Volunteer patients and small groups contribute to abdominal examination's success.

Helen M Shields, Nielsen Q Fernandez-Becker, Sarah N Flier, Byron P Vaughn, Melissa H Tukey, Stephen R Pelletier, Douglas A Horst
Author Information
  1. Helen M Shields: Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
  2. Nielsen Q Fernandez-Becker: Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
  3. Sarah N Flier: Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
  4. Byron P Vaughn: Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
  5. Melissa H Tukey: Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
  6. Stephen R Pelletier: Center for Evaluation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  7. Douglas A Horst: Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prior to 2007, we taught the abdominal examination in a hospital based group to 40 students, at one hospital. We used volunteer patients, small groups, repetition, and required faculty development sessions. In 2007, our medical school changed its "Introduction to Physical Examination" session so that the entire class was to be taught in a geographically central session. Our hospital was selected to lead the abdominal examination portion of the session.
AIM: Our aim was to answer three questions. First, could we quadruple the recruitment of volunteer patients, and faculty? Second, was it volunteer patients, small groups, repetition, or faculty training that was most valued by the students? Third, would volunteer patients and/or faculty agree to participate a second time?
METHODS: A total of 43-46 patients and 43-46 faculty were recruited and 43-46 examining rooms were obtained for each of the 5 years of this study. Teachers were required to attend a 1-hour faculty development session. The class of about 170 students was divided into 43-46 groups each year. The teacher demonstrated the abdominal examination and each student practiced the examination on another student. Each student then repeated the full abdominal examination on a volunteer patient.
RESULTS: Over the 5-year time period (2008-2012), the abdominal examination ranked first among all organ systems' "Introductory Sessions". The abdominal examination ratings had the best mean score (1.35) on a Likert scale where 1 is excellent and 5 is poor. The students gave the most positive spontaneous comments to having volunteer patients, with small groups coming in as the second most appreciated educational element.
CONCLUSION: We successfully quadrupled the number of faculty, patients, and examining rooms and created a highly rated educational program as measured by anonymous student evaluations, patient and faculty participation, and the medical school's selecting the abdominal examination methods as an "Advanced Examination" for the Pathways Curriculum.

Keywords

References

  1. JAMA. 2016 Oct 4;316(13):1363-1364 [PMID: 27701664]
  2. Acad Med. 2006 Oct;81(10 Suppl):S95-7 [PMID: 17001147]
  3. Surgery. 1995 Aug;118(2):300-8; discussion 308-9 [PMID: 7638747]
  4. Acad Med. 2004 Jan;79(1):56-61 [PMID: 14690998]
  5. Acad Med. 2014 Dec;89(12):1623-9 [PMID: 25186816]
  6. Teach Learn Med. 2009 Jul;21(3):240-7 [PMID: 20183345]
  7. Acad Med. 2000 Apr;75(4):384-9 [PMID: 10893124]
  8. Med Teach. 2013 Sep;35(9):e1472-7 [PMID: 23570566]
  9. Teach Learn Med. 2001 Summer;13(3):161-6 [PMID: 11475659]
  10. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2010 Feb;39(2):150-1 [PMID: 20237739]
  11. BMC Med Educ. 2014 Apr 08;14:73 [PMID: 24712683]
  12. J Med Educ. 1981 Apr;56(4):301-6 [PMID: 7218294]
  13. Med Educ. 2005 Oct;39(10):1015-20 [PMID: 16178828]
  14. GMS J Med Educ. 2016 Feb 15;33(1):Doc4 [PMID: 26958652]
  15. Am J Surg. 2001 Apr;181(4):338-40 [PMID: 11438268]
  16. Acad Med. 1998 Feb;73(2):198-200 [PMID: 9484194]
  17. Med Educ. 2007 Sep;41(9):843-8 [PMID: 17696983]
  18. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2009 Oct;14(4):547-56 [PMID: 18941918]
  19. Med Educ. 2009 Feb;43(2):184-91 [PMID: 19161490]
  20. Acad Med. 2003 Jan;78(1):80-3 [PMID: 12525413]
  21. JAMA. 1983 Feb 25;249(8):1035-7 [PMID: 6823058]
  22. JAMA. 1976 Aug 16;236(7):852-5 [PMID: 947266]
  23. Acad Med. 2008 Jan;83(1):96-9 [PMID: 18162759]
  24. Fam Med. 2003 May;35(5):343-8 [PMID: 12772936]
  25. J Grad Med Educ. 2010 Jun;2(2):232-5 [PMID: 21975626]
  26. Teach Learn Med. 2004 Spring;16(2):171-4 [PMID: 15276894]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0abdominalexaminationpatientsfacultyvolunteergroupssmallsession43-46studenthospitalstudentsrepetitiondevelopment2007taughtrequiredmedicalExamination"classsecondexaminingrooms5patient1educationalBACKGROUND:Priorbasedgroup40oneusedsessionsschoolchanged"IntroductionPhysicalentiregeographicallycentralselectedleadportionAIM:aimanswerthreequestionsFirstquadruplerecruitmentfaculty?Secondtrainingvaluedstudents?Thirdand/oragreeparticipatetime?METHODS:totalrecruitedobtainedyearsstudyTeachersattend1-hour170dividedyearteacherdemonstratedpracticedanotherrepeatedfullRESULTS:5-yeartimeperiod2008-2012rankedfirstamongorgansystems'"IntroductorySessions"ratingsbestmeanscore35LikertscaleexcellentpoorgavepositivespontaneouscommentscomingappreciatedelementCONCLUSION:successfullyquadruplednumbercreatedhighlyratedprogrammeasuredanonymousevaluationsparticipationschool'sselectingmethods"AdvancedPathwaysCurriculumVolunteercontributeexamination'ssuccess

Similar Articles

Cited By