Distinguishing among potential mechanisms of singleton suppression.

Nicholas Gaspelin, Steven J Luck
Author Information
  1. Nicholas Gaspelin: Center for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis.
  2. Steven J Luck: Center for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis.

Abstract

Previous research has revealed that people can suppress salient stimuli that might otherwise capture visual attention. The present study tests between 3 possible mechanisms of visual suppression. According to , items are suppressed on the basis of simple feature values. According to , items are suppressed on the basis of local discontinuities within a given feature dimension. According to , items are suppressed on the basis of their dimension-independent salience levels. The current study distinguished among these models by varying the predictability of the singleton color value. If items are suppressed by virtue of salience alone, then it should not matter whether the singleton color is predictable. However, evidence from probe processing and eye movements indicated that suppression is possible only when the color values are predictable. Moreover, the ability to suppress salient items developed gradually as participants gained experience with the feature that defined the salient distractor. These results are consistent with first-order feature suppression models, and are inconsistent with the other models of suppression. In other words, people primarily suppress salient distractors on the basis of their simple features and not on the basis of salience per se. (PsycINFO Database Record

References

  1. Neuron. 2007 Feb 15;53(4):605-17 [PMID: 17296560]
  2. Percept Psychophys. 2002 Jul;64(5):741-53 [PMID: 12201333]
  3. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Aug;37(4):1007-16 [PMID: 21553995]
  4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Aug 3;107(31):13878-82 [PMID: 20643918]
  5. Hum Neurobiol. 1985;4(4):219-27 [PMID: 3836989]
  6. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Jun;34(3):509-30 [PMID: 18505320]
  7. Spat Vis. 1989;4(2-3):103-29 [PMID: 2487159]
  8. Psychol Rev. 1989 Jul;96(3):433-58 [PMID: 2756067]
  9. Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Apr;22(2):461-8 [PMID: 25134471]
  10. Percept Psychophys. 1994 May;55(5):485-96 [PMID: 8008550]
  11. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 Mar;2(3):194-203 [PMID: 11256080]
  12. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Apr;86(8):2985-9 [PMID: 16594030]
  13. J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Apr;21(4):760-75 [PMID: 18564048]
  14. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1984 Oct;10(5):601-21 [PMID: 6238122]
  15. Percept Psychophys. 1996 Jan;58(1):88-101 [PMID: 8668524]
  16. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Dec;39(6):1713-30 [PMID: 23527999]
  17. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1992 Nov;18(4):1030-44 [PMID: 1431742]
  18. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Aug;33(4):764-87 [PMID: 17683227]
  19. Front Psychol. 2013 Oct 02;4:697 [PMID: 24106485]
  20. Cogn Psychol. 1997 Jun;33(1):64-87 [PMID: 9212722]
  21. Psychophysiology. 1994 May;31(3):291-308 [PMID: 8008793]
  22. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Aug;41(4):1153-65 [PMID: 26030438]
  23. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Feb;29(1):121-38 [PMID: 12669752]
  24. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Aug;42(8):1104-20 [PMID: 26854530]
  25. Sci Am. 1975 Apr;232(4):34-43 [PMID: 1114309]
  26. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1990 Aug;16(3):459-78 [PMID: 2144564]
  27. Percept Psychophys. 1988 Apr;43(4):307-18 [PMID: 3362658]
  28. J Am Stat Assoc. 1990 Sep;85(411):609-16 [PMID: 12155387]
