Bacterial biota of women with bacterial vaginosis treated with lactoferrin: an open prospective randomized trial.

Alessandra Pino, Giuliana Giunta, Cinzia L Randazzo, Salvatore Caruso, Cinzia Caggia, Antonio Cianci
Author Information
  1. Alessandra Pino: Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment (Di3A), University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
  2. Giuliana Giunta: Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, Gynecological Clinic, University of Catania, Policlinico Universitario, Catania, Italy.
  3. Cinzia L Randazzo: Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment (Di3A), University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
  4. Salvatore Caruso: Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, Gynecological Clinic, University of Catania, Policlinico Universitario, Catania, Italy. ORCID
  5. Cinzia Caggia: Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment (Di3A), University of Catania, Catania, Italy. ORCID
  6. Antonio Cianci: Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, Gynecological Clinic, University of Catania, Policlinico Universitario, Catania, Italy.

Abstract

Bacterial vaginosis is the most frequent condition associated to the vaginal microbiota imbalance, affecting about the 40-50% of women in the world. Even if antibiotics are effcetive for bacterial vaginosis treatment a long-term recurrence rates, higher than 70%, is recorded. Lactoferrin is an iron-binding glycoprotein with bacteriostatic and bactericidal properties. It owns the ability to protect the host against infection, by binding and regulating the iron needed for the bacterial proliferation. : The present study was an open prospective randomized trial (registration no. SHI-EVE-2014.01) aimed at characterizing the bacterial biota of women affected by bacterial vaginosis (BV) and assessing the effects of two different lactoferrin concentrations (100 mg and 200 mg vaginal pessaries) on the composition and dynamics of the vaginal bacterial biota. : Sixty women with BV were recruited and randomized into two groups to receive lactoferrin pessaries for 10 days. Clinical evaluation was based on Amsel criteria and Nugent scores. Culture-dependent methods and Ion Torrent PGM sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene were applied to study in depth the overall structure of the vaginal bacterial biota and its dynamics during the treatment. : Vaginal lactoferrin administration modified the vaginal microbiota composition in patients with BV. During treatment, both 100 mg and 200 mg lactoferrin vaginal pessaries significantly decreased the occurrence of bacteria associated with BV, such as , , and , and increased the occurrence species. The bacterial biota balance was maintained up to 2 weeks after treatment only in women treated with 200 mg lactoferrin pessaries. : This study indicates that lactoferrin could be proposed as an alternative therapeutic approach for BV. Our data showed, for the first time, the dominance of species during and after vaginal lactoferrin treatment.

