Multilaboratory Evaluation of a Novel Lateral Flow Immunochromatographic Assay for Confirming Isolation of Mycobacterium bovis from Veterinary Diagnostic Specimens.

Linda D Stewart, Lyanne McCallan, James McNair, Adrian McGoldrick, Rowan Morris, Jean-Louis Moyen, Lucía De Juan Ferré, Beatriz Romero, Elena Alonso, Sven D C Parsons, Paul Van Helden, Flábio R Araújo, Irene R Grant
Author Information
  1. Linda D Stewart: Institute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
  2. Lyanne McCallan: Veterinary Sciences Division, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
  3. James McNair: Veterinary Sciences Division, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
  4. Adrian McGoldrick: Animal and Plant Health Agency Veterinary Inspection Centre Starcross, Exeter, United Kingdom.
  5. Rowan Morris: Animal and Plant Health Agency Veterinary Inspection Centre Starcross, Exeter, United Kingdom.
  6. Jean-Louis Moyen: Laboratoire Départemental d'Analyse et de Recherche de la Dordogne, Coulounieix-Chamiers, France.
  7. Lucía De Juan Ferré: Centro de Vigilancia Sanitaria Veterinaria (VISAVET), Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
  8. Beatriz Romero: Centro de Vigilancia Sanitaria Veterinaria (VISAVET), Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
  9. Elena Alonso: Laboratorio Regional de Sanidad Animal de la Junta de Castilla y León, León, Spain.
  10. Sven D C Parsons: DST/NRF Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Tuberculosis Research/SAMRC Centre for TB Research/Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, South Africa. ORCID
  11. Paul Van Helden: DST/NRF Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Tuberculosis Research/SAMRC Centre for TB Research/Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, South Africa.
  12. Flábio R Araújo: Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA Gado de Corte), Campo Grande, Brazil.
  13. Irene R Grant: Institute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom i.grant@qub.ac.uk. ORCID

Abstract

A novel lateral flow immunochromatographic device (LFD) was evaluated in several veterinary diagnostic laboratories. It was confirmed to be specific for and cells. The performance of the novel LFD was assessed relative to the confirmatory tests routinely applied after culture (spoligotyping or quantitative PCR [qPCR]) in each laboratory; liquid (MGIT or BacT/Alert) and/or solid (Stonebrink, Coletsos, or Lowenstein-Jensen) cultures were tested. In comparison to spoligotyping of acid-fast-positive MGIT cultures, percent agreement between positive LFD and spoligotyping results was excellent in two United Kingdom laboratories (97.7 to 100%) but lower in the Spanish context (76%), where spoligotyping was applied to MGIT cultures previously confirmed to be positive for complex (MTBC) by qPCR. Certain spoligotypes of and were not detected by the LFD in Spanish MGIT cultures. Compared to qPCR confirmation, the agreement between positive LFD and qPCR results was 42.3% and 50% for BacT/Alert and MGIT liquid cultures, respectively, and for solid cultures, it ranged from 11.1 to 89.2%, depending on the solid medium employed (Coletsos, 11.1%; Lowenstein-Jensen, 55.6%; Stonebrinks, 89.2%). Correlation between the novel LFD and BD MGIT TBc Identification test results was excellent when 190 MGIT cultures were tested ( = 0.9791; < 0.0001), with the added benefit that was differentiated from another MTBC species in one MGIT culture by the novel LFD. This multilaboratory evaluation demonstrated the novel LFD's potential utility as a rapid test to confirm isolation of and from veterinary specimens following culture.

Keywords

References

  1. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2001;81(1-2):169-75 [PMID: 11463239]
  2. J Microbiol Methods. 2011 Feb;84(2):255-7 [PMID: 21167879]
  3. BMC Vet Res. 2017 May 12;13(1):131 [PMID: 28499434]
  4. Vet Rec. 2015 Sep 5;177(9):224-32 [PMID: 26338937]
  5. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011 Mar;17(3):532-5 [PMID: 21392452]
  6. Vet Microbiol. 2006 Feb 25;112(2-4):119-26 [PMID: 16343818]
  7. J Infect. 2013 Nov;67(5):369-77 [PMID: 23796870]
  8. J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Sep;36(9):2793-4 [PMID: 9742014]
  9. Vet Microbiol. 2011 Jul 5;151(1-2):170-8 [PMID: 21440387]
  10. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2010 Aug 1;57(4):205-20 [PMID: 20561288]
  11. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:398108 [PMID: 24587985]
  12. Vet Microbiol. 1998 Mar 15;61(1-2):71-80 [PMID: 9646467]
  13. J Wildl Dis. 2014 Apr;50(2):180-7 [PMID: 24484478]
  14. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006 Sep;4(9):670-81 [PMID: 16912712]
  15. PLoS One. 2015 Feb 06;10(2):e0117103 [PMID: 25658691]
  16. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2006 May-Jul;86(3-4):330-5 [PMID: 16644282]
  17. Vet Microbiol. 2010 Feb 24;141(1-2):89-95 [PMID: 19720476]
  18. J Clin Microbiol. 2013 May;51(5):1381-8 [PMID: 23408688]
  19. Res Vet Sci. 2014 Oct;97 Suppl:S5-S19 [PMID: 24630673]
  20. Vet Res. 2005 Jan-Feb;36(1):43-52 [PMID: 15610722]
  21. Braz J Microbiol. 2014 Aug 29;45(2):633-40 [PMID: 25242951]
  22. J Clin Microbiol. 2011 Mar;49(3):802-7 [PMID: 21191055]
  23. PLoS One. 2014 Mar 11;9(3):e91023 [PMID: 24618787]
  24. Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74 [PMID: 843571]
  25. Vet Microbiol. 2006 Feb 25;112(2-4):101-9 [PMID: 16388921]
  26. J Med Microbiol. 2010 Mar;59(Pt 3):285-94 [PMID: 19959631]
  27. Res Vet Sci. 2014 Oct;97 Suppl:S69-77 [PMID: 25256964]
  28. PLoS One. 2014 Mar 13;9(3):e90334 [PMID: 24625670]
  29. J Clin Microbiol. 2011 May;49(5):1939-42 [PMID: 21411594]

MeSH Term

Animals
Cattle
Chromatography, Affinity
Molecular Diagnostic Techniques
Mycobacterium bovis
Sensitivity and Specificity
Spain
Tuberculosis, Bovine
United Kingdom
Veterinary Medicine

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0MGITLFDculturesnovelspoligotypingveterinaryculturesolidpositiveresultsqPCRMycobacteriumlateralflowimmunochromatographiclaboratoriesconfirmedappliedliquidBacT/AlertColetsosLowenstein-JensentestedagreementexcellentSpanishMTBC11892%test0bovisdetectiondeviceevaluatedseveraldiagnosticspecificcellsperformanceassessedrelativeconfirmatorytestsroutinelyquantitativePCR[qPCR]laboratoryand/orStonebrinkcomparisonacid-fast-positivepercenttwoUnitedKingdom977100%lowercontext76%previouslycomplexCertainspoligotypesdetectedComparedconfirmation423%50%respectivelyranged1dependingmediumemployed1%556%StonebrinksCorrelationBDTBcIdentification190=9791<0001addedbenefitdifferentiatedanotherspeciesonemultilaboratoryevaluationdemonstratedLFD'spotentialutilityrapidconfirmisolationspecimensfollowingMultilaboratoryEvaluationNovelLateralFlowImmunochromatographicAssayConfirmingIsolationVeterinaryDiagnosticSpecimenscapraesensitivityspecificityassaydiagnostics

Similar Articles

Cited By