  29. Cereb Cortex. 2007 Sep;17 Suppl 1:i118-24 [PMID: 17725994]
  30. Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Jun;1(2):202-38 [PMID: 24203471]
  31. Vision Res. 2010 Oct 12;50(21):2116-26 [PMID: 20691720]
  32. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Jan;79(1):45-62 [PMID: 27804032]
  33. Mem Cognit. 1994 Nov;22(6):657-72 [PMID: 7808275]
  34. Percept Psychophys. 1995 Jan;57(1):1-17 [PMID: 7885801]
  35. Psychol Rev. 1997 Jan;104(1):90-122 [PMID: 9009881]
  36. Psychophysiology. 2011 Dec;48(12):1711-25 [PMID: 21895683]
  37. J Neurosci Methods. 2007 Aug 15;164(1):177-90 [PMID: 17517438]
  38. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1985 Feb;11(1):1-13 [PMID: 3156955]
  39. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Aug;72(6):1455-70 [PMID: 20675793]
  40. Nature. 1999 Aug 26;400(6747):867-9 [PMID: 10476964]
  41. Nat Neurosci. 2006 Aug;9(8):1071-6 [PMID: 16819520]
  42. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1989 Aug;15(3):419-33 [PMID: 2527952]
  43. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Jun;38(3):580-4 [PMID: 22468723]
  44. Percept Psychophys. 1992 Jun;51(6):599-606 [PMID: 1620571]
  45. Science. 2005 Apr 22;308(5721):529-34 [PMID: 15845848]
  46. J Neurosci. 2014 Apr 16;34(16):5658-66 [PMID: 24741056]
  47. Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Oct;19(5):871-8 [PMID: 22696250]
  48. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Oct 25;113(43):E6712-E6720 [PMID: 27791040]
  49. Vis cogn. 2011 Aug;19(7):956-972 [PMID: 22053147]
  50. J Vis. 2011 Nov 10;11(13): [PMID: 22076486]
  51. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Jun;24(3):847-58 [PMID: 9627420]
  52. Cogn Psychol. 1980 Jan;12(1):97-136 [PMID: 7351125]
  53. Percept Psychophys. 2003 Oct;65(7):999-1010 [PMID: 14674628]
  54. J Neurosci. 2009 Sep 23;29(38):11933-42 [PMID: 19776279]
  55. Front Psychol. 2013 Nov 26;4:863 [PMID: 24324449]
  56. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Oct;135(2):103-5; discussion 133-9 [PMID: 20510849]
  57. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Oct;135(2):77-99 [PMID: 20507828]
  58. Nature. 1998 Jan 29;391(6666):481-4 [PMID: 9461214]
  59. Psychol Sci. 2015 Nov;26(11):1740-50 [PMID: 26420441]
  60. Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Apr;16(2):225-37 [PMID: 19293088]
  61. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Oct;29(5):1021-35 [PMID: 14585020]
  62. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Feb;36(1):1-16 [PMID: 20121291]
  63. J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Aug;20(8):1423-33 [PMID: 18303979]
  64. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1984 Feb;10(1):32-9 [PMID: 6242762]
  65. Psychol Sci. 2016 Apr;27(4):476-85 [PMID: 26893292]
  66. Percept Psychophys. 1988 Apr;43(4):346-54 [PMID: 3362663]

Grants

  1. F32 EY024834/NEI NIH HHS
  2. R01 MH065034/NIMH NIH HHS
  3. R01 MH076226/NIMH NIH HHS
  4. /NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Attention
Color Perception
Eye Movements
Female
Humans
Male
Psychomotor Performance
Visual Perception
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0suppressionitemsbasissalientsuppressedfeaturesuppressAccordingsaliencemodelssingletoncolorpeoplevisualstudypossiblemechanismssimplevaluesamongpredictablePreviousresearchrevealedcanstimulimightotherwisecaptureattentionpresenttests3localdiscontinuitieswithingivendimensiondimension-independentlevelscurrentdistinguishedvaryingpredictabilityvaluevirtuealonematterwhetherHoweverevidenceprobeprocessingeyemovementsindicatedMoreoverabilitydevelopedgraduallyparticipantsgainedexperiencedefineddistractorresultsconsistentfirst-orderinconsistentwordsprimarilydistractorsfeaturespersePsycINFODatabaseRecordDistinguishingpotential

Similar Articles

Cited By (77)