Molecular, microbiological and clinical characterization of Clostridium difficile isolates from tertiary care hospitals in Colombia.

Clara Lina Salazar, Catalina Reyes, Santiago Atehortua, Patricia Sierra, Margarita María Correa, Daniel Paredes-Sabja, Emma Best, Warren N Fawley, Mark Wilcox, Ángel González
Author Information
  1. Clara Lina Salazar: Research Group in Anaerobic Bacteria (GIBA), School of Microbiology, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
  2. Catalina Reyes: Basic and Applied Microbiology Research Group (MICROBA), School of Microbiology, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
  3. Santiago Atehortua: San Vicente Fundación University Hospital, Medellín, Colombia.
  4. Patricia Sierra: Clínica León XIII, IPS Universitaria, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
  5. Margarita María Correa: Molecular Microbiology Group, School of Microbiology, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
  6. Daniel Paredes-Sabja: Microbiota-Host Interactions and Clostridia Research Group, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, at Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile.
  7. Emma Best: Departament of Microbiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom.
  8. Warren N Fawley: Departament of Microbiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom.
  9. Mark Wilcox: Departament of Microbiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom.
  10. Ángel González: Basic and Applied Microbiology Research Group (MICROBA), School of Microbiology, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia. ORCID

Abstract

In Colombia, the epidemiology and circulating genotypes of Clostridium difficile have not yet been described. Therefore, we molecularly characterized clinical isolates of C.difficile from patients with suspicion of C.difficile infection (CDI) in three tertiary care hospitals. C.difficile was isolated from stool samples by culture, the presence of A/B toxins were detected by enzyme immunoassay, cytotoxicity was tested by cell culture and the antimicrobial susceptibility determined. After DNA extraction, tcdA, tcdB and binary toxin (CDTa/CDTb) genes were detected by PCR, and PCR-ribotyping performed. From a total of 913 stool samples collected during 2013-2014, 775 were included in the study. The frequency of A/B toxins-positive samples was 9.7% (75/775). A total of 143 isolates of C.difficile were recovered from culture, 110 (76.9%) produced cytotoxic effect in cell culture, 100 (69.9%) were tcdA+/tcdB+, 11 (7.7%) tcdA-/tcdB+, 32 (22.4%) tcdA-/tcdB- and 25 (17.5%) CDTa+/CDTb+. From 37 ribotypes identified, ribotypes 591 (20%), 106 (9%) and 002 (7.9%) were the most prevalent; only one isolate corresponded to ribotype 027, four to ribotype 078 and four were new ribotypes (794,795, 804,805). All isolates were susceptible to vancomycin and metronidazole, while 85% and 7.7% were resistant to clindamycin and moxifloxacin, respectively. By multivariate analysis, significant risk factors associated to CDI were, staying in orthopedic service, exposure to third-generation cephalosporins and staying in an ICU before CDI symptoms; moreover, steroids showed to be a protector factor. These results revealed new C. difficile ribotypes and a high diversity profile circulating in Colombia different from those reported in America and European countries.

