From royal wet nurses to Facebook: The evolution of breastmilk sharing.

Kelley L Baumgartel, Larissa Sneeringer, Susan M Cohen
Author Information
  1. Kelley L Baumgartel: Targeted Research and Academic Training of Nurses in Genomics, University of Pittsburgh, School of Nursing, Department of Health Promotion and Development.
  2. Larissa Sneeringer: University Research Mentorship Program, University of Pittsburgh, School of Nursing.
  3. Susan M Cohen: University of Pittsburgh, School of Nursing, Department of Health Promotion and Development.

Abstract

Wet-nursing was an essential practice that allowed for infant survival after many mothers died in childbirth. The story of wet-nursing is complicated by both religious pressures and cultural expectations of women. It is likely that these historical practices have shaped our current social, political and legislative environments regarding breastfeeding. The aim of this article is to provide a historical perspective on the practice of wet-nursing, with a focus on: 1) social views of wet nurses, 2) breastmilk evaluation and 3) the ideal wet nurse. Historical perspectives from Ancient Egypt, Ancient Greece and Rome, 19th and 20th century America and current practices are examined. An appreciation for the evolution of breastmilk sharing provides clinicians and lactation advocates with the historical origins which provided the template for current practice as it relates to donor milk, breastfeeding culture and relevant legislation.

Keywords

References

  1. Bull N Y Acad Med. 1975 Dec;51(11):1235-49 [PMID: 1101997]
  2. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2007 Jan-Mar;20(1):119-28 [PMID: 17346435]
  3. J Perinat Educ. 2009 Spring;18(2):32-9 [PMID: 20190854]
  4. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2010 Mar;95(2):F118-20 [PMID: 20231217]
  5. Bull Hist Med. 2010 Spring;84(1):30-57 [PMID: 20632732]
  6. Semin Perinatol. 2011 Feb;35(1):29-33 [PMID: 21255704]
  7. Pediatrics. 2012 Mar;129(3):e827-41 [PMID: 22371471]
  8. Neonatology. 2012;102(2):89-97 [PMID: 22653040]
  9. Neonatology. 2012;102(3):222-8 [PMID: 22833013]
  10. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2013 Jul;42(4):451-61 [PMID: 23772947]
  11. Breastfeed Med. 2013 Dec;8(6):474-8 [PMID: 23971685]
  12. Am J Hum Biol. 2013 Nov-Dec;25(6):770-9 [PMID: 24105777]
  13. Pediatrics. 2013 Nov;132(5):e1227-35 [PMID: 24144714]
  14. Breastfeed Med. 2014 Apr;9(3):128-34 [PMID: 24490980]
  15. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2014 Nov-Dec;39(6):369-74 [PMID: 25333804]
  16. Soc Sci Med. 2014 Dec;122:140-7 [PMID: 25441326]
  17. J Hum Lact. 2016 May;32(2):229-37 [PMID: 26905342]
  18. Br Foreign Med Chir Rev. 1858 Oct;22(44):321-336 [PMID: 30163919]

Grants

  1. T32 NR009759/NINR NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Breast Feeding
Female
History, 15th Century
History, 16th Century
History, 17th Century
History, 18th Century
History, 19th Century
History, 20th Century
History, 21st Century
History, Ancient
History, Medieval
Humans
Infant Care
Infant Food
Infant Welfare
Infant, Newborn
Milk Banks
Milk, Human

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0breastmilkwetpracticehistoricalcurrentbreastfeedingsharingwet-nursingpracticessocialnursesnurseAncientevolutiondonormilkWet-nursingessentialallowedinfantsurvivalmanymothersdiedchildbirthstorycomplicatedreligiouspressuresculturalexpectationswomenlikelyshapedpoliticallegislativeenvironmentsregardingaimarticleprovideperspectivefocuson:1views2evaluation3idealHistoricalperspectivesEgyptGreeceRome19th20thcenturyAmericaexaminedappreciationprovidesclinicianslactationadvocatesoriginsprovidedtemplaterelatesculturerelevantlegislationroyalFacebook:

Similar Articles

Cited By