Keywords

References

  1. BJOG. 2001 May;108(5):439-50 [PMID: 11368127]
  2. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996 Mar;62(3):1089-92 [PMID: 8975601]
  3. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 May;194(5):1283-9 [PMID: 16647911]
  4. Microbiology. 2000 Mar;146 ( Pt 3):547-9 [PMID: 10746758]
  5. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Feb;29(2):297-301 [PMID: 1706728]
  6. Sex Transm Dis. 1999 Mar;26(3):137-42 [PMID: 10100770]
  7. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Mar;170(3):759-64 [PMID: 8141197]
  8. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Apr;192(4):1038-43 [PMID: 15846177]
  9. Science. 1998 Jul 17;281(5375):363, 365 [PMID: 9705713]
  10. J Infect Dis. 2006 Jun 1;193(11):1478-86 [PMID: 16652274]
  11. Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Jun;81(6):963-7 [PMID: 8497364]
  12. Acta Biochim Pol. 2015;62(4):713-20 [PMID: 26601325]
  13. Mol Med Rep. 2012 Jan;5(1):162-6 [PMID: 21922138]
  14. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2012;66:371-89 [PMID: 22746335]
  15. BMC Infect Dis. 2011 Aug 19;11:223 [PMID: 21854593]
  16. Biochimie. 2009 Jan;91(1):11-8 [PMID: 18539153]
  17. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003 Jul 1;109(1):67-71 [PMID: 12818447]
  18. BMC Genomics. 2012 Jul 24;13:341 [PMID: 22827831]
  19. J Leukoc Biol. 1992 Apr;51(4):343-9 [PMID: 1564398]
  20. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Oct;191(4):1124-9 [PMID: 15507930]
  21. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2008 Mar;26(3):160-7 [PMID: 18358215]
  22. Front Microbiol. 2012 Nov 19;3:392 [PMID: 23181058]
  23. J Clin Med Res. 2013 Aug;5(4):309-15 [PMID: 23864922]
  24. Am J Med. 1983 Jan;74(1):14-22 [PMID: 6600371]
  25. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Dec;209(6):505-23 [PMID: 23659989]
  26. Biochem Cell Biol. 2017 Feb;95(1):34-40 [PMID: 28094551]
  27. Infect Immun. 1980 Jun;28(3):893-8 [PMID: 6772569]
  28. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011 Jun;9(6):414-26 [PMID: 21572458]
  29. Front Physiol. 2015 Mar 25;6:81 [PMID: 25859220]
  30. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2016 Apr;29(2):223-38 [PMID: 26864580]
  31. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jan;198(1):97.e1-6 [PMID: 18005928]
  32. Hum Reprod. 2001 Sep;16(9):1809-13 [PMID: 11527880]
  33. PLoS One. 2014 Aug 22;9(8):e105998 [PMID: 25148517]
  34. BMC Genomics. 2010 Sep 07;11:488 [PMID: 20819230]
  35. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2011 Mar;61(2):153-8 [PMID: 21118312]
  36. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jan;37(Database issue):D141-5 [PMID: 19004872]
  37. Blood. 1992 Jul 1;80(1):235-40 [PMID: 1535239]
  38. BJOG. 2017 Jan;124(1):61-69 [PMID: 27396541]
  39. Trends Microbiol. 2005 Jan;13(1):34-40 [PMID: 15639630]
  40. J Infect Dis. 2016 Aug 15;214 Suppl 1:S14-20 [PMID: 27449869]
  41. PLoS One. 2013 Jul 15;8(7):e68739 [PMID: 23869230]
  42. J Infect Dis. 1992 Dec;166(6):1375-8 [PMID: 1331250]
  43. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis. 2008;2008:256490 [PMID: 19343185]
  44. Immunol Lett. 1991 Sep;30(1):119-23 [PMID: 1683650]
  45. APMIS. 2005 Feb;113(2):81-90 [PMID: 15723682]
  46. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Winter;2(1):28-37 [PMID: 19399292]
  47. Trends Microbiol. 2001 Jan;9(1):34-9 [PMID: 11166241]
  48. J Reprod Med. 2000 Nov;45(11):889-96 [PMID: 11127100]
  49. Bioinformatics. 2010 Oct 1;26(19):2460-1 [PMID: 20709691]
  50. Clin Evid. 2005 Jun;(13):1968-78 [PMID: 16135317]
  51. J Appl Microbiol. 2006 Sep;101(3):647-54 [PMID: 16907815]
  52. J Infect Dis. 2010 Jan 1;201(1):81-91 [PMID: 19961304]
  53. Dan Med J. 2014 Apr;61(4):B4830 [PMID: 24814599]
  54. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012;2012:251364 [PMID: 22829749]
  55. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2009 Nov;7(9):1109-24 [PMID: 19883331]
  56. N Engl J Med. 2005 Nov 3;353(18):1899-911 [PMID: 16267321]
  57. Int J Infect Dis. 2002 Mar;6 Suppl 1:S47-53 [PMID: 12044289]
  58. J Infect Dis. 1996 Nov;174(5):1058-63 [PMID: 8896509]
  59. Biochem Cell Biol. 2017 Feb;95(1):31-33 [PMID: 28140620]
  60. Rev Latinoam Microbiol. 2005 Jul-Dec;47(3-4):102-11 [PMID: 17061535]
  61. Clin Infect Dis. 2002 Oct 15;35(Suppl 2):S152-72 [PMID: 12353202]
  62. J Immunol. 1985 Jun;134(6):4176-83 [PMID: 3886800]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0vaginalbacteriallactoferrinwomentreatmentbiotaBVvaginosis:pessariesmicrobiotastudyrandomizedtrial200 mgBacterialassociatedinfectionopenprospectivetwo100 mgcompositiondynamicsIonTorrent16SVaginaloccurrencespeciestreatedfrequentconditionimbalanceaffecting40-50%worldEvenantibioticseffcetivelong-termrecurrencerateshigher70%recordedLactoferriniron-bindingglycoproteinbacteriostaticbactericidalpropertiesownsabilityprotecthostbindingregulatingironneededproliferationpresentregistrationSHI-EVE-201401aimedcharacterizingaffectedassessingeffectsdifferentconcentrationsSixtyrecruitedgroupsreceive10 daysClinicalevaluationbasedAmselcriteriaNugentscoresCulture-dependentmethodsPGMsequencingrRNAgeneapplieddepthoverallstructureadministrationmodifiedpatientssignificantlydecreasedbacteriaincreasedbalancemaintained2 weeksindicatesproposedalternativetherapeuticapproachdatashowedfirsttimedominancelactoferrin:rDNALhelveticusLactobacillussppvivo

Similar Articles

Cited By