Co-founding ant queens prevent disease by performing prophylactic undertaking behaviour.

Christopher D Pull, Sylvia Cremer
Author Information
  1. Christopher D Pull: IST Austria (Institute of Science and Technology Austria), Am Campus 1, 3400, Klosterneuburg, Austria. chris.pull@rhul.ac.uk. ORCID
  2. Sylvia Cremer: IST Austria (Institute of Science and Technology Austria), Am Campus 1, 3400, Klosterneuburg, Austria.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Social insects form densely crowded societies in environments with high pathogen loads, but have evolved collective defences that mitigate the impact of disease. However, colony-founding queens lack this protection and suffer high rates of mortality. The impact of pathogens may be exacerbated in species where queens found colonies together, as healthy individuals may contract pathogens from infectious co-founders. Therefore, we tested whether ant queens avoid founding colonies with pathogen-exposed conspecifics and how they might limit disease transmission from infectious individuals.
RESULTS: Using Lasius niger queens and a naturally infecting fungal pathogen Metarhizium brunneum, we observed that queens were equally likely to found colonies with another pathogen-exposed or sham-treated queen. However, when one queen died, the surviving individual performed biting, burial and removal of the corpse. These undertaking behaviours were performed prophylactically, i.e. targeted equally towards non-infected and infected corpses, as well as carried out before infected corpses became infectious. Biting and burial reduced the risk of the queens contracting and dying from disease from an infectious corpse of a dead co-foundress.
CONCLUSIONS: We show that co-founding ant queens express undertaking behaviours that, in mature colonies, are performed exclusively by workers. Such infection avoidance behaviours act before the queens can contract the disease and will therefore improve the overall chance of colony founding success in ant queens.

Keywords

References

  1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Aug 3;96(16):9165-8 [PMID: 10430913]
  2. Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Dec;14(12):477-482 [PMID: 10542454]
  3. Science. 2000 Nov 10;290(5494):1166-8 [PMID: 11073456]
  4. Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Sep 7;269(1502):1811-9 [PMID: 12350269]
  5. Brain Behav Evol. 2002;60(3):152-64 [PMID: 12417820]
  6. BMC Evol Biol. 2004 Nov 14;4:45 [PMID: 15541185]
  7. Naturwissenschaften. 2005 Jun;92(6):300-4 [PMID: 15864512]
  8. Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Sep 7;272(1574):1803-8 [PMID: 16096092]
  9. Nature. 2006 Jun 15;441(7095):872-5 [PMID: 16778889]
  10. Curr Biol. 2007 Aug 21;17(16):R693-702 [PMID: 17714663]
  11. J Evol Biol. 2009 Mar;22(3):564-70 [PMID: 19170815]
  12. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Feb 12;366(1563):389-401 [PMID: 21199843]
  13. Environ Entomol. 2011 Dec;40(6):1554-65 [PMID: 22217773]
  14. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e34484 [PMID: 22470575]
  15. PLoS Biol. 2012;10(4):e1001300 [PMID: 22509134]
  16. Naturwissenschaften. 2012 Nov;99(11):949-58 [PMID: 23086391]
  17. Int J Biol Sci. 2013;9(3):313-21 [PMID: 23569436]
  18. Sci Rep. 2013;3:1650 [PMID: 23598990]
  19. Naturwissenschaften. 2013 Dec;100(12):1125-36 [PMID: 24233126]
  20. J Chem Ecol. 2013 Dec;39(11-12):1424-32 [PMID: 24242873]
  21. Psychol Sci. 2014 Mar;25(3):817-23 [PMID: 24452606]
  22. Ecol Evol. 2014 May;4(10):1761-7 [PMID: 24963375]
  23. Biol Lett. 2014 Jul;10(7):null [PMID: 25009241]
  24. Trends Immunol. 2014 Oct;35(10):457-64 [PMID: 25256957]
  25. PLoS One. 2014 Nov 05;9(11):e111961 [PMID: 25372856]
  26. Ecol Evol. 2014 Nov;4(22):4209-19 [PMID: 25540683]
  27. Bull Entomol Res. 2015 Oct;105(5):607-14 [PMID: 26082426]
  28. Sci Rep. 2015 Oct 13;5:15106 [PMID: 26458743]
  29. PLoS One. 2016 Aug 16;11(8):e0160820 [PMID: 27529548]
  30. Sci Adv. 2017 Apr 07;3(4):e1601721 [PMID: 28435875]
  31. Elife. 2018 Jan 09;7: [PMID: 29310753]
  32. Proc Biol Sci. 1995 Jul 22;261(1360):31-5 [PMID: 7644547]

MeSH Term

Animals
Ants
Behavior, Animal
Metarhizium
Nesting Behavior
Social Behavior

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0queensdiseasecoloniesinfectiousantperformedundertakingbehavioursSocialhighpathogenimpactHoweverpathogensmayfoundindividualscontractfoundingpathogen-exposedequallyqueenburialcorpseinfectedcorpsesbehaviourBACKGROUND:insectsformdenselycrowdedsocietiesenvironmentsloadsevolvedcollectivedefencesmitigatecolony-foundinglackprotectionsufferratesmortalityexacerbatedspeciestogetherhealthyco-foundersThereforetestedwhetheravoidconspecificsmightlimittransmissionRESULTS:UsingLasiusnigernaturallyinfectingfungalMetarhiziumbrunneumobservedlikelyanothersham-treatedonediedsurvivingindividualbitingremovalprophylacticallyietargetedtowardsnon-infectedwellcarriedbecameBitingreducedriskcontractingdyingdeadco-foundressCONCLUSIONS:showco-foundingexpressmatureexclusivelyworkersinfectionavoidanceactcanwillthereforeimproveoverallchancecolonysuccessCo-foundingpreventperformingprophylacticDiseasedefenceEntomopathogenicfungusHost-pathogeninteractionsPleometrosisimmunity

Similar Articles

Cited By