Genetic variability in Italian populations of Drosophila suzukii.

Gabriella Tait, Silvia Vezzulli, Fabiana Sassù, Gloria Antonini, Antonio Biondi, Nuray Baser, Giorgia Sollai, Alessandro Cini, Lorenzo Tonina, Lino Ometto, Gianfranco Anfora
Author Information
  1. Gabriella Tait: Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, San Michele all'Adige, Trento, Italy. gabriella.tait@fmach.it. ORCID
  2. Silvia Vezzulli: Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, San Michele all'Adige, Trento, Italy.
  3. Fabiana Sassù: Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, FAO/IAEA, Wien, Austria.
  4. Gloria Antonini: "Charles Darwin" Department of Biology and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
  5. Antonio Biondi: Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, Catania University, Catania, Italy.
  6. Nuray Baser: Mediterranean Agronomic Institut, Valenzano, Bari, Italy.
  7. Giorgia Sollai: Department of Biomedical Science, Cagliari University, Cagliari, Italy.
  8. Alessandro Cini: Centre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, London College University, London, UK.
  9. Lorenzo Tonina: Department of Agronomy, Padova University, Padova, Italy.
  10. Lino Ometto: Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, San Michele all'Adige, Trento, Italy.
  11. Gianfranco Anfora: Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, San Michele all'Adige, Trento, Italy.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Drosophila suzukii is a highly destructive pest species, causing substantial economic losses in soft fruit production. To better understand migration patterns, gene flow and adaptation in invaded regions, we studied the genetic structure of D. suzukii collected across Italy, where it was first observed in 2008. In particular, we analysed 15 previously characterised Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) markers to estimate genetic differentiation across the genome of 278 flies collected from nine populations.
RESULTS: The nine populations showed high allelic diversity, mainly due to very high heterozygosity. The high Polymorphism Information Content (PIC) index values (ranging from 0.68 to 0.84) indicated good discrimination power for the markers. Negative fixation index (F ) values in seven of the populations indicated a low level of inbreeding, as suggested by the high number of alleles. STRUCTURE, Principal Coordinate and Neighbour Joining analysis also revealed that the Sicilian population was fairly divergent compared to other Italian populations. Moreover, migration was present across all populations, with the exception of the Sicilian one, confirming its isolation relative to the mainland.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study characterising the genetic structure of the invasive species D. suzukii in Italy. Our analysis showed extensive genetic homogeneity among D. suzukii collected in Italy. The relatively isolated Sicilian population suggests a largely human-mediated migration pattern, while the warm climate in this region allows the production of soft fruit, and the associated D. suzukii reproductive season occurring much earlier than on the rest of the peninsula.

Keywords

References

  1. Trends Ecol Evol. 1996 Oct;11(10):424-9 [PMID: 21237902]
  2. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2007 Spring;7(1):76-85 [PMID: 17417960]
  3. Genetics. 2003 Aug;164(4):1567-87 [PMID: 12930761]
  4. Pest Manag Sci. 2011 Nov;67(11):1352-7 [PMID: 21898759]
  5. Free Radic Biol Med. 2017 Apr;105:79-85 [PMID: 27880869]
  6. Genetics. 2000 Jun;155(2):945-59 [PMID: 10835412]
  7. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(9):e1836 [PMID: 23029593]
  8. Bioinformatics. 2009 Aug 1;25(15):1982-3 [PMID: 19420055]
  9. Nat Rev Genet. 2004 Jan;5(1):63-9 [PMID: 14666112]
  10. BMC Genomics. 2016 Jun 27;17 :475 [PMID: 27350531]
  11. Bioinformatics. 2012 Oct 1;28(19):2537-9 [PMID: 22820204]
  12. Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Mar;24(3):621-31 [PMID: 17150975]
  13. Mol Ecol Resour. 2009 Mar;9(2):498-504 [PMID: 21564679]
  14. Environ Entomol. 2011 Aug;40(4):844-54 [PMID: 22251685]
  15. Genome Biol Evol. 2016 Aug 16;8(8):2297-311 [PMID: 27435796]
  16. Genome Biol Evol. 2013;5(4):745-57 [PMID: 23501831]
  17. BMC Genomics. 2016 Jan 13;17:50 [PMID: 26758761]
  18. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 May 8;98(10):5446-51 [PMID: 11344292]
  19. Mol Ecol. 2005 Jul;14(8):2611-20 [PMID: 15969739]
  20. Genetics. 2003 Nov;165(3):1137-48 [PMID: 14668371]
  21. Evol Bioinform Online. 2007 Feb 23;1:47-50 [PMID: 19325852]
  22. Mol Ecol. 2007 Mar;16(5):1099-106 [PMID: 17305863]
  23. Mol Ecol. 1997 Nov;6(11):1059-73 [PMID: 9394464]
  24. Zookeys. 2015 Nov 26;(540):239-72 [PMID: 26798262]
  25. Mol Biol Evol. 2014 Dec;31(12):3148-63 [PMID: 25158796]
  26. Pest Manag Sci. 2011 Nov;67(11):1349-51 [PMID: 21990168]
  27. J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Sep;54(9):2348-53 [PMID: 27413190]
  28. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Jan 30;11(1):e0005332 [PMID: 28135274]
  29. J Hered. 2002 Jan-Feb;93(1):77-8 [PMID: 12011185]
  30. Environ Entomol. 2015 Oct;44(5):1449-53 [PMID: 26314019]
  31. Mol Biol Evol. 2003 Apr;20(4):660-2 [PMID: 12679547]
  32. Mol Biol Evol. 1998 Dec;15(12):1620-36 [PMID: 9866198]
  33. J Hered. 2004 Nov-Dec;95(6):536-9 [PMID: 15475402]
  34. G3 (Bethesda). 2016 Dec 7;6(12 ):4185-4196 [PMID: 27760794]

MeSH Term

Animals
Computational Biology
Drosophila
Female
Genetic Variation
Genetics, Population
Introduced Species
Italy
Male
Microsatellite Repeats
Phylogeny
Sequence Analysis, DNA

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0suzukiipopulationsgeneticDhighmigrationstructurecollectedacrossItalymarkersSicilianDrosophilaspeciessoftfruitproductionflowfirstSSRnineshowedindexvalues0indicatedanalysispopulationItalianBACKGROUND:highlydestructivepestcausingsubstantialeconomiclossesbetterunderstandpatternsgeneadaptationinvadedregionsstudiedobserved2008particularanalysed15previouslycharacterisedSimpleSequenceRepeatestimatedifferentiationgenome278fliesRESULTS:allelicdiversitymainlydueheterozygosityPolymorphismInformationContentPICranging6884gooddiscriminationpowerNegativefixationFsevenlowlevelinbreedingsuggestednumberallelesSTRUCTUREPrincipalCoordinateNeighbourJoiningalsorevealedfairlydivergentcomparedMoreoverpresentexceptiononeconfirmingisolationrelativemainlandCONCLUSIONS:studycharacterisinginvasiveextensivehomogeneityamongrelativelyisolatedsuggestslargelyhuman-mediatedpatternwarmclimateregionallowsassociatedreproductiveseasonoccurringmuchearlierrestpeninsulaGeneticvariabilityBottleneckGeneHumantradePopulationSpottedwingdrosophila

Similar Articles

Cited By