A Systematic Literature Review of Economic Evaluations of Antibiotic Treatments for Clostridium difficile Infection.

Hannah E Burton, Stephen A Mitchell, Maureen Watt
Author Information
  1. Hannah E Burton: DRG Abacus, Bicester, UK. hburton@teamdrg.com.
  2. Stephen A Mitchell: DRG Abacus, Bicester, UK.
  3. Maureen Watt: Astellas Pharma Inc., 2000 Hillswood Drive, Chertsey, KT16 0RS, UK.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is associated with high management costs, particularly in recurrent cases. Fidaxomicin treatment results in lower recurrence rates than vancomycin and metronidazole, but has higher acquisition costs in Europe and the USA. This systematic literature review summarises economic evaluations (EEs) of fidaxomicin, vancomycin and metronidazole for treatment of CDI.
METHODS: Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library) and conference proceedings (ISPOR, ECCMID, ICAAC and IDWeek) were searched for publications reporting EEs of fidaxomicin, vancomycin and/or metronidazole in the treatment of CDI. Reference bibliographies of identified manuscripts were also reviewed. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated according to the overall population of patients with CDI, as well as in subgroups with severe CDI or recurrent CDI, or those at higher risk of recurrence or mortality.
RESULTS: Overall, 27 relevant EEs, conducted from the perspective of 12 different countries, were identified. Fidaxomicin was cost-effective versus vancomycin and/or metronidazole in 14 of 24 EEs (58.3%), vancomycin was cost-effective versus fidaxomicin and/or metronidazole in five of 27 EEs (18.5%) and metronidazole was cost-effective versus fidaxomicin and/or vancomycin in two of 13 EEs (15.4%). Fidaxomicin was cost-effective versus vancomycin in most of the EEs evaluating specific patient subgroups. Key cost-effectiveness drivers were cure rate, recurrence rate, time horizon, drug costs and length and cost of hospitalisation.
CONCLUSIONS: In most EEs, fidaxomicin was demonstrated to be cost-effective versus metronidazole and vancomycin in patients with CDI. These results have relevance to clinical practice, given the high budgetary impact of managing CDI and increasing restrictions on healthcare budgets.
OTHER: This analysis was initiated and funded by Astellas Pharma Inc.

