Spontaneous Emergence of Legibility in Writing Systems: The Case of Orientation Anisotropy.

Olivier Morin
Author Information
  1. Olivier Morin: Minds and Tradition Research Group, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History.

Abstract

Cultural forms are constrained by cognitive biases, and writing is thought to have evolved to fit basic visual preferences, but little is known about the history and mechanisms of that evolution. Cognitive constraints have been documented for the topology of script features, but not for their orientation. Orientation anisotropy in human vision, as revealed by the oblique effect, suggests that cardinal (vertical and horizontal) orientations, being easier to process, should be overrepresented in letters. As this study of 116 scripts shows, the orientation of strokes inside written characters massively favors cardinal directions, and it is organized in such a way as to make letter recognition easier: Cardinal and oblique strokes tend not to mix, and mirror symmetry is anisotropic, favoring vertical over horizontal symmetry. Phylogenetic analyses and recently invented scripts show that cultural evolution over the last three millennia cannot be the sole cause of these effects.

Keywords

References

  1. Perception. 2000;29(8):981-7 [PMID: 11145089]
  2. Dev Neuropsychol. 2006;29(1):43-60 [PMID: 16390288]
  3. Neuroimage. 2011 Mar 15;55(2):742-9 [PMID: 21111052]
  4. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Aug 27;364(1528):2405-15 [PMID: 19620111]
  5. Psychol Bull. 1972 Oct;78(4):266-78 [PMID: 4562947]
  6. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Apr 19;113(16):4530-5 [PMID: 27044094]
  7. Hum Mov Sci. 2008 Apr;27(2):242-55 [PMID: 18407363]
  8. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Oct;138(2):322-8 [PMID: 21855049]
  9. Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Feb 7;272(1560):267-75 [PMID: 15705551]
  10. Science. 1975 Nov 28;190(4217):900-2 [PMID: 1188370]
  11. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Aug;42(8):1186-203 [PMID: 26913778]
  12. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1976 Aug;2(3):429-34 [PMID: 993747]
  13. Neuron. 2007 Oct 25;56(2):384-98 [PMID: 17964253]
  14. Perception. 1994;23(2):221-36 [PMID: 7971101]
  15. J Exp Child Psychol. 2000 Jun;76(2):123-50 [PMID: 10788306]
  16. J Exp Psychol. 1965 Oct;70(4):401-6 [PMID: 5826028]
  17. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1992 Feb;18(1):34-49 [PMID: 1532193]
  18. Aust Occup Ther J. 2011 Oct;58(5):321-8 [PMID: 21957916]
  19. Vision Res. 1995 Mar;35(6):733-8 [PMID: 7740765]
  20. Nature. 2013 Nov 21;503(7476):389-91 [PMID: 24226775]
  21. J Neurophysiol. 2000 Feb;83(2):941-54 [PMID: 10669506]
  22. Am Nat. 2006 May;167(5):E117-39 [PMID: 16671005]
  23. Work. 1998;11(3):307-13 [PMID: 24441601]
  24. Vision Res. 2006 Dec;46(28):4646-74 [PMID: 16808957]
  25. Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Jan;8(1):40-6 [PMID: 14697402]
  26. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Sep;141(1):122-32 [PMID: 22889674]
  27. PLoS One. 2010 Jan 20;5(1):e8559 [PMID: 20098492]
  28. Perception. 1982;11(2):163-71 [PMID: 7155769]
  29. Nat Neurosci. 2011 Jun 05;14(7):926-32 [PMID: 21642976]
  30. Psychol Sci. 2008 Nov;19(11):1161-8 [PMID: 19076489]

MeSH Term

Anisotropy
Humans
Visual Perception
Writing

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0evolutionOrientationCulturalorientationanisotropyobliqueeffectcardinalverticalhorizontalscriptsstrokessymmetryformsconstrainedcognitivebiaseswritingthoughtevolvedfitbasicvisualpreferenceslittleknownhistorymechanismsCognitiveconstraintsdocumentedtopologyscriptfeatureshumanvisionrevealedsuggestsorientationseasierprocessoverrepresentedlettersstudy116showsinsidewrittencharactersmassivelyfavorsdirectionsorganizedwaymakeletterrecognitioneasier:CardinaltendmixmirroranisotropicfavoringPhylogeneticanalysesrecentlyinventedshowculturallastthreemillenniasolecauseeffectsSpontaneousEmergenceLegibilityWritingSystems:CaseAnisotropyNeuralrecyclingObliqueSymmetry

Similar Articles

Cited By