The epidemiology and transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the community in Singapore: study protocol for a longitudinal household study.

Nivedita Shankar, Angela Li Ping Chow, Jolene Oon, Li Yang Hsu, Brenda Ang, Junxiong Pang, Paola Florez De Sessions, Balamurugan Periaswamy, Paul A Tambyah, Desmond B Teo, Clarence C Tam
Author Information
  1. Nivedita Shankar: Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, Tahir Foundation Building, 12 Science Drive 2, 11-01, Singapore, 117549, Singapore. ephns@nus.edu.sg. ORCID
  2. Angela Li Ping Chow: Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
  3. Jolene Oon: National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
  4. Li Yang Hsu: Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, Tahir Foundation Building, 12 Science Drive 2, 11-01, Singapore, 117549, Singapore.
  5. Brenda Ang: Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
  6. Junxiong Pang: Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, Tahir Foundation Building, 12 Science Drive 2, 11-01, Singapore, 117549, Singapore.
  7. Paola Florez De Sessions: Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
  8. Balamurugan Periaswamy: Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
  9. Paul A Tambyah: National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
  10. Desmond B Teo: National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
  11. Clarence C Tam: Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, Tahir Foundation Building, 12 Science Drive 2, 11-01, Singapore, 117549, Singapore.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is one of the most common multidrug-resistant organisms in healthcare settings worldwide, but little is known about MRSA transmission outside of acute healthcare settings especially in Asia. We describe the methods for a prospective longitudinal study of MRSA prevalence and transmission.
METHODS: MRSA-colonized individuals were identified from MRSA admission screening at two tertiary hospitals and recruited together with their household contacts. Participants submitted self-collected nasal, axilla and groin (NAG) swabs by mail for MRSA culture at baseline and monthly thereafter for 6 months. A comparison group of households of MRSA-negative patients provided swab samples at one time point. In a validation sub-study, separate swabs from each site were collected from randomly selected individuals, to compare MRSA detection rates between swab sites, and between samples collected by participants versus those collected by trained research staff. Information on each participant's demographic information, medical status and medical history, past healthcare facilities usage and contacts, and personal interactions with others were collected using a self-administered questionnaire.
DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Understanding the dynamics of MRSA persistence and transmission in the community is crucial to devising and evaluating successful MRSA control strategies. Close contact with MRSA colonized patients may to be important for MRSA persistence in the community; evidence from this study on the extent of community MRSA could inform the development of household- or community-based interventions to reduce MRSA colonization of close contacts and subsequent re-introduction of MRSA into healthcare settings. Analysis of longitudinal data using whole-genome sequencing will yield further information regarding MRSA transmission within households, with significant implications for MRSA infection control outside acute hospital settings.

