to intermediate levels of donation, and these can differ in the two species even when payoffs from donation are additive and symmetric. When costly donation between species can evolve without being suppressed, we argue that it is most appropriately explained by indirect fitness benefits within the donating species, using partner species as vectors for altruism. Our work has implications for identifying both the stability and the ultimate beneficiaries of social behavior between species.

Keywords

References

  1. Science. 2003 Jan 3;299(5603):105-6 [PMID: 12511650]
  2. J Theor Biol. 1996 May 7;180(1):27-37 [PMID: 8763356]
  3. Ecol Evol. 2017 Jun 28;7(16):6114-6118 [PMID: 28861217]
  4. J Evol Biol. 2006 Jul;19(4):1283-93 [PMID: 16780529]
  5. J Theor Biol. 1991 Mar 7;149(1):63-74 [PMID: 1881147]
  6. Am J Bot. 2001 Nov;88(11):1960-5 [PMID: 21669629]
  7. Evolution. 2010 Jan;64(1):25-38 [PMID: 19780812]
  8. Trends Ecol Evol. 2011 Jul;26(7):325-32 [PMID: 21620513]
  9. Am Nat. 1997 Jul;150 Suppl 1:S80-99 [PMID: 18811314]
  10. J Evol Biol. 2011 May;24(5):1020-43 [PMID: 21371156]
  11. J Theor Biol. 1964 Jul;7(1):1-16 [PMID: 5875341]
  12. J Theor Biol. 1994 Oct 21;170(4):393-400 [PMID: 7996864]
  13. Evolution. 2011 Oct;65(10):2729-42 [PMID: 21967416]
  14. Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Jan 7;276(1654):13-9 [PMID: 18765343]
  15. Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Feb;14(2):49-53 [PMID: 10234251]
  16. Evolution. 1990 Sep;44(6):1614-1624 [PMID: 28564309]
  17. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jun 28;108 Suppl 2:10792-9 [PMID: 21690389]
  18. J Evol Biol. 2013 Sep;26(9):1854-65 [PMID: 23848844]
  19. Am Nat. 2006 Aug;168(2):252-62 [PMID: 16874634]
  20. Genetics. 1965 Nov;52(5):875-90 [PMID: 17248281]
  21. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2012 Sep;36(5):990-1004 [PMID: 22229800]
  22. Genetics. 2002 Aug;161(4):1727-50 [PMID: 12196414]
  23. Cell. 2008 Nov 14;135(4):726-37 [PMID: 19013280]
  24. Ecol Lett. 2011 Dec;14(12):1300-12 [PMID: 22011186]
  25. J Theor Biol. 1964 Jul;7(1):17-52 [PMID: 5875340]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0donationspeciessocialselectionmodifiersassortmentcanevolutionwithin-speciesbehaviorcostlysuppressiongreenbeardaltruismMutualismswidespreadyetreceivedlesstheoreticalattentionbehaviorsextendpreviousmodelsunconditionalpairwiseinterspeciesconsideralsodonation-suppressingpresentconditionssuppressreceiveeitherpositivenegativelocusalwaysleadstraitsHowevergenomewidemodifierlocileadintermediatelevelsdiffertwoevenpayoffsadditivesymmetricevolvewithoutsuppressedargueappropriatelyexplainedindirectfitnessbenefitswithindonatingusingpartnervectorsworkimplicationsidentifyingstabilityultimatebeneficiariesmutualismfalsebeard

Similar Articles

Cited By