Methods for Practising Ethics in Research and Innovation: A Literature Review, Critical Analysis and Recommendations.

Wessel Reijers, David Wright, Philip Brey, Karsten Weber, Rowena Rodrigues, Declan O'Sullivan, Bert Gordijn
Author Information
  1. Wessel Reijers: ADAPT Centre, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland. wreijers@adaptcentre.ie. ORCID
  2. David Wright: Trilateral Research and Consulting, 72 Hammersmith Rd, London, W14, UK.
  3. Philip Brey: Department of Philosophy, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522NB, Enschede, The Netherlands.
  4. Karsten Weber: Institute for Social Research and Technology Assessment (IST), OTH Regensburg, Galgenbergstraße 24, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
  5. Rowena Rodrigues: Trilateral Research and Consulting, 72 Hammersmith Rd, London, W14, UK.
  6. Declan O'Sullivan: ADAPT Centre, Department of Computer Science, Trinity College Dublin, O'Reilly Institute, Dublin 2, Ireland.
  7. Bert Gordijn: Institute of Ethics, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland.

Abstract

This paper provides a systematic literature review, analysis and discussion of methods that are proposed to practise ethics in research and innovation (R&I). Ethical considerations concerning the impacts of R&I are increasingly important, due to the quickening pace of technological innovation and the ubiquitous use of the outcomes of R&I processes in society. For this reason, several methods for practising ethics have been developed in different fields of R&I. The paper first of all presents a systematic search of academic sources that present and discuss such methods. Secondly, it provides a categorisation of these methods according to three main kinds: (1) ex ante methods, dealing with emerging technologies, (2) intra methods, dealing with technology design, and (3) ex post methods, dealing with ethical analysis of existing technologies. Thirdly, it discusses the methods by considering problems in the way they deal with the uncertainty of technological change, ethical technology design, the identification, analysis and resolving of ethical impacts of technologies and stakeholder participation. The results and discussion of our literature review are valuable for gaining an overview of the state of the art and serve as an outline of a future research agenda of methods for practising ethics in R&I.

Keywords

References

  1. BMC Med Ethics. 2012 May 20;13:10 [PMID: 22606995]
  2. Lancet Oncol. 2011 Aug;12(8):720-2 [PMID: 21807335]
  3. Sci Eng Ethics. 2001 Jul;7(3):415-28 [PMID: 11506427]
  4. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009 Oct;25(4):463-9 [PMID: 19845976]
  5. Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Jun;19(2):461-86 [PMID: 22371034]
  6. Soc Sci Med. 2011 Jul;73(1):135-44 [PMID: 21664018]
  7. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008 Fall;24(4):423-9 [PMID: 18828936]
  8. Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Oct;21(5):1159-80 [PMID: 25344842]
  9. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011 Jul;27(3):230-7 [PMID: 21736860]
  10. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011 Jan;27(1):64-70 [PMID: 21262075]
  11. Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Mar;19(1):189-206 [PMID: 22033855]
  12. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007 Winter;23(1):1-8 [PMID: 17234010]
  13. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2015 Jan;31(3):124-30 [PMID: 26134927]
  14. Med Health Care Philos. 2004;7(1):17-29 [PMID: 15139252]
  15. Hastings Cent Rep. 1995 Sep-Oct;25(5):13-9 [PMID: 8530260]
  16. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011 Oct;27(4):305-12 [PMID: 22004770]
  17. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005 Summer;21(3):312-8 [PMID: 16110710]
  18. Sci Eng Ethics. 2000 Apr;6(2):181-96 [PMID: 11273446]
  19. Biosocieties. 2013 Sep;8(3):311-335 [PMID: 24159360]
  20. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004 Winter;20(1):71-6 [PMID: 15176180]
  21. Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Jun;17(2):271-87 [PMID: 20224927]
  22. Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Jun;19(2):599-623 [PMID: 22160812]
  23. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006 Summer;22(3):307-12 [PMID: 16984058]
  24. Med Health Care Philos. 2009 Nov;12(4):453-7 [PMID: 19507050]
  25. Sci Eng Ethics. 2001 Jul;7(3):403-14 [PMID: 11506426]
  26. Poiesis Prax. 2012 Dec;9(3-4):249-270 [PMID: 23226998]
  27. Gerontologist. 2004 Dec;44(6):731-8 [PMID: 15611209]
  28. Biol Psychiatry. 1999 Oct 15;46(8):1106-19 [PMID: 10536746]
  29. Sci Eng Ethics. 2014 Dec;20(4):947-61 [PMID: 24254219]
  30. Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Feb;23(1):1-19 [PMID: 27090147]
  31. BMC Med Ethics. 2014 May 02;15:35 [PMID: 24885049]
  32. Sci Eng Ethics. 2006 Oct;12(4):663-84 [PMID: 17199143]
  33. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008 Fall;24(4):412-22 [PMID: 18828935]
  34. Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Apr;21(2):293-315 [PMID: 24728612]
  35. Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Sep;19(3):703-25 [PMID: 23224703]
  36. Life Sci Soc Policy. 2014 Dec;10:11 [PMID: 26085447]
  37. GMS Health Technol Assess. 2014 Nov 26;10:Doc04 [PMID: 25493101]
  38. Nanoethics. 2011 Aug;5(2):129-141 [PMID: 21957435]
  39. Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Feb;21(1):241-64 [PMID: 24500762]
  40. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2010 Oct;26(4):441-9 [PMID: 20923585]
  41. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011 Jan;27(1):50-4 [PMID: 21262067]
  42. Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Dec;22(6):1669-1688 [PMID: 26649432]
  43. Sci Eng Ethics. 2012 Mar;18(1):69-90 [PMID: 19949999]
  44. Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Sep;17(3):425-45 [PMID: 20589537]
  45. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2014 Jan;30(1):3-9 [PMID: 24499630]
  46. GMS Health Technol Assess. 2014 Nov 26;10:Doc05 [PMID: 25493102]
  47. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007 Winter;23(1):9-16 [PMID: 17234011]
  48. Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Jun;19(2):407-33 [PMID: 22212357]
  49. Life Sci Soc Policy. 2015;11:8 [PMID: 26260065]
  50. Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Mar;17(1):31-43 [PMID: 19936967]

MeSH Term

Ethical Analysis
Ethics, Research
Humans
Research
Technology

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0methodsR&IethicsanalysisinnovationdealingtechnologiestechnologyethicalEthicspaperprovidessystematicliteraturereviewdiscussionresearchEthicalimpactstechnologicalpractisingexdesignPractisingResearchassessmentproposedpractiseconsiderationsconcerningincreasinglyimportantduequickeningpaceubiquitoususeoutcomesprocessessocietyreasonseveraldevelopeddifferentfieldsfirstpresentssearchacademicsourcespresentdiscussSecondlycategorisationaccordingthreemainkinds:1anteemerging2intra3postexistingThirdlydiscussesconsideringproblemswaydealuncertaintychangeidentificationresolvingstakeholderparticipationresultsvaluablegainingoverviewstateartserveoutlinefutureagendaMethodsInnovation:LiteratureReviewCriticalAnalysisRecommendationsimpact

Similar Articles

Cited By (11)