Fecal sludge management in developing urban centers: a review on the collection, treatment, and composting.

Emmanuel Alepu Odey, Zifu Li, Xiaoqin Zhou, Loissi Kalakodio
Author Information
  1. Emmanuel Alepu Odey: School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Beijing Key Laboratory of Resource-Oriented Treatment of Industrial Pollutants, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Xueyuan 30, Beijing, 100083, People's Republic of China. lordodey1@yahoo.com.
  2. Zifu Li: School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Beijing Key Laboratory of Resource-Oriented Treatment of Industrial Pollutants, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Xueyuan 30, Beijing, 100083, People's Republic of China.
  3. Xiaoqin Zhou: School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Beijing Key Laboratory of Resource-Oriented Treatment of Industrial Pollutants, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Xueyuan 30, Beijing, 100083, People's Republic of China.
  4. Loissi Kalakodio: School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Beijing Key Laboratory of Resource-Oriented Treatment of Industrial Pollutants, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Xueyuan 30, Beijing, 100083, People's Republic of China.

Abstract

The problems posed by Fecal sludge (FS) are multidimensional because most cities rapidly urbanize, which results in the increase in population, urban settlement, and waste generation. Issues concerning health and waste treatment have continued to create alarming situations. These issues had indeed interfered with the proper steps in managing FS, which contaminates the environment. FS can be used in agriculture as fertilizer because it is an excellent source of nutrients. The recent decline in crop production due to loss of soil organic component, erosion, and nutrient runoff has generated interest in the recycling of FS into soil nutrients through stabilization and composting. However, human feces are considerably liable to spread microorganisms to other persons. Thus, sanitation, stabilization, and composting should be the main objectives of FS treatment to minimize the risk to public and environmental health. This review presents an improved FS management (FSM) and technology option for soil amendment that is grouped into three headings, namely, (1) collection, (2) treatment, and (3) composting. On the basis of the literature review, the main problems associated with the collection and treatment of FS, such as inadequate tools and improper treatment processes, are summarized, and the trends and challenges that concern the applicability of each of the technologies in developing urban centers are critically reviewed. Stabilization during pretreatment before composting is suggested as the best method to reduce pathogens in FS. Results are precisely intended to be used as a support for decisions on policies and strategies for FSM and investments for improved treatment facilities.

