The impact of a referral card-based intervention on intimate partner violence, psychosocial health, help-seeking and safety behaviour during pregnancy and postpartum: a randomized controlled trial.

An-Sofie Van Parys, Ellen Deschepper, Kristien Roelens, Marleen Temmerman, Hans Verstraelen
Author Information
  1. An-Sofie Van Parys: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, International Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, De Pintelaan 185, UZP 114, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. ansofie.vanparys@ugent.be.
  2. Ellen Deschepper: Department of Public Health, Biostatistics Unit, Ghent University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, De Pintelaan 185, 3K3, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
  3. Kristien Roelens: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, International Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, De Pintelaan 185, P4, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
  4. Marleen Temmerman: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, International Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, De Pintelaan 185, P4, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
  5. Hans Verstraelen: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, International Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, De Pintelaan 185, P4, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the impact of a referral-based intervention in a prospective cohort of women disclosing intimate partner violence (IPV) on the prevalence of violence, and associated outcomes psychosocial health, help-seeking and safety behaviour during and after pregnancy.
METHODS: Women seeking antenatal care in eleven Belgian hospitals were consecutively invited from June 2010 to October 2012, to participate in a single-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) and handed a questionnaire. Participants willing to be interviewed and reporting IPV victimisation were randomised. In the Intervention Group (IG) participants received a referral card with contact details of services providing assistance and tips to increase safety behaviour. Participants in the Control Group (CG) received a "thank you" card. Follow-up data were obtained through telephone interview at an average of 10 months after receipt of the card.
RESULTS: At follow-up (n = 189), 66.7% (n = 126) of the participants reported IPV victimisation. Over the study-period, the prevalence of IPV victimisation decreased by 31.4% (P < 0.001), psychosocial health increased significantly (5.4/140, P < 0.001), 23.8% (n = 46/193) of the women sought formal help, 70.5% (n = 136/193) sought informal help, and 31.3% (n = 60/192) took at least one safety measure. We observed no statistically significant differences between the IG and CG, however. Adjusted for psychosocial health at baseline, the perceived helpfulness of the referral card seemed to be larger in the IG. Both the questionnaire and the interview were perceived to be significantly more helpful than the referral card itself (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Asking questions can be helpful even for types of IPV of low severity, although simply distributing a referral card may not qualify as the ideal intervention. Future interventions should be multifaceted, delineate different types of violence, controlling for measurement reactivity and designing a tailored intervention programme adjusted to the specific needs of couples experiencing IPV.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered with the U.S. National Institutes of Health ClinicalTrials.gov registry on July 6, 2010 under identifier NCT01158690 ).

