Cross-commodity delay discounting of alcohol and money in alcohol users.

Lara N Moody, Allison N Tegge, Warren K Bickel
Author Information
  1. Lara N Moody: Addiction Recovery Research Center, Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Roanoke, VA, USA.
  2. Allison N Tegge: Addiction Recovery Research Center, Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Roanoke, VA, USA.
  3. Warren K Bickel: Addiction Recovery Research Center, Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Roanoke, VA, USA.

Abstract

Despite real-world implications, the pattern of delay discounting in alcohol users when the commodities now and later differ has not been well characterized. In this study, 60 participants on Amazon's Mechanical Turk completed the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) to assess severity of use and completed four delay discounting tasks between hypothetical, equivalent amounts of alcohol and money available at five delays. The tasks included two cross-commodity (alcohol now-money later and money now-alcohol later) and two same-commodity (money now-money later and alcohol now-alcohol later) conditions. Delay discounting was significantly associated with clinical cutoffs of the AUDIT for both of the cross-commodity conditions but not for either of the same-commodity delay discounting tasks. The cross-commodity discounting conditions were related to severity of use wherein heavy users discounted future alcohol less and future money more. The change in direction of the discounting effect was dependent on the commodity that was distally available suggesting a distinctive pattern of discounting across commodities when comparing light and heavy alcohol users.

Keywords

References

  1. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007 Apr;15(2):187-94 [PMID: 17469942]
  2. J Exp Anal Behav. 2016 Jul;106(1):1-21 [PMID: 27353633]
  3. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2009 Aug;205(2):305-18 [PMID: 19390842]
  4. J Gen Psychol. 2010 Jul-Sep;137(3):273-86 [PMID: 20718227]
  5. Nicotine Tob Res. 2004 Oct;6(5):819-28 [PMID: 15700917]
  6. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2001 Mar;154(3):243-50 [PMID: 11351931]
  7. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2010 Feb;18(1):99-107 [PMID: 20158299]
  8. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2014;10:641-77 [PMID: 24679180]
  9. J Exp Anal Behav. 2016 Sep;106(2):145-55 [PMID: 27566660]
  10. J Addict. 2014;2014:189853 [PMID: 25197609]
  11. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2011 Aug;216(3):305-21 [PMID: 21373791]
  12. Addiction. 1993 Jun;88(6):791-804 [PMID: 8329970]
  13. Behav Processes. 2003 Oct 31;64(3):345-354 [PMID: 14580703]
  14. J Caffeine Res. 2016 Mar 1;6(1):10-19 [PMID: 26989563]
  15. Am J Prev Med. 2015 Nov;49(5):e73-e79 [PMID: 26477807]
  16. Prev Chronic Dis. 2014 Jun 26;11:E109 [PMID: 24967831]
  17. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2011 Sep;217(2):177-87 [PMID: 21487658]
  18. J Exp Anal Behav. 2017 Jan;107(1):151-160 [PMID: 28101922]
  19. J Exp Anal Behav. 2015 Jan;103(1):87-107 [PMID: 25388973]
  20. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2016 Apr;40(4):672-85 [PMID: 26993151]
  21. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2016 Feb;24(1):30-7 [PMID: 26691847]
  22. MMWR Suppl. 2014 Oct 31;63(4):3-27 [PMID: 25356673]
  23. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1999 Mar;128(1):78-87 [PMID: 10100392]
  24. J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 Sep;76(2):235-43 [PMID: 11599641]
  25. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 Jun;16(3):264-74 [PMID: 18540786]
  26. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Mar 1;160:190-6 [PMID: 26846198]
  27. AIDS Behav. 2015 Sep;19(9):1655-65 [PMID: 26066395]
  28. Appetite. 2014 Apr;75:82-9 [PMID: 24380883]

Grants

  1. F31 AA024368/NIAAA NIH HHS
  2. R01 AA021529/NIAAA NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0discountingalcohollatermoneydelayuserscross-commodityusetasksconditionspatterncommoditiescompletedAUDITseverityavailabletwonow-moneynow-alcoholsame-commodityDelayheavyfutureDespitereal-worldimplicationsnowdifferwellcharacterizedstudy60participantsAmazon'sMechanicalTurkAlcoholUseDisorderIdentificationTestassessfourhypotheticalequivalentamountsfivedelaysincludedsignificantlyassociatedclinicalcutoffseitherrelatedwhereindiscountedlesschangedirectioneffectdependentcommoditydistallysuggestingdistinctiveacrosscomparinglightCross-commoditycompetingneurobehavioraldecisionsystem

Similar Articles

Cited By