Association between gene expression profile of the primary tumor and chemotherapy response of metastatic breast cancer.

Cemile Dilara Savci-Heijink, Hans Halfwerk, Jan Koster, Marc Joan Van de Vijver
Author Information
  1. Cemile Dilara Savci-Heijink: Department of Pathology, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, Amsterdam, AZ, Netherlands. c.d.savciheijink@amc.uva.nl.
  2. Hans Halfwerk: Department of Pathology, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, Amsterdam, AZ, Netherlands.
  3. Jan Koster: Department of Oncogenomics, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, Amsterdam, AZ, Netherlands.
  4. Marc Joan Van de Vijver: Department of Pathology, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, Amsterdam, AZ, Netherlands. m.j.vandevijver@amc.uva.nl.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To better predict the likelihood of response to chemotherapy, we have conducted a study comparing the gene expression patterns of primary tumours with their corresponding response to systemic chemotherapy in the metastatic setting.
METHODS: mRNA expression profiles of breast carcinomas of patients that later developed distant metastases were analyzed using supervised and non-supervised classification techniques to identify predictors of response to chemotherapy. The top differentially expressed genes between the responders and non-responders were identified and further explored. An independent dataset which was generated to predict response to neo-adjuvant CT was utilized for the purpose of validation. Response to chemotherapy was also correlated to the clinicopathologic characteristics, molecular subtypes, metastatic behavior and survival outcomes.
RESULTS: Anthracycline containing regimens were the most common first line treatment (58.4%), followed by non-anthracycline/non-taxane containing (25.8%) and taxane containing (15.7%) regimens. Response was achieved in 41.6% of the patients to the first line CT and in 21.8% to second line CT. Response was not found to be significantly correlated to tumour type, grade, lymph node status, ER and PR status. Patients with HER2+ tumours showed better response to anthracycline containing therapy (p: 0.002). Response to first and second line chemotherapy did not differ among gene expression based molecular subtypes (p: 0.236 and p: 0.20). Using supervised classification, a 14 gene response classifier was identified. This 14-gene predictor could successfully predict the likelihood of better response to first and second line CT (p: <.0001 and p: 0.761, respectively) in the training set. However, the predictive value of this gene set in data of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy could not be validated.
CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study revealing the relation between gene expression profiles of the primary tumours and their chemotherapy responsiveness in the metastatic setting. In contrast to the findings for neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment, there was no association of molecular subtype with response to chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. Using supervised classification, we identified a classifier of chemotherapy response; however, we could not validate this classifier using neoadjuvant response data.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: Non applicable. Subjects were retrospectively registered.

Keywords

References

  1. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008 Mar;108(2):183-90 [PMID: 17468948]
  2. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Apr;156(2):249-59 [PMID: 26965286]
  3. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Apr;150(3):547-57 [PMID: 25820592]
  4. N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 20;353(16):1659-72 [PMID: 16236737]
  5. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Oct 20;26(30):4891-8 [PMID: 18725649]
  6. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Jul;140(1):63-71 [PMID: 23828499]
  7. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2011 Dec;80(3):433-49 [PMID: 21330148]
  8. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jul 10;34(20):2359-65 [PMID: 27001590]
  9. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Mar 10;27(8):1160-7 [PMID: 19204204]
  10. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jun 7;102(23):8315-20 [PMID: 15914550]
  11. Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Apr 15;13(8):2329-34 [PMID: 17438091]
  12. N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 20;353(16):1673-84 [PMID: 16236738]
  13. Clin Breast Cancer. 2008 Jun;8(3):224-33 [PMID: 18650152]
  14. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jun 1;23(16):3676-85 [PMID: 15738535]
  15. Br J Cancer. 2004 Dec 13;91(12):2012-7 [PMID: 15558072]
  16. Cancer. 2004 Jan 1;100(1):44-52 [PMID: 14692023]
  17. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Mar 10;26(8):1275-81 [PMID: 18250347]
  18. JAMA. 2011 May 11;305(18):1873-81 [PMID: 21558518]
  19. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jul 1;27(19):3185-91 [PMID: 19364972]
  20. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2009;153:A948 [PMID: 20051182]
  21. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Nov 20;32(33):3744-52 [PMID: 25332249]
  22. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Sep 10;24(26):4236-44 [PMID: 16896004]
  23. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jul 10;28(20):3271-7 [PMID: 20498394]
  24. Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47 [PMID: 19097774]
  25. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Sep 1;24(25):4107-15 [PMID: 16908934]
  26. N Engl J Med. 1998 Oct 1;339(14):974-84 [PMID: 9753714]
  27. Eur J Cancer. 2011 Sep;47 Suppl 3:S38-47 [PMID: 21944023]
  28. Cancer. 2007 Sep 1;110(5):973-9 [PMID: 17647245]
  29. Breast. 2013 Jun;22(3):203-10 [PMID: 23601761]
  30. Ann Oncol. 2007 Feb;18(2):215-25 [PMID: 16831851]
  31. N Engl J Med. 2002 Dec 19;347(25):1999-2009 [PMID: 12490681]
  32. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Mar 1;29(7):859-67 [PMID: 21189395]
  33. Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Aug 15;11(16):5678-85 [PMID: 16115903]
  34. N Engl J Med. 2006 May 18;354(20):2103-11 [PMID: 16707747]
  35. Ann Oncol. 2007 Dec;18 Suppl 12:xii15-20 [PMID: 18083698]

Grants

  1. BreastCARE/Center for Translational Molecular Medicine

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
Breast Neoplasms
Computational Biology
Female
Gene Expression Profiling
Humans
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Grading
Neoplasm Metastasis
Neoplasm Staging
Prognosis
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Transcriptome
Treatment Outcome

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0responsechemotherapygeneexpressionmetastaticfirstlinep:CTResponsecontaining0betterpredictprimarytumourssettingsupervisedclassificationidentifiedmolecularsecondclassifierneoadjuvantlikelihoodstudyprofilesbreastpatientsusingcorrelatedsubtypesregimenstreatment8%statusUsingsetdataBACKGROUND:conductedcomparingpatternscorrespondingsystemicMETHODS:mRNAcarcinomaslaterdevelopeddistantmetastasesanalyzednon-supervisedtechniquesidentifypredictorstopdifferentiallyexpressedgenesrespondersnon-respondersexploredindependentdatasetgeneratedneo-adjuvantutilizedpurposevalidationalsoclinicopathologiccharacteristicsbehaviorsurvivaloutcomesRESULTS:Anthracyclinecommon584%followednon-anthracycline/non-taxane25taxane157%achieved416%21foundsignificantlytumourtypegradelymphnodeERPRPatientsHER2+showedanthracyclinetherapy002differamongbased236201414-genepredictorsuccessfully<0001761respectivelytrainingHoweverpredictivevaluevalidatedCONCLUSIONS:knowledgerevealingrelationresponsivenesscontrastfindingsassociationsubtypehowevervalidateTRIALREGISTRATION:NonapplicableSubjectsretrospectivelyregisteredAssociationprofiletumorcancerAdjuvantChemoresistantChemosensitiveNeoadjuvant

Similar Articles

Cited By