Keywords

References

  1. J Med Microbiol. 2007 Mar;56(Pt 3):376-379 [PMID: 17314369]
  2. J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Jan;48(1):202-7 [PMID: 19923490]
  3. Genome Med. 2011 Aug 23;3(8):53 [PMID: 21861847]
  4. Ann Emerg Med. 2005 Mar;45(3):311-20 [PMID: 15726056]
  5. Singapore Med J. 2006 Jan;47(1):20-6 [PMID: 16397716]
  6. J Hosp Infect. 2013 Oct;85(2):141-8 [PMID: 24011440]
  7. J Lab Clin Med. 1999 Jun;133(6):525-34 [PMID: 10360626]
  8. Scand J Infect Dis. 2000;32(6):587-95 [PMID: 11200366]
  9. J Infect Dis. 2008 May 1;197(9):1226-34 [PMID: 18422434]
  10. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2008 Oct;37(10):891-6 [PMID: 19037524]
  11. Genome Biol. 2011 Oct 24;12(10):230 [PMID: 22027015]
  12. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013 Sep;19(9):784-9 [PMID: 23331482]
  13. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007 Jul;28(7):853-9 [PMID: 17564989]
  14. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017 Jan;38(1):61-67 [PMID: 27821194]
  15. mBio. 2015 Mar 10;6(2):e00054 [PMID: 25759497]
  16. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35002 [PMID: 22558106]
  17. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2011 Nov;30(11):927-32 [PMID: 21617572]
  18. BMC Infect Dis. 2012 Feb 20;12:45 [PMID: 22348549]
  19. Clin Infect Dis. 2017 May 15;64(suppl_2):S76-S81 [PMID: 28475785]
  20. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011 Nov;32(11):1073-8 [PMID: 22011533]
  21. Genome Res. 2015 Jan;25(1):111-8 [PMID: 25491771]
  22. PLoS One. 2016 Mar 07;11(3):e0149844 [PMID: 26950298]
  23. Epidemiol Infect. 2015 Jan;143(2):354-65 [PMID: 24763185]
  24. Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Jan 1;62(1):37-44 [PMID: 26347509]
  25. Arch Intern Med. 2009 Aug 10;169(15):1372-8 [PMID: 19667299]
  26. BMJ Open. 2012 Jun 06;2(3): [PMID: 22674929]
  27. J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Apr;53(4):1072-9 [PMID: 25631811]
  28. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2009 Jul;10(6):414-8 [PMID: 19560719]
  29. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Jul;37(7):761-7 [PMID: 27052880]
  30. Epidemiol Infect. 2010 May;138(5):683-5 [PMID: 20109256]
  31. Med Care. 2013 Mar;51(3):205-15 [PMID: 23358388]
  32. Genome Med. 2016 Oct 3;8(1):102 [PMID: 27716432]
  33. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007 Dec;13(12):1944-7 [PMID: 18258055]
  34. Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Oct 1;39(7):971-9 [PMID: 15472848]
  35. J Med Microbiol. 2013 Mar;62(Pt 3):437-440 [PMID: 23222858]
  36. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2007 Nov;26(11):1066-8 [PMID: 17984820]
  37. J Infect Dis. 2004 May 1;189(9):1565-73 [PMID: 15116291]
  38. Genome Biol. 2015 Apr 23;16:81 [PMID: 25903077]
  39. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997 Jul;10(3):505-20 [PMID: 9227864]
  40. Scand J Infect Dis. 2007;39(9):764-8 [PMID: 17701713]
  41. Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Mar;58(5):609-18 [PMID: 24336829]
  42. J Hosp Infect. 2001 Feb;47(2):104-9 [PMID: 11170773]
  43. Science. 2010 Jan 22;327(5964):469-74 [PMID: 20093474]
  44. Infect Control. 1984 Jul;5(7):326-31 [PMID: 6376403]
  45. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 May 6;111(18):6738-43 [PMID: 24753569]

MeSH Term

Adult
Community-Acquired Infections
Family Characteristics
Health Facilities
Humans
Longitudinal Studies
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Nose
Prevalence
Prospective Studies
Singapore
Staphylococcal Infections
Surveys and Questionnaires
Tertiary Care Centers

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0MRSAtransmissionhealthcaresettingsstudycollectedcommunityStaphylococcusaureuslongitudinalcontactsoneoutsideacuteindividualshouseholdswabshouseholdspatientsswabsamplesinformationmedicalusingpersistencecontrolepidemiologystudiesBACKGROUND/AIM:Methicillin-resistantcommonmultidrug-resistantorganismsworldwidelittleknownespeciallyAsiadescribemethodsprospectiveprevalenceMETHODS:MRSA-colonizedidentifiedadmissionscreeningtwotertiaryhospitalsrecruitedtogetherParticipantssubmittedself-collectednasalaxillagroinNAGmailculturebaselinemonthlythereafter6 monthscomparisongroupMRSA-negativeprovidedtimepointvalidationsub-studyseparatesiterandomlyselectedcomparedetectionratessitesparticipantsversustrainedresearchstaffInformationparticipant'sdemographicstatushistorypastfacilitiesusagepersonalinteractionsothersself-administeredquestionnaireDISCUSSION/CONCLUSION:UnderstandingdynamicscrucialdevisingevaluatingsuccessfulstrategiesClosecontactcolonizedmayimportantevidenceextentinformdevelopmenthousehold-community-basedinterventionsreducecolonizationclosesubsequentre-introductionAnalysisdatawhole-genomesequencingwillyieldregardingwithinsignificantimplicationsinfectionhospitalmethicillin-resistantSingapore:protocolAntimicrobialresistanceCohortColonizationCommunityHouseholdLongitudinalMethicillin

Similar Articles

Cited By