Keywords

Associated Data

ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT01158690

References

  1. Am J Prev Med. 2000 Nov;19(4):316-20 [PMID: 11064237]
  2. Patient Educ Couns. 2001 May;43(2):211-7 [PMID: 11369155]
  3. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002 Sep;78 Suppl 1:S5-14 [PMID: 12429433]
  4. JAMA. 2003 Feb 5;289(5):589-600 [PMID: 12578492]
  5. Matern Child Health J. 2003 Mar;7(1):31-43 [PMID: 12710798]
  6. J Marital Fam Ther. 2003 Jul;29(3):407-26 [PMID: 12870412]
  7. Am Psychol. 1992 Sep;47(9):1102-14 [PMID: 1329589]
  8. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2004 Jan;5(1):47-64 [PMID: 15006296]
  9. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004 Mar 15;113(1):6-11 [PMID: 15036702]
  10. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Jun;58(6):523-7 [PMID: 15143123]
  11. Ann Fam Med. 2004 May-Jun;2(3):231-9 [PMID: 15209200]
  12. Pediatrics. 2004 Dec;114(6):1560-8 [PMID: 15574615]
  13. JAMA. 1992 Jun 17;267(23):3176-8 [PMID: 1593739]
  14. BJOG. 2005 Sep;112(9):1249-56 [PMID: 16101604]
  15. Am J Community Psychol. 2005 Sep;36(1-2):71-84 [PMID: 16134045]
  16. West J Nurs Res. 2005 Nov;27(7):802-24; discussion 825-30 [PMID: 16275702]
  17. Science. 2005 Nov 25;310(5752):1282-3 [PMID: 16311321]
  18. Nurs Res. 2006 Jan-Feb;55(1):52-61 [PMID: 16439929]
  19. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2006 Mar-Apr;35(2):181-92 [PMID: 16620243]
  20. Bull World Health Organ. 2006 Sep;84(9):739-44 [PMID: 17128344]
  21. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008 Mar;137(1):37-42 [PMID: 17544199]
  22. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2007 Apr;8(2):105-16 [PMID: 17545568]
  23. Womens Health Issues. 2007 Sep-Oct;17(5):290-9 [PMID: 17659882]
  24. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2008 Jan-Feb;37(1):35-41 [PMID: 18226155]
  25. J Interpers Violence. 2008 May;23(5):652-69 [PMID: 18272727]
  26. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jun;51(2):385-97 [PMID: 18463468]
  27. Health Technol Assess. 2009 Mar;13(16):iii-iv, xi-xiii, 1-113, 137-347 [PMID: 19272272]
  28. BMC Public Health. 2009 May 27;9:159 [PMID: 19473534]
  29. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 08;(3):CD005043 [PMID: 19588364]
  30. J Interpers Violence. 2010 May;25(5):929-51 [PMID: 19597160]
  31. JAMA. 2009 Aug 5;302(5):493-501 [PMID: 19654384]
  32. Psychol Med. 2010 Jun;40(6):881-93 [PMID: 19891808]
  33. BMC Public Health. 2010 Jan 02;10:2 [PMID: 20044929]
  34. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010 Jan;164(1):16-23 [PMID: 20048237]
  35. Violence Against Women. 2010 Feb;16(2):189-206 [PMID: 20053947]
  36. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Feb;115(2 Pt 1):273-83 [PMID: 20093899]
  37. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010 Feb;19(2):251-9 [PMID: 20113147]
  38. Soc Sci Med. 2010 Apr;70(7):1011-8 [PMID: 20122774]
  39. J Interpers Violence. 2010 Nov;25(11):2054-76 [PMID: 20145196]
  40. Women Health. 2010 Mar;50(2):125-43 [PMID: 20437301]
  41. Violence Vict. 2010;25(3):319-31 [PMID: 20565004]
  42. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2010 Oct;11(4):190-201 [PMID: 20688785]
  43. Lancet. 2010 Sep 11;376(9744):903-10 [PMID: 20822809]
  44. Public Health Nurs. 2010 Sep-Oct;27(5):385-98 [PMID: 20840708]
  45. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010 Nov;19(11):2017-31 [PMID: 20919921]
  46. Int J Womens Health. 2010 Aug 09;2:183-97 [PMID: 21072311]
  47. Reprod Health Matters. 2010 Nov;18(36):158-70 [PMID: 21111360]
  48. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2011 Feb;14(1):55-65 [PMID: 21153559]
  49. Womens Health Issues. 2011 Mar-Apr;21(2):136-44 [PMID: 21185737]
  50. Soc Sci Med. 2011 Mar;72(6):855-66 [PMID: 21330026]
  51. PLoS One. 2011 Mar 08;6(3):e17591 [PMID: 21408120]
  52. BMC Public Health. 2011 Mar 23;11:178 [PMID: 21429226]
  53. Matern Child Health J. 2012 Jul;16(5):1131-7 [PMID: 21688110]
  54. J Interpers Violence. 2012 Jan;27(1):40-61 [PMID: 21859753]
  55. Matern Child Health J. 2012 Apr;16(3):545-54 [PMID: 21931956]
  56. BMC Fam Pract. 2011 Oct 18;12:113 [PMID: 22008270]
  57. Rev Saude Publica. 2011 Dec;45(6):1044-53 [PMID: 22127653]
  58. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Feb 29;12:50 [PMID: 22375908]
  59. Bull World Health Organ. 2012 Feb 1;90(2):139G-149G [PMID: 22423165]
  60. J Affect Disord. 2012 Sep;140(1):97-101 [PMID: 22542864]
  61. J Interpers Violence. 2012 Oct;27(15):3072-90 [PMID: 22550145]
  62. Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jun 5;156(11):796-808, W-279, W-280, W-281, W-282 [PMID: 22565034]
  63. J Clin Nurs. 2012 Aug;21(15-16):2336-46 [PMID: 22788565]
  64. Am J Prev Med. 2012 Aug;43(2):188-95 [PMID: 22813684]
  65. Am J Public Health. 2012 Oct;102(10):1893-901 [PMID: 22897526]
  66. J Interpers Violence. 2013 Feb;28(3):577-601 [PMID: 22946106]
  67. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2013 Feb;16(1):19-27 [PMID: 23053216]
  68. Fam Process. 2012 Dec;51(4):498-511 [PMID: 23230981]
  69. J Interpers Violence. 2013 May;28(8):1617-41 [PMID: 23295377]
  70. Am J Psychiatry. 2013 Jan;170(1):83-93 [PMID: 23409290]
  71. Violence Vict. 2013;28(1):103-21 [PMID: 23520835]
  72. Basic Appl Soc Psych. 2013 Jan 1;35(1):109-122 [PMID: 23524454]
  73. Lancet. 2013 Jul 20;382(9888):249-58 [PMID: 23598181]
  74. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2013 Jul;27(4):313-22 [PMID: 23772932]
  75. BMC Public Health. 2013 Sep 21;13:866 [PMID: 24053735]
  76. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014 Jan;124(1):6-11 [PMID: 24182684]
  77. PLoS One. 2013 Oct 21;8(10):e78185 [PMID: 24205150]
  78. Psychol Health. 2014;29(4):390-404 [PMID: 24245778]
  79. PLoS One. 2014 Jan 17;9(1):e85084 [PMID: 24482679]
  80. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Aug 28;14:294 [PMID: 25169813]
  81. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 22;(7):CD007007 [PMID: 26200817]
  82. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Nov 11;15:278 [PMID: 26554901]
  83. JAMA. 1996 Jun 26;275(24):1915-20 [PMID: 8648873]
  84. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl. 1997;165:19-29 [PMID: 9219452]