Keywords

References

  1. Sci Total Environ. 2016 Jan 15;541:8-22 [PMID: 26398446]
  2. Sci Total Environ. 2009 Feb 15;407(5):1517-26 [PMID: 19068268]
  3. Bioresour Technol. 2016 Jan;200:838-44 [PMID: 26590758]
  4. Bioresour Technol. 2015 Apr;182:217-224 [PMID: 25700341]
  5. Waste Manag. 2017 Jan;59:567-584 [PMID: 27838159]
  6. Sci Total Environ. 2016 Sep 15;565:200-210 [PMID: 27173838]
  7. J Environ Manage. 2011 Mar;92(3):457-71 [PMID: 21074314]
  8. Public Health. 2011 Jun;125(6):368-76 [PMID: 21616514]
  9. Soc Sci Med. 2010 Sep;71(5):935-40 [PMID: 20599311]
  10. Waste Manag. 2007;27(9):1139-43 [PMID: 16904308]
  11. J Environ Manage. 2016 Dec 15;184(Pt 3):575-584 [PMID: 27784577]
  12. Waste Manag. 2017 Jan;59:70-79 [PMID: 27751682]
  13. Chemosphere. 2017 Feb;169:271-280 [PMID: 27880926]
  14. Bioresour Technol. 2016 Dec;222:326-334 [PMID: 27728835]
  15. Chemosphere. 2011 Aug;84(6):747-58 [PMID: 21414650]
  16. Bioresour Technol. 2014 Nov;172:382-390 [PMID: 25280046]
  17. Soc Sci Med. 2017 May;180:181-192 [PMID: 27614366]
  18. Public Health. 1981 Jul;95(4):189-206 [PMID: 7267955]
  19. Sci Total Environ. 2002 Dec 2;300(1-3):87-98 [PMID: 12685474]
  20. Sci Total Environ. 2017 Nov 15;598:881-888 [PMID: 28458205]
  21. Soc Sci Med. 2012 Aug;75(4):604-11 [PMID: 22197292]
  22. Waste Manag. 2017 Mar;61:547-557 [PMID: 27955907]
  23. Water Res. 2009 Oct;43(18):4665-75 [PMID: 19660779]
  24. J Environ Manage. 2013 Jun 15;122:15-24 [PMID: 23542227]
  25. J Environ Sci (China). 2008;20(8):1018-24 [PMID: 18817084]
  26. Environ Res. 2004 Oct;96(2):219-27 [PMID: 15325882]
  27. Sci Total Environ. 2009 Feb 1;407(4):1245-56 [PMID: 19036408]
  28. Water Res. 2007 Nov;41(19):4397-402 [PMID: 17624391]
  29. Anaerobe. 2017 Apr;44:3-12 [PMID: 28062270]
  30. Chemosphere. 2014 Feb;97:16-25 [PMID: 24210550]
  31. J Biotechnol. 2017 Jul 10;253:14-22 [PMID: 28545903]
  32. Environ Int. 2005 Apr;31(3):433-44 [PMID: 15734195]
  33. J Environ Manage. 2012 Jul 30;103:9-14 [PMID: 22459066]
  34. Bioresour Technol. 2016 Aug;214:225-233 [PMID: 27136609]
  35. Sci Total Environ. 2017 Jun 1;587-588:214-222 [PMID: 28242221]
  36. Biotechnol Adv. 2012 Sep-Oct;30(5):964-78 [PMID: 22361648]
  37. Bioresour Technol. 2016 Nov;219:270-280 [PMID: 27497088]
  38. Sci Total Environ. 2017 Jul 15;590-591:40-49 [PMID: 28288420]
  39. Biotechnol Adv. 2009 Mar-Apr;27(2):145-52 [PMID: 19013227]
  40. J Environ Manage. 2017 Feb 1;187:401-415 [PMID: 27836558]
  41. J Environ Manage. 2013 Jan 15;114:423-32 [PMID: 23199825]
  42. Mar Pollut Bull. 2017 Mar 15;116(1-2):365-384 [PMID: 28117132]
  43. Water Res. 2006 Jan;40(1):75-82 [PMID: 16343581]
  44. Water Res. 2016 Sep 15;101:498-509 [PMID: 27295624]
  45. J Environ Sci (China). 2006;18(6):1088-93 [PMID: 17294947]

MeSH Term

Cities
Composting
Feces
Fertilizers
Humans
Recycling
Sewage
Urban Population
Urbanization

Chemicals

Fertilizers
Sewage

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0FStreatmentcompostingsludgeurbansoilreviewcollectionproblemswastehealthusednutrientsstabilizationsanitationmainimprovedmanagementFSMdevelopingStabilizationpretreatmentFecalposedfecalmultidimensionalcitiesrapidlyurbanizeresultsincreasepopulationsettlementgenerationIssuesconcerningcontinuedcreatealarmingsituationsissuesindeedinterferedproperstepsmanagingcontaminatesenvironmentcanagriculturefertilizerexcellentsourcerecentdeclinecropproductionduelossorganiccomponenterosionnutrientrunoffgeneratedinterestrecyclingHoweverhumanfecesconsiderablyliablespreadmicroorganismspersonsThusobjectivesminimizeriskpublicenvironmentalpresentstechnologyoptionamendmentgroupedthreeheadingsnamely123basisliteratureassociatedinadequatetoolsimproperprocessessummarizedtrendschallengesconcernapplicabilitytechnologiescenterscriticallyreviewedsuggestedbestmethodreducepathogensResultspreciselyintendedsupportdecisionspoliciesstrategiesinvestmentsfacilitiescenters:CompostingLacticacidprocessTerrapretaYeast

Similar Articles

Cited By (3)