Life events and alcohol use disorder clinical course: Modeling the dynamic association.

Marketa Krenek, Mark A Prince, Stephen A Maisto
Author Information
  1. Marketa Krenek: Department of Psychology, 430 Huntington Hall, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244-2340, USA. Electronic address: marketa.krenek@va.gov.
  2. Mark A Prince: Department of Psychology, Colorado State University, 1876 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1876, USA. Electronic address: mark.prince@colostate.edu.
  3. Stephen A Maisto: Department of Psychology, 430 Huntington Hall, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244-2340, USA. Electronic address: samaisto@syr.edu.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite over 35 years of study, the relationship between life events (LEs) and alcohol use disorder (AUD) treatment outcome lacks consistent empirical support, which may be due to a lack of theoretically driven designs and corresponding statistical analyses. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the LEs-AUD treatment outcome relationship by statistically modeling the dynamic relationship between negative LEs and alcohol use post-treatment, as it is conceptualized within the dynamic model of relapse.
METHODS: Existing longitudinal data from 417 AUD treatment-seeking adults were randomly assigned to two demographically comparable samples. One sample (N=208) was used to estimate a series of dynamic bivariate latent change score models that differentially relate latent indicators of distal and proximal negative LEs (i.e., events subjectively rated as negative) and percent heavy drinking days across 12 months. Cross-validation was conducted on the second sample (N=209).
RESULTS: Findings indicated that distal negative LEs were positively associated with a greater increase in negative LEs, but not heavy drinking, over the subsequent 12 months. Proximal negative LEs were significantly associated with subsequent increases in heavy drinking, though heavy drinking was not a determinant of change in negative LEs. These findings were cross-validated with the second sample.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides initial justification for the further study of the LEs-alcohol use relationship as it is described in the dynamic model of relapse.

Keywords

References

  1. Psychol Addict Behav. 2008 Mar;22(1):47-57 [PMID: 18298230]
  2. Subst Use Misuse. 2004 Jul;39(9):1319-39 [PMID: 15462232]
  3. Am Psychol. 2004 May-Jun;59(4):224-35 [PMID: 15149263]
  4. Addiction. 1996 Dec;91 Suppl:S155-72 [PMID: 8997790]
  5. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2005 Sep;29(2):107-15 [PMID: 16135339]
  6. Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:577-605 [PMID: 18817479]
  7. Addiction. 1996 Dec;91 Suppl:S211-29 [PMID: 8997794]
  8. Psychometrika. 2010 Jun;75(2):243-248 [PMID: 20640194]
  9. J Psychosom Res. 1967 Aug;11(2):213-8 [PMID: 6059863]
  10. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1981 Mar;38(3):335-9 [PMID: 7212965]
  11. Addiction. 1996 Dec;91 Suppl:S51-71 [PMID: 8997781]
  12. Psychol Med. 1997 Mar;27(2):301-10 [PMID: 9089823]
  13. Clin Psychol Rev. 2013 Apr;33(3):470-83 [PMID: 23454221]
  14. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1978 Oct;46(5):932-46 [PMID: 701572]
  15. Br J Addict. 1987 Feb;82(2):127-37 [PMID: 3552008]
  16. Multivariate Behav Res. 1994 Jan 1;29(1):1-32 [PMID: 26771552]
  17. Psychol Methods. 2001 Dec;6(4):352-70 [PMID: 11778677]
  18. Struct Equ Modeling. 2012 Apr 1;19(2):268-292 [PMID: 23637519]
  19. Br J Addict. 1983 Sep;78(3):269-76 [PMID: 6578829]
  20. Addiction. 1996 Dec;91 Suppl:S173-89 [PMID: 8997791]
  21. Psychol Bull. 2006 May;132(3):477-95 [PMID: 16719570]
  22. Psychol Methods. 2002 Jun;7(2):147-77 [PMID: 12090408]
  23. Psychol Addict Behav. 2011 Sep;25(3):426-38 [PMID: 21480681]
  24. Addict Behav. 2006 Jan;31(1):69-79 [PMID: 15919159]

Grants

  1. K05 AA016928/NIAAA NIH HHS
  2. T32 AA007583/NIAAA NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Alcoholism
Humans
Recurrence
Treatment Outcome

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0LEsnegativeusedynamicdrinkingstudyrelationshipeventsheavyalcoholdisordersamplelatentchangelifeAUDtreatmentoutcomemodelrelapsescoredistal12monthssecondassociatedsubsequentBACKGROUND:Despite35yearslacksconsistentempiricalsupportmayduelacktheoreticallydrivendesignscorrespondingstatisticalanalysespurposeelucidateLEs-AUDstatisticallymodelingpost-treatmentconceptualizedwithinMETHODS:Existinglongitudinaldata417treatment-seekingadultsrandomlyassignedtwodemographicallycomparablesamplesOneN=208usedestimateseriesbivariatemodelsdifferentiallyrelateindicatorsproximaliesubjectivelyratedpercentdaysacrossCross-validationconductedN=209RESULTS:FindingsindicatedpositivelygreaterincreaseProximalsignificantlyincreasesthoughdeterminantfindingscross-validatedCONCLUSIONS:providesinitialjustificationLEs-alcoholdescribedLifeclinicalcourse:ModelingassociationAlcoholBivariateanalysisHeavyNegative

Similar Articles

Cited By