Spontaneous reoccurrence of "scooping", a wild tool-use behaviour, in naïve chimpanzees.

Elisa Bandini, Claudio Tennie
Author Information
  1. Elisa Bandini: School of Psychology, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
  2. Claudio Tennie: School of Psychology, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Abstract

Modern human technological culture depends on social learning. A widespread assumption for chimpanzee tool-use cultures is that they, too, are dependent on social learning. However, we provide evidence to suggest that individual learning, rather than social learning, is the driver behind determining the form of these behaviours within and across individuals. Low-fidelity social learning instead merely facilitates the reinnovation of these behaviours, and thus helps homogenise the behaviour across chimpanzees, creating the population-wide patterns observed in the wild (what here we call "socially mediated serial reinnovations"). This is the main prediction of the Zone of Latent Solutions (ZLS) hypothesis. This study directly tested the ZLS hypothesis on algae scooping, a wild chimpanzee tool-use behaviour. We provided naïve chimpanzees ( = 14, Mage = 31.33, SD = 10.09) with ecologically relevant materials of the wild behaviour but, crucially, without revealing any information on the behavioural form required to accomplish this task. This study found that naïve chimpanzees expressed the same behavioural form as their wild counterparts, suggesting that, as the ZLS theory predicts, individual learning is the driver behind the frequency of this behavioural form. As more behaviours are being found to be within chimpanzee's ZLS, this hypothesis now provides a parsimonious explanation for chimpanzee tool cultures.

Keywords

References

  1. Cognition. 2011 May;119(2):301-6 [PMID: 21315325]
  2. Am J Primatol. 2014 Jul;76(7):649-57 [PMID: 24482055]
  3. Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Feb 24;283(1825):20152402 [PMID: 26911964]
  4. Science. 2003 Jan 3;299(5603):102-5 [PMID: 12511649]
  5. Anim Cogn. 2015 Jan;18(1):325-31 [PMID: 25199480]
  6. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Nov 12;363(1509):3477-88 [PMID: 18799418]
  7. Nature. 1999 Jun 17;399(6737):682-5 [PMID: 10385119]
  8. Anim Cogn. 2001 Nov;4(3-4):305-13 [PMID: 24777521]
  9. PLoS One. 2016 Sep 07;11(9):e0160483 [PMID: 27603668]
  10. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Aug 27;364(1528):2405-15 [PMID: 19620111]
  11. Sci Adv. 2017 Apr 26;3(4):e1602750 [PMID: 28508047]
  12. Primates. 2004 Apr;45(2):113-8 [PMID: 15095043]
  13. Evol Hum Behav. 2015 Jan;36(1):65-72 [PMID: 27053916]
  14. Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Jan 22;275(1631):187-93 [PMID: 17971322]
  15. Am J Primatol. 2004 Dec;64(4):359-66 [PMID: 15580579]
  16. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e55768 [PMID: 23383278]
  17. Nature. 2005 Sep 29;437(7059):737-40 [PMID: 16113685]
  18. Nature. 2005 Jan 13;433(7022):121 [PMID: 15650729]
  19. Am J Primatol. 2015 Oct;77(10):1109-21 [PMID: 26119509]
  20. Sci Rep. 2017 May 11;7(1):1788 [PMID: 28496154]
  21. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Aug 27;364(1528):2417-28 [PMID: 19620112]
  22. Sci Rep. 2016 Oct 11;6:34783 [PMID: 27725706]
  23. Psychol Sci. 2009 Dec;20(12):1478-83 [PMID: 19891752]
  24. Anim Cogn. 2006 Oct;9(4):317-34 [PMID: 17024509]
  25. Am J Primatol. 2008 Jun;70(6):584-93 [PMID: 18330896]
  26. Science. 2012 Mar 2;335(6072):1114-8 [PMID: 22383851]
  27. Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Aug;35(4):242-3 [PMID: 22697907]
  28. J Comp Psychol. 1998 Sep;112(3):270-81 [PMID: 9770315]
  29. Nature. 2016 Sep 14;537(7620):403-7 [PMID: 27629645]
  30. Behav Brain Sci. 2015 ;38:e31 [PMID: 24856634]
  31. J Comp Psychol. 2001 Sep;115(3):272-81 [PMID: 11594496]
  32. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Nov 7;268(1482):2189-93 [PMID: 11674865]
  33. PLoS Biol. 2014 Sep 30;12(9):e1001960 [PMID: 25268798]
  34. Sci Rep. 2015 Jun 16;5:11356 [PMID: 26079292]
  35. Cognition. 2017 Nov;168:335-343 [PMID: 28783499]
  36. Biol Lett. 2014 Nov;10(11):20140508 [PMID: 25392310]
  37. J Comp Psychol. 2000 Dec;114(4):381-91 [PMID: 11149542]
  38. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 Apr 29;362(1480):603-20 [PMID: 17255007]
  39. Am J Primatol. 2017 Mar;79(3):1-7 [PMID: 27813136]
  40. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e41548 [PMID: 22905102]
  41. Primates. 2013 Oct;54(4):361-70 [PMID: 23665925]
  42. J Hum Evol. 1999 Jun;36(6):719-41 [PMID: 10330335]
  43. Science. 2002 Aug 9;297(5583):981 [PMID: 12169726]
  44. J Comp Psychol. 1996 Mar;110(1):3-14 [PMID: 8851548]
  45. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Apr 2;99(7):4436-41 [PMID: 11891325]
  46. Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Apr;24(2):309-24; discussion 324-82 [PMID: 11530544]
  47. Science. 2007 Sep 7;317(5843):1360-6 [PMID: 17823346]
  48. Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Oct;21(10):542-7 [PMID: 16806574]
  49. Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Feb 7;278(1704):408-16 [PMID: 20719777]
  50. Primates. 2009 Jan;50(1):23-36 [PMID: 19137390]
  51. Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Jul 22;277(1691):2105-11 [PMID: 20236972]
  52. J Hum Evol. 2007 Apr;52(4):420-33 [PMID: 17194468]
  53. Learn Behav. 2004 Feb;32(1):36-52 [PMID: 15161139]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0learningwildsocialtool-useformbehaviourchimpanzeesZLSchimpanzeebehaviourshypothesisnaïvebehaviouralculturesindividualdriverbehindwithinacrossZonestudyscooping=foundModernhumantechnologicalculturedependswidespreadassumptiondependentHoweverprovideevidencesuggestratherdeterminingindividualsLow-fidelityinsteadmerelyfacilitatesreinnovationthushelpshomogenisecreatingpopulation-widepatternsobservedcall"sociallymediatedserialreinnovations"mainpredictionLatentSolutionsdirectlytestedalgaeprovided = 14Mage3133SD1009ecologicallyrelevantmaterialscruciallywithoutrevealinginformationrequiredaccomplishtaskexpressedcounterpartssuggestingtheorypredictsfrequencychimpanzee'snowprovidesparsimoniousexplanationtoolSpontaneousreoccurrence"scooping"AlgaeChimpanzeeIndividualInnovationSociallatentsolutions

Similar Articles

Cited By