Income inequality and subjective well-being: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kayonda Hubert Ngamaba, Maria Panagioti, Christopher J Armitage
Author Information
  1. Kayonda Hubert Ngamaba: Department of Social Policy and Social Work, International Centre for Mental Health Social Research, University of York, York, UK. ORCID
  2. Maria Panagioti: NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  3. Christopher J Armitage: Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Health Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. Chris.armitage@manchester.ac.uk.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reducing income inequality is one possible approach to boost subjective well-being (SWB). Nevertheless, previous studies have reported positive, null and negative associations between income inequality and SWB.
OBJECTIVES: This study reports the first systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between income inequality and SWB, and seeks to understand the heterogeneity in the literature.
METHODS: This systematic review was conducted according to guidance (PRISMA and Cochrane Handbook) and searches (between January 1980 and October 2017) were carried out using Web of Science, Medline, Embase and PsycINFO databases.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine studies were included in the review, but poor data reporting meant that only 24 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The narrative analysis of 39 studies found negative, positive and null associations between income inequality and SWB. The meta-analysis confirmed these findings. The overall association between income inequality and SWB was almost zero and not statistically significant (pooled r = - 0.01, 95% CI - 0.08 to 0.06; Q = 563.10, I  = 95.74%, p < 0.001), suggesting no association between income inequality and SWB. Subgroup analyses showed that the association between income inequality and SWB was moderated by the country economic development (i.e. developed countries: r = - 0.06, 95% CI -0.10 to -0.02 versus developing countries: r = 0.16, 95% CI 0.09-0.23). The association between income inequality and SWB was not influenced by: (a) the measure used to assess SWB, (b) geographic region, or (c) the way in which income inequality was operationalised.
CONCLUSIONS: The association between income inequality and SWB is weak, complex and moderated by the country economic development.

Keywords

References

  1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Sep 21;107(38):16489-93 [PMID: 20823223]
  2. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995 Nov;69(5):851-64 [PMID: 7473035]
  3. Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9 [PMID: 19565683]
  4. Psychol Sci. 2015 Oct;26(10 ):1630-8 [PMID: 26338882]
  5. Public Health. 2015 Jun;129(6):655-66 [PMID: 25931439]
  6. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008 Jul;3(4):264-85 [PMID: 26158947]
  7. Am J Health Promot. 2011 Nov-Dec;26(2):109-15 [PMID: 22040392]
  8. Soc Sci Med. 2009 Aug;69(4):506-8 [PMID: 19535194]
  9. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Apr;78(4):764-71 [PMID: 10794379]
  10. Psychol Sci. 2011 Sep;22(9):1095-100 [PMID: 21841151]
  11. PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097 [PMID: 19621072]

MeSH Term

Humans
Income
Quality of Life
Social Welfare
Socioeconomic Factors

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0inequalitySWBincomeassociationstudiesreviewmeta-analysissystematic95%CIsubjectivewell-beingpositivenullnegativeassociationsincludedr = - 000610moderatedcountryeconomicdevelopmentcountries:-0IncomeBACKGROUND:ReducingonepossibleapproachboostNeverthelesspreviousreportedOBJECTIVES:studyreportsfirstrelationshipseeksunderstandheterogeneityliteratureMETHODS:conductedaccordingguidancePRISMACochraneHandbooksearchesJanuary1980October2017carriedusingWebScienceMedlineEmbasePsycINFOdatabasesRESULTS:Thirty-ninepoordatareportingmeant24narrativeanalysis39foundconfirmedfindingsoverallalmostzerostatisticallysignificantpooled01- 008Q = 563 = 9574%p < 0001suggestingSubgroupanalysesshowediedeveloped02versusdevelopingr = 01609-023influencedby:measureusedassessbgeographicregioncwaywhich incomeoperationalisedCONCLUSIONS:weak complexwell-being:HappinessLifesatisfactionRedistributionSubjective

Similar Articles

Cited By