The Soybean Gene Restricts Nodulation by USDA193.

Yinglun Fan, Jinge Liu, Shanhua Lyu, Qi Wang, Shengming Yang, Hongyan Zhu
Author Information
  1. Yinglun Fan: College of Agriculture, Liaocheng UniversityLiaocheng, China.
  2. Jinge Liu: Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Kentucky, LexingtonKY, United States.
  3. Shanhua Lyu: College of Agriculture, Liaocheng UniversityLiaocheng, China.
  4. Qi Wang: Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Kentucky, LexingtonKY, United States.
  5. Shengming Yang: Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Kentucky, LexingtonKY, United States.
  6. Hongyan Zhu: Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Kentucky, LexingtonKY, United States.

Abstract

is a fast-growing rhizobial species that can establish a nitrogen-fixing symbiosis with a wide range of legume species including soybeans (). In soybeans, this interaction shows a high level of specificity such that particular strains nodulate only a limited set of plant genotypes. Here we report the identification of a dominant gene in soybeans that restricts nodulation with USDA193. Genetic mapping in an F2 population revealed co-segregation of the underlying locus with the previously cloned gene. The allele encodes a member of the Toll-interleukin receptor/nucleotide-binding site/leucine-rich repeat class of plant resistance proteins that restricts nodulation by strains USDA257 and USDA205, and an allelic variant of this gene also restricts nodulation by USDA122. By means of complementation tests and CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene knockouts, we demonstrate that the allele also is responsible for resistance to nodulation by USDA193. Therefore, the allele likely provides broad-spectrum resistance to nodulation by many and strains in soybeans.

Keywords

References

  1. Nature. 2015 Jul 16;523(7560):308-12 [PMID: 26153863]
  2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Oct 26;107(43):18735-40 [PMID: 20937853]
  3. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007 Aug;5(8):619-33 [PMID: 17632573]
  4. Genome Res. 2002 Sep;12(9):1305-15 [PMID: 12213767]
  5. Nature. 1990 Apr 19;344(6268):781-4 [PMID: 2330031]
  6. Nature. 2003 Oct 9;425(6958):585-92 [PMID: 14534578]
  7. Science. 2014 Nov 28;346(6213):1258096 [PMID: 25430774]
  8. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013 Feb;79(3):1048-51 [PMID: 23204412]
  9. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2003 Jul;16(7):617-25 [PMID: 12848427]
  10. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2008 Aug;285(1):1-9 [PMID: 18616593]
  11. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2009 Jun;295(1):88-95 [PMID: 19473255]
  12. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jun 27;114(26):6854-6859 [PMID: 28607058]
  13. Plant Physiol. 2016 Jan;170(1):26-32 [PMID: 26582727]
  14. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015 Oct;81(19):6710-7 [PMID: 26187957]
  15. BMC Plant Biol. 2014 Nov 29;14:327 [PMID: 25432517]
  16. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000 Apr;13(4):475-9 [PMID: 10755312]
  17. Trends Microbiol. 2004 Dec;12(12):555-61 [PMID: 15539115]
  18. J Bacteriol. 2000 Oct;182(20):5641-52 [PMID: 11004160]
  19. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2010 Mar;34(2):150-70 [PMID: 20070373]
  20. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009 Apr;7(4):312-20 [PMID: 19270720]
  21. Annu Rev Genet. 2011;45:119-44 [PMID: 21838550]
  22. Nat Protoc. 2007;2(4):948-52 [PMID: 17446894]
  23. Plant Cell. 1999 Mar;11(3):495-506 [PMID: 10072407]
  24. Cell Microbiol. 2009 Mar;11(3):381-8 [PMID: 19134114]
  25. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2007;45:289-306 [PMID: 17430087]
  26. Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Dec 22;274(1629):3119-26 [PMID: 17939985]
  27. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jun 27;114(26):6848-6853 [PMID: 28607056]
  28. Plant Cell. 2001 Jan;13(1):163-78 [PMID: 11158537]
  29. Science. 2003 Oct 24;302(5645):630-3 [PMID: 12947035]
  30. J Biosci. 2014 Jun;39(3):513-7 [PMID: 24845514]
  31. Plant Physiol. 1997 Oct;115(2):351-359 [PMID: 12223813]
  32. Science. 1982 Mar 26;215(4540):1631-2 [PMID: 17788491]
  33. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2000 Mar;64(1):180-201 [PMID: 10704479]
  34. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015 Sep 1;81(17):5812-9 [PMID: 26092458]
  35. BMC Plant Biol. 2014 Jun 16;14:167 [PMID: 24934080]
  36. Plant Cell Physiol. 2016 Aug;57(8):1791-800 [PMID: 27373538]
  37. EMBO J. 2007 Sep 5;26(17 ):3923-35 [PMID: 17690687]
  38. Mol Ecol. 2004 Aug;13(8):2435-44 [PMID: 15245415]
  39. Cell Microbiol. 2012 Mar;14(3):334-42 [PMID: 22168434]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0nodulationsoybeansgenesymbiosisstrainsrestrictsUSDA193alleleresistancerhizobialspeciesspecificityplantalsofast-growingcanestablishnitrogen-fixingwiderangelegumeincludinginteractionshowshighlevelparticularnodulatelimitedsetgenotypesreportidentificationdominantGeneticmappingF2populationrevealedco-segregationunderlyinglocuspreviouslyclonedencodesmemberToll-interleukinreceptor/nucleotide-bindingsite/leucine-richrepeatclassproteinsUSDA257USDA205allelicvariantUSDA122meanscomplementationtestsCRISPR/Cas9-mediatedknockoutsdemonstrateresponsibleThereforelikelyprovidesbroad-spectrummanySoybeanGeneRestrictsNodulationnitrogenfixationsoybean

Similar Articles

Cited By