Disentangling the Relations between Social Identity and Prosocial and Antisocial Behavior in Competitive Youth Sport.

Mark W Bruner, Ian D Boardley, Alex J Benson, Kathleen S Wilson, Zachary Root, Jennifer Turnnidge, Jordan Sutcliffe, Jean Côté
Author Information
  1. Mark W Bruner: School of Physical and Health Education, Nipissing University, North Bay, Canada. markb@nipissingu.ca.
  2. Ian D Boardley: School of Sport, Exercise, and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
  3. Alex J Benson: Department of Psychology, Western University, London, Canada.
  4. Kathleen S Wilson: Department of Kinesiology, California State University, Fullerton, USA.
  5. Zachary Root: Faculty of Applied Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, Canada.
  6. Jennifer Turnnidge: School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
  7. Jordan Sutcliffe: School of Physical and Health Education, Nipissing University, North Bay, Canada.
  8. Jean Côté: School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.

Abstract

The social identities formed through membership on extracurricular activity groups may contribute to the frequency with which youth engage in prosocial and antisocial behavior. However, researchers have yet to disentangle the individual- and group-level processes social identification effects operate through; sex and perceived norms may also moderate such effects. Thus, we investigated the hierarchical and conditional relations between three dimensions of social identity (i.e., ingroup ties, cognitive centrality, ingroup affect) and prosocial and antisocial behavior in youth ice hockey players (N = 376; 33% female). Multilevel analyses demonstrated antisocial teammate and opponent behavior were predicted by cognitive centrality at the team level. Further, prosocial teammate behavior was predicted by cognitive centrality and ingroup ties at the individual-level. Also, perceived norms for prosocial teammate behavior moderated the relations between ingroup ties, cognitive centrality, and ingroup affect and prosocial teammate behaviour. Finally, sex moderated the relations between cognitive centrality/ingroup affect and antisocial opponent behavior. This work demonstrates the multilevel and conditional nature of how social identity dimensions relate to youth prosocial and antisocial behavior.

Keywords

References

  1. Soc Sci Med. 2005 Mar;60(6):1165-73 [PMID: 15626514]
  2. Br J Soc Psychol. 1999 Sep;38 ( Pt 3):225-44 [PMID: 10520477]
  3. Psychol Sci. 2001 Sep;12(5):397-402 [PMID: 11554673]
  4. J Res Adolesc. 2005;15(3):235-260 [PMID: 20592955]
  5. Child Dev. 2013 Mar-Apr;84(2):397-412 [PMID: 23005580]
  6. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2007 Apr;29(2):190-207 [PMID: 17568066]
  7. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2007 Dec;29(6):747-62 [PMID: 18089902]
  8. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 1999;3(3):193-209 [PMID: 15661671]
  9. Cogn Emot. 2016;30(1):3-19 [PMID: 26391957]
  10. Child Dev. 2008 Sep-Oct;79(5):1185-229 [PMID: 18826521]
  11. Sports Med. 2015 Aug;45(8):1083-96 [PMID: 26092187]
  12. Sci Am. 1970 Nov;223(5):96-102 [PMID: 5482577]
  13. Am Psychol. 2009 Nov;64(8):644-58 [PMID: 19899859]
  14. J Exp Child Psychol. 2013 Sep;116(1):19-36 [PMID: 23422928]
  15. Child Dev. 2018 Jan;89(1):248-263 [PMID: 28105643]
  16. Psychol Bull. 1993 Sep;114(2):376-90 [PMID: 8416037]
  17. J Sports Sci. 2006 May;24(5):455-66 [PMID: 16608760]
  18. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2010 Apr;32(2):176-92 [PMID: 20479477]
  19. Polit Psychol. 2013 Oct 1;34(5):null [PMID: 24187409]
  20. Psychol Bull. 1995 May;117(3):497-529 [PMID: 7777651]
  21. Addict Behav. 2007 Aug;32(8):1602-27 [PMID: 17188815]
  22. J Adolesc. 2014 Jun;37(4):359-66 [PMID: 24793382]
  23. J Sports Sci. 2009 Jun;27(8):843-54 [PMID: 19449250]
  24. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Jan;2(1):55-69 [PMID: 22682728]
  25. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2016 May;28(2):296-303 [PMID: 26376020]
  26. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Jan;52(1):47-55 [PMID: 3820077]
  27. Dev Psychol. 2006 Jul;42(4):698-713 [PMID: 16802902]
  28. J Genet Psychol. 2007 Jun;168(2):147-76 [PMID: 17936970]
  29. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2017 Jun;88(2):209-214 [PMID: 28362163]
  30. J Youth Adolesc. 2013 May;42(5):711-22 [PMID: 23296318]
  31. J Res Adolesc. 2011 Mar 1;21(1):166-179 [PMID: 23730122]
  32. Psychol Bull. 1986 Nov;100(3):309-30 [PMID: 3797558]
  33. J Sports Sci. 2017 Oct;35(20):1963-1974 [PMID: 27735231]
  34. J Appl Psychol. 2007 Jul;92(4):952-66 [PMID: 17638457]
  35. Annu Rev Psychol. 2005;56:365-92 [PMID: 15709940]
  36. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2009 Feb;31(1):97-117 [PMID: 19325190]
  37. Psychol Methods. 2007 Jun;12(2):121-38 [PMID: 17563168]
  38. J Adolesc. 2011 Jun;34(3):555-67 [PMID: 20547418]

Grants

  1. 435-2016-0591/SSHRC
  2. 435-2014-0038/SSHRC

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Competitive Behavior
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Hockey
Humans
Male
Peer Group
Problem Behavior
Sex Factors
Social Behavior
Social Identification
Youth Sports

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0behaviorprosocialantisocialingroupcognitivesocialcentralityteammateyouthrelationstiesaffectactivitymayidentificationeffectssexperceivednormsconditionaldimensionsidentityopponentpredictedmoderatedidentitiesformedmembershipextracurriculargroupscontributefrequencyengageHoweverresearchersyetdisentangleindividual-group-levelprocessesoperatealsomoderateThusinvestigatedhierarchicalthreeieicehockeyplayersN = 37633%femaleMultilevelanalysesdemonstratedteamlevelindividual-levelAlsobehaviourFinallycentrality/ingroupworkdemonstratesmultilevelnaturerelateDisentanglingRelationsSocialIdentityProsocialAntisocialBehaviorCompetitiveYouthSportGroupdynamicsPersonaldevelopmentPhysicalTeam

Similar Articles

Cited By