Does the behavioural type-specific approach for type 2 diabetes promote changes in lifestyle? Protocol of a cluster randomised trial in Japan.

Misa Adachi, Kazue Yamaoka, Mariko Watanabe, Asuka Nemoto, Toshiro Tango
Author Information
  1. Misa Adachi: Nutrition Support Network LLC, Kanagawa, Japan.
  2. Kazue Yamaoka: Teikyo University Graduate School of Public Health, Tokyo, Japan.
  3. Mariko Watanabe: Showa Women's University, Tokyo, Japan.
  4. Asuka Nemoto: Teikyo University Graduate School of Public Health, Tokyo, Japan.
  5. Toshiro Tango: Teikyo University Graduate School of Public Health, Tokyo, Japan.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a significant problem, and lifestyle modifications including self-management are important. We have developed a structured individual-based lifestyle education (SILE) programme for T2D. With attention now being paid to techniques to change behaviour, we recently developed a behavioural type-specific SILE (BETSILE) programme. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the BETSILE programme compared with the SILE programme for reducing glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in patients with T2D and special behavioural types by a cluster randomised controlled trial.
METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a 6-month cluster randomised controlled trial with two intervention arms (BETSILE vs SILE) provided in a medical care setting by randomising registered dietitians for patients with T2D aged 20-79 years. Patients' behavioural types were classified into four types (BT1 to BT4) using an assessment sheet. We will perform independent trials for BT1 and BT2. The primary endpoint is a change from the baseline HbA1c value at 6 months. Differences between the SILE and BETSILE groups will be primarily analysed following the intention-to-treat principle. Crude and multivariate adjusted effects will be examined after adjusting for covariates, using a general linear mixed-effects model for continuous variables and a logistic regression mixed-effects model for dichotomous variables. Sample sizes needed were calculated assuming effect sizes of 0.42 and 0.33 for BT1 and BT2, respectively, an intraclass correlation of 0.02, a significance level of 5% (two-sided), a power of 80%, and equal allocation of clusters to the two arms, with each cluster having three BT1 patients for the SILE and BETSILE arms and six BT2 patients for the SILE and BETSILE arms. We will need 16 dietitians for each arm, and a total 288 patients will be required.
ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of Teikyo University (No.15-222). Findings will be disseminated widely through peer-reviewed publications, etc.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN 000023087; Pre-results.

Keywords

References

  1. Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:255-78 [PMID: 18154502]
  2. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Feb 5;158(3):200-7 [PMID: 23295957]
  3. Diabetes Care. 2002 Jul;25(7):1159-71 [PMID: 12087014]
  4. Lancet. 2004 May 15;363(9421):1589-97 [PMID: 15145632]
  5. Diabetes Care. 2005 Nov;28(11):2780-6 [PMID: 16249558]
  6. BMC Public Health. 2013 May 14;13:467 [PMID: 23672733]
  7. Metabolism. 2015 Feb;64(2):338-47 [PMID: 25467842]
  8. Ann Intern Med. 2015 Dec 1;163(11):848-60 [PMID: 26414227]
  9. BMJ. 2001 Feb 10;322(7282):355-7 [PMID: 11159665]
  10. Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 Jan;51(1):111-22 [PMID: 23473390]
  11. Diabetes Care. 2014 Jan;37 Suppl 1:S144-53 [PMID: 24357210]
  12. Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2010 Jun;57(6):475-85 [PMID: 20718205]
  13. BMC Public Health. 2010 Nov 30;10:742 [PMID: 21118514]

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Female
Glycated Hemoglobin
Health Behavior
Humans
Japan
Life Style
Linear Models
Male
Middle Aged
Research Design
Self Care
Young Adult

Chemicals

Glycated Hemoglobin A

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0SILEBETSILEwillpatientsT2DprogrammebehaviouralclusterarmsBT12diabeteslifestyletypesrandomisedtrialBT20self-managementdevelopededucationchangetype-specificHbA1ccontrolledANDtwodietitiansusingmixed-effectsmodelvariablessizestypeINTRODUCTION:Typesignificantproblemmodificationsincludingimportantstructuredindividual-basedattentionnowpaidtechniquesbehaviourrecentlyaimedevaluateeffectivenesscomparedreducingglycatedhaemoglobinspecialMETHODSANALYSIS:6-monthinterventionvsprovidedmedicalcaresettingrandomisingregisteredaged20-79yearsPatients'classifiedfourBT4assessmentsheetperformindependenttrialsprimaryendpointbaselinevalue6monthsDifferencesgroupsprimarilyanalysedfollowingintention-to-treatprincipleCrudemultivariateadjustedeffectsexaminedadjustingcovariatesgenerallinearcontinuouslogisticregressiondichotomousSampleneededcalculatedassumingeffect4233respectivelyintraclasscorrelation02significancelevel5%two-sidedpower80%equalallocationclustersthreesixneed16armtotal288requiredETHICSDISSEMINATION:studyapprovedMedicalEthicalCommitteeTeikyoUniversityNo15-222Findingsdisseminatedwidelypeer-reviewedpublicationsetcTRIALREGISTRATIONNUMBER:UMIN000023087Pre-resultsapproachpromotechangeslifestyle?ProtocolJapanbehavioralprogrammodification

Similar Articles

Cited By