References

  1. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 Nov;69(11):2901-12 [PMID: 25096079]
  2. Bull World Health Organ. 2015 Feb 1;93(2):118-24 [PMID: 25883405]
  3. J Med Microbiol. 2011 Aug;60(Pt 8):1213-1217 [PMID: 21349983]
  4. Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Aug;57(4):555-61 [PMID: 23704121]
  5. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012 Dec;18 Suppl 6:5-12 [PMID: 23121549]
  6. Health Technol Assess. 2004 Dec;8(49):iii-iv, 1-192 [PMID: 15544708]
  7. Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Aug;55 Suppl 2:S162-9 [PMID: 22752866]
  8. PLoS One. 2016 Feb 22;11(2):e0149521 [PMID: 26901316]
  9. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 May;31(5):431-55 [PMID: 20307191]
  10. PLoS One. 2016 Aug 24;11(8):e0161200 [PMID: 27556739]
  11. J Hosp Infect. 2010 Apr;74(4):309-18 [PMID: 20153547]
  12. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012 Apr;12(4):281-9 [PMID: 22321770]
  13. Ann Gastroenterol. 2016 Apr-Jun;29(2):147-54 [PMID: 27065726]
  14. Value Health Reg Issues. 2014 Sep;4:87-94 [PMID: 29702813]
  15. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Feb;37(2):215-8 [PMID: 26592763]
  16. BMJ. 1996 Aug 3;313(7052):275-83 [PMID: 8704542]
  17. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Apr;108(4):478-98; quiz 499 [PMID: 23439232]
  18. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014 Mar;20 Suppl 2:1-26 [PMID: 24118601]
  19. Infection. 2015 Dec;43(6):707-14 [PMID: 26123227]
  20. Value Health. 2014 Nov;17(7):A674 [PMID: 27202478]
  21. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2012 Jul;40(1):1-8 [PMID: 22398198]
  22. Antibiotics (Basel). 2015 Sep 24;4(4):411-23 [PMID: 27025632]
  23. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2015 Mar;29(1):123-34 [PMID: 25677706]
  24. N Engl J Med. 2011 Feb 3;364(5):422-31 [PMID: 21288078]
  25. Can J Hosp Pharm. 2013 Nov;66(6):361-8 [PMID: 24357868]
  26. Value Health. 2014 Nov;17(7):A673-4 [PMID: 27202472]
  27. Microb Pathog. 2016 Aug;97:59-78 [PMID: 27238460]
  28. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012 Dec;18 Suppl 6:21-7 [PMID: 23121551]
  29. Euro Surveill. 2009 Aug 27;14(34): [PMID: 19712646]
  30. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Jun;8(6):330-9 [PMID: 21502971]
  31. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015 Nov;34(11):2213-23 [PMID: 26407619]
  32. Anaerobe. 2015 Aug;34:59-73 [PMID: 25930686]
  33. Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Jun;58(11):1507-14 [PMID: 24692533]
  34. Value Health. 2014 Nov;17(7):A368 [PMID: 27200779]
  35. Med Mal Infect. 2014 Aug;44(8):354-65 [PMID: 25156678]
  36. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2016 Sep;50(8):631-7 [PMID: 26796081]
  37. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016 Feb;35(2):251-9 [PMID: 26661400]
  38. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Nov;59(11):7007-10 [PMID: 26324268]
  39. J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2015 May 6;2(2):192-206 [PMID: 37663580]
  40. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2014 Mar;5(2):69-84 [PMID: 24587892]
  41. J Hosp Infect. 2012 May;81(1):1-14 [PMID: 22498638]
  42. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012 Dec;18 Suppl 6:2-4 [PMID: 23121548]
  43. Microbiology (Reading). 2010 Nov;156(Pt 11):3354-3359 [PMID: 20724385]
  44. Infect Dis Ther. 2016 Sep;5(3):207-30 [PMID: 27470257]
  45. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2014 Mar;25(2):87-94 [PMID: 24855476]
  46. Infection. 2016 Oct;44(5):599-606 [PMID: 27062378]
  47. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 Nov;69(11):2892-900 [PMID: 25074856]
  48. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014 Dec;20(12):1343-51 [PMID: 25366338]
  49. Value Health. 2013 Mar-Apr;16(2):297-304 [PMID: 23538181]
  50. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2000 Apr;25(2):101-9 [PMID: 10849187]
  51. Value Health. 2014 Nov;17(7):A675 [PMID: 27202484]

MeSH Term

Aminoglycosides
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Clostridium Infections
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Drug Costs
Fidaxomicin
Hospitalization
Humans
Metronidazole
Recurrence
Vancomycin

Chemicals

Aminoglycosides
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Metronidazole
Vancomycin
Fidaxomicin

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0CDIvancomycinEEsmetronidazolefidaxomicincost-effectiveversusand/orcostsFidaxomicintreatmentrecurrenceClostridiumdifficilehighrecurrentresultshigheridentifiedpatientssubgroups27rateBACKGROUNDANDOBJECTIVE:infectionassociatedmanagementparticularlycaseslowerratesacquisitionEuropeUSAsystematicliteraturereviewsummariseseconomicevaluationsMETHODS:ElectronicdatabasesMEDLINEEmbaseCochraneLibraryconferenceproceedingsISPORECCMIDICAACIDWeeksearchedpublicationsreportingReferencebibliographiesmanuscriptsalsoreviewedCost-effectivenessevaluatedaccordingoverallpopulationwellsevereriskmortalityRESULTS:Overallrelevantconductedperspective12differentcountries1424583%five185%two13154%evaluatingspecificpatientKeycost-effectivenessdriverscuretimehorizondruglengthcosthospitalisationCONCLUSIONS:demonstratedrelevanceclinicalpracticegivenbudgetaryimpactmanagingincreasingrestrictionshealthcarebudgetsOTHER:analysisinitiatedfundedAstellasPharmaIncSystematicLiteratureReviewEconomicEvaluationsAntibioticTreatmentsInfection

Similar Articles

Cited By