Hepatitis C virus genotypes in Saudi Arabia: a future prediction and laboratory profile.

Amen Bawazir, Fahad AlGusheri, Hoda Jradi, Mohammed AlBalwi, Abdel-Galil Abdel-Gader
Author Information
  1. Amen Bawazir: The King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC), Community and environmental Health,College of Public Health & Health Informatics. King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, 11481, Saudi Arabia. bawazir56@hotmail.com.
  2. Fahad AlGusheri: Division of Molecular Pathology and Genetics, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  3. Hoda Jradi: The King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC), Community and environmental Health,College of Public Health & Health Informatics. King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, 11481, Saudi Arabia.
  4. Mohammed AlBalwi: College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, 3660, Riyadh, 11481, Saudi Arabia.
  5. Abdel-Galil Abdel-Gader: Department of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes and subtypes are considered an important tool for epidemiological and clinical studies and valuable markers for disease progression and response to antiviral therapy. The aim of this study was to identify the prevalence of HCV genotypes and their relation to socio-demographic factors particularly age and sex, various biochemical profiles and viral load.
METHODS: The records (630) of Saudi patients positive for HCV (2007-2011) reported in the system of the Molecular Pathology Laboratory at a tertiary reference hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia were analyzed. Socio-demographic characteristics, liver biochemical profile, viral load and co-infection with HBV and HIV were retrieved from the hospital database. The associations of continuous and categorical variables with genotypes were analyzed.
RESULT: The overall mean age of the surveyed patients was 59 years ±0.5 years (21% were <50 years (p = 0.02). The rate of infection is lower in males than in females (47.6% vs. 52.4%). HCV genotype 4 was the most prevalent (60.7%), followed by genotype 1 (24.8%). However, genotype 1 and 3 were found more in males (29.7% vs. 20.3% and 6% vs. 2.1%, respectively, p = 0.001), while genotype 2 and 4 were more among females (4.8% vs. 2% and 68.5% vs. 52.3%, respectively). In addition, genotype 1 was found dominant in younger males (33.8%). Biochemical parameters across gender showed significant variation in particular for the ALT (p = 0.007). The mean viral load was significantly higher in genotype 1 than genotype 4 (4,757,532 vs. 1,435,012, p = <001). There is a very low overall percentage of co-infection of HBV or HIV in this study (around 2% for each).
CONCLUSION: Although HCV genotype 4 shows an overall high prevalence in this study, a clear decline in the rate of this genotype was also demonstrated in particular among the younger age group who displayed increasing trends toward the global trend of genotype 1, rather than genotype 4. This finding would be of clinical interest in relation to future planning of the therapy for HCV infected patient.

