Ultrasonography as a complementary diagnostic method for evaluating the skin of healthy cats.

Giordana Zanna, Eric Zini, Fabia Scarampella, Anna Attanasi, Silvana Arrighi, Edoardo Auriemma
Author Information
  1. Giordana Zanna: Istituto Veterinario di Novara, Strada Provinciale, 9 Granozzo con Monticello 28060, Novara, Italy 28060.
  2. Eric Zini: Istituto Veterinario di Novara, Strada Provinciale, 9 Granozzo con Monticello 28060, Novara, Italy 28060.
  3. Fabia Scarampella: Istituto Veterinario di Novara, Strada Provinciale, 9 Granozzo con Monticello 28060, Novara, Italy 28060.
  4. Anna Attanasi: Istituto Veterinario di Novara, Strada Provinciale, 9 Granozzo con Monticello 28060, Novara, Italy 28060.
  5. Silvana Arrighi: Istituto Veterinario di Novara, Strada Provinciale, 9 Granozzo con Monticello 28060, Novara, Italy 28060.
  6. Edoardo Auriemma: Istituto Veterinario di Novara, Strada Provinciale, 9 Granozzo con Monticello 28060, Novara, Italy 28060.

Abstract

Ultrasonography is not often used in feline dermatology. The purpose of this study was to assess the usefulness and applicability of ultrasonography for skin evaluation in 21 clinically healthy cats. Ultrasonographic examination was conducted in 4 cutaneous regions (frontal, dorsal neck, sacral, and abdominal) using an 18-MHz linear-sequential-array transducer. Findings were assessed using histomorphometric analysis of skin samples set as reference standards. Morphologic evaluation, thickness measurements, measurement variability, and comparison between regions and genders were carried out. The ultrasonographic pattern of feline skin was characterized by 3 distinct layers of different echogenicity and echostructure. Skin was thickest at the dorsal neck region and thinnest at the abdominal region. Skin at the frontal region and dorsal neck region was thicker in males. Variability was < 10% in all regions. No apparent correspondence was found between ultrasonographic and histometric measurements of skin thickness. Collectively, these findings suggest that ultrasonography is a simple, noninvasive, and reproducible technique that allows cutaneous layers to be identified and accurately measures skin thickness in cats.

References

  1. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2007 Aug;5(8):689-707 [PMID: 17659044]
  2. Aust Vet J. 1993 Sep;70(9):344-7 [PMID: 8240174]
  3. Am J Vet Res. 2005 Mar;66(3):500-5 [PMID: 15822596]
  4. J Invest Dermatol. 1979 Jan;72 (1):17-9 [PMID: 762445]
  5. Am J Vet Res. 2008 Sep;69(9):1148-52 [PMID: 18764685]
  6. An Bras Dermatol. 2016 May-Jun;91(3):262-73 [PMID: 27438191]
  7. Skin Res Technol. 2005 Nov;11(4):221-35 [PMID: 16221138]
  8. Skin Res Technol. 2017 Feb;23 (1):13-20 [PMID: 27273751]
  9. J Ultrasound Med. 2012 Jan;31(1):97-111 [PMID: 22215775]
  10. J Dermatol Sci. 2009 Sep;55(3):144-9 [PMID: 19574028]
  11. Am J Vet Res. 2004 Dec;65(12 ):1625-30 [PMID: 15631025]
  12. Skin Res Technol. 1995 May;1(2):74-80 [PMID: 27328386]
  13. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012 Sep;67(3):478-87 [PMID: 22285673]
  14. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2008 Mar;27(1):44-51 [PMID: 18486024]
  15. Am J Vet Res. 2012 Feb;73(2):220-6 [PMID: 22280381]
  16. Dermatoendocrinol. 2013 Apr 1;5(2):264-70 [PMID: 24194966]
  17. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2006 Mar-Apr;47(2):192-8 [PMID: 16553153]
  18. Am J Vet Res. 2006 Jun;67(6):985-91 [PMID: 16740091]
  19. Am J Vet Res. 1963 Sep;24:1018-29 [PMID: 14080512]
  20. Vet Dermatol. 2014 Jun;25(3):176-81, e44-5 [PMID: 24617973]
  21. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2013 Jun;34(3):177-95 [PMID: 23768885]
  22. Gend Med. 2007 Dec;4(4):308-28 [PMID: 18215723]
  23. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2014 Dec;12 (12 ):1083-98; quiz 1099 [PMID: 25482689]
  24. Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2008;16(3):126-9 [PMID: 18812060]

MeSH Term

Animals
Cats
Female
Male
Skin
Ultrasonography

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0skinregioncatsregionsdorsalneckthicknessUltrasonographyfelineultrasonographyevaluationhealthycutaneousfrontalabdominalusingmeasurementsultrasonographiclayersSkinoftenuseddermatologypurposestudyassessusefulnessapplicability21clinicallyUltrasonographicexaminationconducted4sacral18-MHzlinear-sequential-arraytransducerFindingsassessedhistomorphometricanalysissamplessetreferencestandardsMorphologicmeasurementvariabilitycomparisongenderscarriedpatterncharacterized3distinctdifferentechogenicityechostructurethickestthinnestthickermalesVariability<10%apparentcorrespondencefoundhistometricCollectivelyfindingssuggestsimplenoninvasivereproducibletechniqueallowsidentifiedaccuratelymeasurescomplementarydiagnosticmethodevaluating

Similar Articles

Cited By