MeSH Term

Adult
Belgium
Female
Help-Seeking Behavior
Humans
Intimate Partner Violence
Postpartum Period
Pregnancy
Prenatal Care
Prevalence
Prospective Studies
Referral and Consultation
Single-Blind Method

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0IPVcardviolencehealthbehaviourreferralinterventionpsychosocialsafetypartnertrialvictimisationIG001impactwomenintimateprevalencehelp-seekingpregnancy2010randomizedcontrolledquestionnaireParticipantsInterventionGroupparticipantsreceivedCGinterview31significantlyP < 0soughthelpperceivedhelpfultypesBACKGROUND:aimedinvestigatereferral-basedprospectivecohortdisclosingassociatedoutcomesMETHODS:WomenseekingantenatalcareelevenBelgianhospitalsconsecutivelyinvitedJuneOctober2012participatesingle-blindRCThandedwillinginterviewedreportingrandomisedcontactdetailsservicesprovidingassistancetipsincreaseControl"thankyou"Follow-updataobtainedtelephoneaverage10 monthsreceiptRESULTS:follow-upn = 189667%n = 126reportedstudy-perioddecreased4%P<0increased54/140238%n = 46/193formal705%n = 136/193informal3%n = 60/192tookleastonemeasureobservedstatisticallysignificantdifferenceshoweverAdjustedbaselinehelpfulnessseemedlargerCONCLUSIONS:AskingquestionscanevenlowseverityalthoughsimplydistributingmayqualifyidealFutureinterventionsmultifaceteddelineatedifferentcontrollingmeasurementreactivitydesigningtailoredprogrammeadjustedspecificneedscouplesexperiencingTRIALREGISTRATION:registeredUSNationalInstitutesHealthClinicalTrialsgovregistryJuly6identifierNCT01158690card-basedpostpartum:Help-seekingIntimatePregnancyPsychosocialSafety

Similar Articles

Cited By