References

  1. CMAJ. 2004 Jul 6;171(1):33-8 [PMID: 15238493]
  2. J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Feb;41(2):531-4 [PMID: 12574241]
  3. Braz J Infect Dis. 2014 Nov-Dec;18(6):672-4 [PMID: 25307680]
  4. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015 Mar;21(3):248.e9-248.e16 [PMID: 25701178]
  5. PLoS One. 2015 Feb 13;10(2):e0118150 [PMID: 25679978]
  6. J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Oct;47(10):3211-7 [PMID: 19710274]
  7. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Jan;72(1):1-18 [PMID: 27659735]
  8. PLoS One. 2013 Oct 07;8(10):e75471 [PMID: 24116048]
  9. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2013 Jan;41(1):80-4 [PMID: 23148985]
  10. Infect Dis Ther. 2016 Sep;5(3):207-30 [PMID: 27470257]
  11. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016 Apr 07;2:16020 [PMID: 27158839]
  12. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2016 Jan 31;10(1):62-7 [PMID: 26829538]
  13. Euro Surveill. 2016 Jul 21;21(29): [PMID: 27470194]
  14. N Engl J Med. 2014 Mar 27;370(13):1198-208 [PMID: 24670166]
  15. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Jan;29(1):33-7 [PMID: 1993763]
  16. Anaerobe. 2009 Jun;15(3):61-4 [PMID: 19154793]
  17. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Apr;108(4):478-98; quiz 499 [PMID: 23439232]
  18. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007 Nov;77(5):802-5 [PMID: 17984329]
  19. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2011 Feb;99(2):249-55 [PMID: 20623188]
  20. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2015 Dec 01;3(1):ofv186 [PMID: 26788544]
  21. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Nov;111(11):1641-1648 [PMID: 27575714]
  22. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Apr;83(4):1396-402 [PMID: 17383346]
  23. New Microbes New Infect. 2014 May;2(3):64-71 [PMID: 25356346]
  24. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 Jul;58(7):4214-8 [PMID: 24752264]
  25. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012 Mar;67(3):742-8 [PMID: 22146873]
  26. Braz J Infect Dis. 2015 Jan-Feb;19(1):8-14 [PMID: 25179510]
  27. Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Aug;57(4):494-500 [PMID: 23645849]
  28. J Med Microbiol. 2012 Feb;61(Pt 2):169-179 [PMID: 22116982]
  29. J Med Microbiol. 2014 Feb;63(Pt 2):322-324 [PMID: 24287669]
  30. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 Feb;14(2):315-22 [PMID: 19937192]
  31. J Hosp Infect. 2012 Sep;82(1):1-12 [PMID: 22727824]
  32. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013 Apr;75(4):361-5 [PMID: 23415540]
  33. Gut Microbes. 2011 Jul-Aug;2(4):252-5 [PMID: 21804353]
  34. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016 Mar;26(3):567-71 [PMID: 26809802]
  35. Int J Med Microbiol. 2016 Nov;306(7):479-485 [PMID: 27519407]
  36. J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Sep;42(9):4316-8 [PMID: 15365032]
  37. Am J Infect Control. 2016 Oct 1;44(10):1158-1160 [PMID: 27375063]
  38. Pathology. 2012 Jun;44(4):354-6 [PMID: 22531346]
  39. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e50836 [PMID: 23236397]
  40. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 Apr;69(4):881-91 [PMID: 24324224]
  41. JAMA. 2016 Sep 20;316(11):1193-1204 [PMID: 27654605]
  42. Dig Liver Dis. 2016 May;48(5):468-472 [PMID: 26905926]
  43. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010 Jul;23(3):529-49 [PMID: 20610822]
  44. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 Aug;51(8):2716-9 [PMID: 17517836]
  45. Anaerobe. 2009 Dec;15(6):249-51 [PMID: 19723585]

MeSH Term

Aged
Bacterial Proteins
Bacterial Toxins
Clostridioides difficile
Colombia
Cross-Sectional Studies
Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous
Enterotoxins
Female
Humans
Male
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Middle Aged
Ribotyping
Risk Factors
Tertiary Care Centers

Chemicals

Bacterial Proteins
Bacterial Toxins
Enterotoxins
tcdA protein, Clostridium difficile
toxB protein, Clostridium difficile

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0difficileCisolatesculture9%ribotypesColombiaCDIsamples7%7circulatingClostridiumclinicaltertiarycarehospitalsstoolA/BdetectedcelltotalribotypefournewstayingepidemiologygenotypesyetdescribedThereforemolecularlycharacterizedpatientssuspicioninfectionthreeisolatedpresencetoxinsenzymeimmunoassaycytotoxicitytestedantimicrobialsusceptibilitydeterminedDNAextractiontcdAtcdBbinarytoxinCDTa/CDTbgenesPCRPCR-ribotypingperformed913collected2013-2014775includedstudyfrequencytoxins-positive975/775143recovered11076producedcytotoxiceffect10069tcdA+/tcdB+11tcdA-/tcdB+32224%tcdA-/tcdB-25175%CDTa+/CDTb+37identified59120%106002prevalentoneisolatecorresponded027078794795804805susceptiblevancomycinmetronidazole85%resistantclindamycinmoxifloxacinrespectivelymultivariateanalysissignificantriskfactorsassociatedorthopedicserviceexposurethird-generationcephalosporinsICUsymptomsmoreoversteroidsshowedprotectorfactorresultsrevealedhighdiversityprofiledifferentreportedAmericaEuropeancountriesMolecularmicrobiologicalcharacterization

Similar Articles

Cited By