Comparison between Central and Brachial Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Elderly Women and Men.

Bruno Bordin Pelazza, Sebastião Rodrigues Ferreira Filho
Author Information
  1. Bruno Bordin Pelazza: Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences, The Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil. ORCID
  2. Sebastião Rodrigues Ferreira Filho: Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences, The Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil. ORCID

Abstract

AIM: To compare the values of central and brachial systemic blood pressure (SBP) between women and men over 60 years of age with systemic arterial hypertension.
METHODS: This study was a quantitative, descriptive, cross-sectional study with elderly patients admitted to and selected from spontaneous and scheduled demand at basic health units in Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil, between March 2013 and March 2014. We included 69 study participants and compared central and brachial SBP using a Sphygmocor® XCEL device (AtCor Medical, Sydney, Australia).
RESULTS: Significant differences were found in the blood pressure values of the whole population in the central versus brachial systolic blood pressure (SP) [140(21) versus 153(23) mmHg] and in the central versus brachial pulse pressure (PP) [55(18) versus 70(18) mmHg]. Additionally, females exhibited higher blood pressure levels than males [central SP 144(23) versus 134(16) mmHg and brachial SP 161(26) versus 148(18) mmHg and central PP 62(17) versus 45(14) mmHg and brachial PP 80(21) versus 63(15) mmHg, resp.].
CONCLUSION: Elderly women exhibited higher blood pressure values than elderly Hypertensive men.

References

  1. Hypertension. 2014 Aug;64(2):259-65 [PMID: 24866142]
  2. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2014 Jun 25;10:389-97 [PMID: 25061313]
  3. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Oct 27;54(18):1730-4 [PMID: 19850215]
  4. Prz Menopauzalny. 2015 Sep;14(3):168-72 [PMID: 26528104]
  5. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Jan;75(1):79-92 [PMID: 22625662]
  6. Circ Heart Fail. 2013 Sep 1;6(5):944-52 [PMID: 23811963]
  7. Front Physiol. 2015 Oct 07;6:268 [PMID: 26500554]
  8. Eur Heart J. 2014 Jul;35(26):1719-25 [PMID: 24459197]
  9. Maturitas. 2010 Mar;65(3):237-43 [PMID: 20031345]
  10. Hypertension. 2008 Apr;51(4):848-55 [PMID: 18268136]
  11. Circulation. 2011 Feb 1;123(4):e18-e209 [PMID: 21160056]
  12. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2014;233(1):1-8 [PMID: 24727889]
  13. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 May;95(22):e3764 [PMID: 27258507]
  14. Int J Epidemiol. 2009 Jun;38(3):791-813 [PMID: 19351697]
  15. J Bras Nefrol. 2012 Jul-Sep;34(3):266-71 [PMID: 23099832]
  16. Hypertension. 2007 Jul;50(1):154-60 [PMID: 17562972]
  17. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2016 Sep;107(3 Suppl 3):0 [PMID: 27819379]
  18. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2011 Mar;9(2):244-57 [PMID: 20507277]
  19. Cardiol J. 2016;23(2):123-31 [PMID: 26412602]
  20. Hypertension. 2013 Dec;62(6):1005-7 [PMID: 24060887]
  21. Hypertension. 2005 May;45(5):907-13 [PMID: 15837826]
  22. Hypertension. 2001 Dec 1;38(6):1461-6 [PMID: 11751736]
  23. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014 Feb 15;7(2):421-5 [PMID: 24600499]
  24. BMC Womens Health. 2015 Aug 22;15:64 [PMID: 26296869]
  25. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2015 Jul;17(7):503-13 [PMID: 26010834]
  26. J Hypertens. 2014 Sep;32(9):1727-40 [PMID: 24937639]
  27. J Hypertens. 2001 Dec;19(12):2205-12 [PMID: 11725165]
  28. Hypertension. 2013 Dec;62(6):1138-45 [PMID: 24060891]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0versusbrachialpressurecentralbloodvaluesstudySPPP18 mmHgsystemicSBPwomenmenelderlyMarch2123 mmHg]exhibitedhigherElderlyAIM:compare60yearsagearterialhypertensionMETHODS:quantitativedescriptivecross-sectionalpatientsadmittedselectedspontaneousscheduleddemandbasichealthunitsUberlândiaMinasGeraisBrazil20132014included69participantscomparedusingSphygmocor®XCELdeviceAtCorMedicalSydneyAustraliaRESULTS:Significantdifferencesfoundwholepopulationsystolic[140153pulse[5570Additionallyfemaleslevelsmales[central14413416mmHg1612614862174514806315resp]CONCLUSION:hypertensiveComparisonCentralBrachialBloodPressureHypertensiveWomenMen

Similar Articles

Cited By (5)