Keywords

References

  1. Hepatology. 2016 Feb;63(2):428-36 [PMID: 26524695]
  2. J Family Community Med. 2001 Sep;8(3):19-23 [PMID: 23008647]
  3. Hepat Mon. 2011 Jun;11(6):422-6 [PMID: 22087172]
  4. Asian J Transfus Sci. 2011 Jul;5(2):121-6 [PMID: 21897588]
  5. Liver Int. 2010 Mar;30(3):342-55 [PMID: 20015149]
  6. BMC Public Health. 2014 Jun 09;14:577 [PMID: 24912684]
  7. Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 21;7:44947 [PMID: 28322313]
  8. Hemodial Int. 2007 Jul;11(3):354-67 [PMID: 17576302]
  9. Hepat Med. 2017 Mar 01;9:7-11 [PMID: 28280398]
  10. J Hepatol. 2014 Nov;61(1 Suppl):S45-57 [PMID: 25086286]
  11. Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2017 May-Aug;5(2):110-115 [PMID: 30787767]
  12. BMC Res Notes. 2012 Oct 30;5:597 [PMID: 23111118]
  13. Mil Med. 2003 Jul;168(7):565-8 [PMID: 12901469]
  14. Int J Infect Dis. 2010 Feb;14(2):e115-20 [PMID: 19540786]
  15. New Microbiol. 1999 Jul;22(3):173-80 [PMID: 10423734]
  16. Saudi Med J. 2004 Dec;25(12):1935-8 [PMID: 15711670]
  17. Indian J Med Res. 2011 Mar;133:326-31 [PMID: 21441689]
  18. Saudi Med J. 2003 Jul;24 Suppl 2:S81-6 [PMID: 12897907]
  19. Int J Infect Dis. 2016 May;46:116-25 [PMID: 26996460]
  20. Ann Intern Med. 2012 Feb 21;156(4):271-8 [PMID: 22351712]
  21. Br J Biomed Sci. 2007;64(2):93-4 [PMID: 17633147]
  22. J Viral Hepat. 1995;2(6):293-6 [PMID: 8732175]
  23. Hepat Mon. 2016 Apr 19;16(4):e35558 [PMID: 27274353]
  24. Int J Family Med. 2014;2014:539670 [PMID: 25431668]
  25. J Med Virol. 2013 Oct;85(10):1712-23 [PMID: 23868809]
  26. J Hepatol. 2006 Oct;45(4):529-38 [PMID: 16879891]
  27. ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:719494 [PMID: 22629189]
  28. Int J Gen Med. 2014 Aug 12;7:401-10 [PMID: 25152628]
  29. East Mediterr Health J. 2011 Oct;17(10):784-93 [PMID: 22256414]
  30. Saudi Med J. 2004 Jan;25(1):26-33 [PMID: 14758374]
  31. BMC Infect Dis. 2012 Apr 11;12:86 [PMID: 22494445]
  32. J Med Virol. 2008 Apr;80(4):603-6 [PMID: 18297713]
  33. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2015 Feb;33 Suppl:161-3 [PMID: 25657142]
  34. Gastroenterology. 2011 Apr;140(4):1182-1188.e1 [PMID: 21184757]
  35. Saudi Med J. 2003 Jul;24 Suppl 2:S87-91 [PMID: 12897908]
  36. Clin Nephrol. 1997 Apr;47(4):256-62 [PMID: 9128793]
  37. Infect Genet Evol. 2017 Aug;52:82-88 [PMID: 28458032]
  38. World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Sep 14;22(34):7824-40 [PMID: 27678366]
  39. Saudi Med J. 2002 May;23(5):555-61 [PMID: 12070581]
  40. Saudi Med J. 2000 Oct;21(10):942-4 [PMID: 11369958]
  41. Clin Lab Haematol. 2004 Jun;26(3):225-8 [PMID: 15163322]
  42. Hepat Res Treat. 2016;2016:6592143 [PMID: 26942007]
  43. PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e29781 [PMID: 22253780]
  44. Hepatology. 2015 Jan;61(1):77-87 [PMID: 25069599]
  45. J Pak Med Assoc. 2010 Dec;60(12):987-90 [PMID: 21381547]
  46. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2011 Jul;22(4):712-6 [PMID: 21743215]
  47. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2012 Nov-Dec;18(6):349-57 [PMID: 23150019]
  48. Nepal J Epidemiol. 2015 Jun 01;5(2):488-93 [PMID: 26913208]

MeSH Term

Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Biomarkers
Cohort Studies
Coinfection
Disease Progression
Female
Genotype
HIV Infections
Hepacivirus
Hepatitis B
Hepatitis C, Chronic
Humans
Liver
Male
Middle Aged
Prevalence
Saudi Arabia
Sex Factors
Socioeconomic Factors
Viral Load

Chemicals

Biomarkers

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0genotype4HCVvs1genotypesloadHepatitisCvirusstudyageviralSaudioverallp = 0males8%clinicaltherapyprevalencerelationbiochemicalpatientshospitalanalyzedprofileco-infectionHBVHIVmeanratefemales6%527%found3%2respectivelyamong2%youngerparticularfutureBACKGROUND:subtypesconsideredimportanttoolepidemiologicalstudiesvaluablemarkersdiseaseprogressionresponseantiviralaimidentifysocio-demographicfactorsparticularlysexvariousprofilesMETHODS:records630positive2007-2011reportedsystemMolecularPathologyLaboratorytertiaryreferenceRiyadhArabiaSocio-demographiccharacteristicsliverretrieveddatabaseassociationscontinuouscategoricalvariablesRESULT:surveyed59 years±05 years21%<50 years02infectionlower474%prevalent60followed24However329201%001685%additiondominant33BiochemicalparametersacrossgendershowedsignificantvariationALT007significantlyhigher757532435012p = <001lowpercentagearoundCONCLUSION:AlthoughshowshighcleardeclinealsodemonstratedgroupdisplayedincreasingtrendstowardglobaltrendratherfindinginterestplanninginfectedpatientArabia:predictionlaboratoryBlooddonorsGenotypeLiverenzymeViral

Similar Articles

Cited By