Initial activation state, stimulation intensity and timing of stimulation interact in producing behavioral effects of TMS.

Juha Silvanto, Silvia Bona, Zaira Cattaneo
Author Information
  1. Juha Silvanto: Department of Psychology, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Westminster, 309 Regent Street, W1B 2HW London, UK. Electronic address: j.silvanto@westminster.ac.uk.
  2. Silvia Bona: Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy.
  3. Zaira Cattaneo: Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; Brain Connectivity Center, National Neurological Institute C. Mondino, 27100 Pavia, Italy.

Abstract

Behavioral effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) have been shown to depend on various factors, such as neural activation state, stimulation intensity, and timing of stimulation. Here we examined whether these factors interact, by applying TMS at either sub- or suprathreshold intensity (relative to phosphene threshold, PT) and at different time points during a state-dependent TMS paradigm. The state manipulation involved a behavioral task in which a visual prime (color grating) was followed by a target stimulus which could be either congruent, incongruent or partially congruent with the color and orientation of the prime. In Experiment 1, single-pulse TMS was applied over the early visual cortex (V1/V2) or Vertex (baseline) at the onset of the target stimulus - timing often used in state-dependent TMS studies. With both subthreshold and suprathreshold stimulation, TMS facilitated the detection of incongruent stimuli while not significantly affecting other stimulus types. In Experiment 2, TMS was applied at 100ms after target onset -a time window in which V1/V2 is responding to visual input. Only TMS applied at suprathreshold intensity facilitated the detection of incongruent stimuli, with no effect with subthreshold stimulation. The need for higher stimulation intensity is likely to reflect reduced susceptibility to TMS of neurons responding to visual stimulation. Furthermore, the finding that in Experiment 2 only suprathreshold TMS induced a behavioral facilitation on incongruent targets (whereas facilitations in the absence of priming have been reported with subthreshold TMS) indicates that priming, by reducing neural excitability to incongruent targets, shifts the facilitatory/inhibitory range of TMS effects.

Keywords

References

  1. Exp Brain Res. 2010 Dec;207(3-4):165-72 [PMID: 20963579]
  2. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Sep;37(8):1702-12 [PMID: 23827785]
  3. J Neurophysiol. 2007 May;97(5):3155-64 [PMID: 17344377]
  4. Exp Brain Res. 2005 Jan;160(1):118-28 [PMID: 15368086]
  5. Brain Struct Funct. 2017 Jul 11;:null [PMID: 28699028]
  6. Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 Oct;122(10):1951-5 [PMID: 21511523]
  7. J Physiol. 2003 Dec 1;553(Pt 2):665-79 [PMID: 12963791]
  8. Neuron. 2003 Aug 14;39(4):681-91 [PMID: 12925281]
  9. Neuroimage. 2010 Feb 1;49(3):2728-34 [PMID: 19853046]
  10. Cogn Neurosci. 2012;3(3-4):227-237 [PMID: 23144664]
  11. Cereb Cortex. 2002 Jun;12(6):663-9 [PMID: 12003865]
  12. Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Dec;12(12):447-54 [PMID: 18951833]
  13. Cereb Cortex. 2009 Oct;19(10):2321-5 [PMID: 19150919]
  14. Cereb Cortex. 2015 Mar;25(3):598-608 [PMID: 24084126]
  15. Psychol Res. 2007 Nov;71(6):659-66 [PMID: 16642347]
  16. Brain Stimul. 2015 Nov-Dec;8(6):1175-82 [PMID: 26169802]
  17. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Sep;45:295-304 [PMID: 25010557]
  18. Eur J Neurosci. 2008 Nov;28(9):1924-9 [PMID: 18973605]
  19. Cereb Cortex. 2006 Dec;16(12):1766-70 [PMID: 16407478]
  20. Eur J Neurosci. 2007 Mar;25(6):1874-81 [PMID: 17408427]
  21. Trends Neurosci. 2016 Nov;39(11):782-795 [PMID: 27697295]
  22. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2007;9:527-65 [PMID: 17444810]
  23. J Neurosci. 2012 Sep 5;32(36):12361-5 [PMID: 22956826]
  24. J Neurosci. 2017 Jul 26;37(30):7231-7239 [PMID: 28642285]
  25. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2011 Jun;6(3):301-10 [PMID: 21186167]
  26. Science. 1965 Sep 3;149(3688):1115-6 [PMID: 17737844]
  27. Cereb Cortex. 2010 Sep;20(9):2252-8 [PMID: 20051360]
  28. J Neurosci. 2011 Mar 2;31(9):3143-7 [PMID: 21368025]
  29. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011 Jan;35(3):516-36 [PMID: 20599555]
  30. J Neurosci. 2011 Mar 2;31(9):3290-4 [PMID: 21368040]
  31. Nat Neurosci. 2004 Jan;7(1):13-4 [PMID: 14699413]
  32. Cereb Cortex. 2010 Sep;20(9):2166-71 [PMID: 20051361]
  33. Brain Topogr. 2008 Sep;21(1):1-10 [PMID: 18791818]

Grants

  1. 336152/European Research Council

MeSH Term

Adult
Female
Humans
Male
Reaction Time
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Visual Cortex
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0TMSstimulationintensityincongruentstatesuprathresholdvisualeffectstimingbehavioraltargetstimulusExperimentappliedsubthresholdprimingfactorsneuralactivationinteracteithertimestate-dependentprimecolorcongruentV1/V2onsetfacilitateddetectionstimuli2respondingfacilitationtargetsBehavioraltranscranialmagneticshowndependvariousexaminedwhetherapplyingsub-relativephosphenethresholdPTdifferentpointsparadigmmanipulationinvolvedtaskgratingfollowedpartiallyorientation1single-pulseearlycortexVertexbaseline-oftenusedstudiessignificantlyaffectingtypes100ms-awindowinputeffectneedhigherlikelyreflectreducedsusceptibilityneuronsFurthermorefindinginducedwhereasfacilitationsabsencereportedindicatesreducingexcitabilityshiftsfacilitatory/inhibitoryrangeInitialproducingreactiontimesdependency

Similar Articles

Cited By (20)