Female vervet monkeys fine-tune decisions on tolerance versus conflict in a communication network.

Christèle Borgeaud, Alessandra Schnider, Michael Krützen, Redouan Bshary
Author Information
  1. Christèle Borgeaud: Institute of Biology, University of Neuchâtel, Emile-Argand 11, 2009 Neuchâtel, Switzerland christele.borgeaud@gmail.com. ORCID
  2. Alessandra Schnider: Inkawu Vervet Project, Mawana Game Reserve, Swart Mfolozi, KwaZulu Natal, South Africa.
  3. Michael Krützen: Inkawu Vervet Project, Mawana Game Reserve, Swart Mfolozi, KwaZulu Natal, South Africa.
  4. Redouan Bshary: Institute of Biology, University of Neuchâtel, Emile-Argand 11, 2009 Neuchâtel, Switzerland. ORCID

Abstract

Group living promotes opportunities for both cooperation and competition. Selection on the ability to cope with such opposing social opportunities has been proposed as a driving force in the evolution of large brains in primates and other social species. However, we still know little about the degree of complexity involved in such social strategies. Here, we report advanced social strategies in wild vervet monkeys. Building on recent experimental evidence that subordinate females trade grooming for tolerance from higher-ranking individuals during foraging activities, we show that the audience composition strongly affects this trade. First, tolerance was lower if the audience contained individuals that outranked the subordinate partner, independently of audience size and kinship relationships. Second, we found a significant interaction between previous grooming and relative rank of bystanders: dominant subjects valued recent grooming by subordinates while intermediate ranked subjects valued the option to aggress subordinate partners in the presence of a dominant audience. Aggressors were also more likely to emit coalition recruitment calls if the audience contained individuals that outranked the subordinate partner. In conclusion, vervet monkeys include both recent grooming and knowledge about third-party relationships to make complex decisions when trading grooming for tolerance, leading to a finely balanced trade-off between reciprocation and opportunities to reinforce rank relationships.

Keywords

References

  1. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 Apr 29;362(1480):649-58 [PMID: 17301028]
  2. Curr Biol. 2007 Aug 7;17(15):1345-8 [PMID: 17683939]
  3. Curr Biol. 2011 Jul 12;21(13):1140-4 [PMID: 21700458]
  4. Anim Cogn. 2015 May;18(3):617-27 [PMID: 25539772]
  5. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Oct 26;96(22):12965-9 [PMID: 10536031]
  6. Science. 2003 Nov 14;302(5648):1234-6 [PMID: 14615544]
  7. Curr Biol. 2008 Mar 11;18(5):R189-90 [PMID: 18334188]
  8. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e32781 [PMID: 22807996]
  9. Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Jun 22;276(1665):2257-62 [PMID: 19324744]
  10. Trends Ecol Evol. 2012 Dec;27(12):679-88 [PMID: 23040461]
  11. Science. 2013 Apr 26;340(6131):483-5 [PMID: 23620053]
  12. Science. 1966 Jul 29;153(3735):501-6 [PMID: 5938775]
  13. PLoS One. 2008;3(6):e2431 [PMID: 22423311]
  14. Science. 2000 May 5;288(5467):850-2 [PMID: 10797005]
  15. Curr Biol. 2010 Aug 10;20(15):1359-61 [PMID: 20598541]
  16. Theor Popul Biol. 2006 Nov;70(3):300-21 [PMID: 16388833]
  17. J Theor Biol. 1964 Jul;7(1):17-52 [PMID: 5875340]
  18. Curr Biol. 2015 Nov 16;25(22):3011-6 [PMID: 26549255]
  19. Genet Res. 2007 Jun;89(3):135-53 [PMID: 17894908]
  20. Mol Ecol Resour. 2011 Jan;11(1):141-5 [PMID: 21429111]
  21. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jul 21;106(29):12007-12 [PMID: 19581578]
  22. Anim Behav. 1999 Jul;58(1):45-51 [PMID: 10413539]
  23. Behav Processes. 2003 May 28;63(1):53-61 [PMID: 12763268]
  24. Nature. 2004 Aug 12;430(7001):778-81 [PMID: 15306809]
  25. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58562 [PMID: 23520521]
  26. Commun Integr Biol. 2009 May;2(3):282-4 [PMID: 19641752]
  27. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jul 31;98(16):9177-80 [PMID: 11459936]
  28. J Theor Biol. 1964 Jul;7(1):1-16 [PMID: 5875341]
  29. Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Sep 22;271(1551):1917-22 [PMID: 15347514]
  30. Anim Behav. 1998 Apr;55(4):827-43 [PMID: 9632471]
  31. Folia Primatol (Basel). 1987;48(3-4):207-10 [PMID: 3443421]
  32. Genetics. 2006 Aug;173(4):2091-101 [PMID: 16783017]
  33. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Oct 23;104(43):17228-33 [PMID: 17942683]

MeSH Term

Animals
Chlorocebus aethiops
Dominance-Subordination
Female
Grooming

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0audiencegroomingsocialvervetmonkeyssubordinatetoleranceopportunitiesrecentindividualsrelationshipsstrategiestradecontainedoutrankedpartnerrankdominantsubjectsvalueddecisionsGrouplivingpromotescooperationcompetitionSelectionabilitycopeopposingproposeddrivingforceevolutionlargebrainsprimatesspeciesHoweverstillknowlittledegreecomplexityinvolvedreportadvancedwildBuildingexperimentalevidencefemaleshigher-rankingforagingactivitiesshowcompositionstronglyaffectsFirstlowerindependentlysizekinshipSecondfoundsignificantinteractionpreviousrelativebystanders:subordinatesintermediaterankedoptionaggresspartnerspresenceAggressorsalsolikelyemitcoalitionrecruitmentcallsconclusionincludeknowledgethird-partymakecomplextradingleadingfinelybalancedtrade-offreciprocationreinforceFemalefine-tuneversusconflictcommunicationnetworkMachiavellianintelligenceeffectcognitionstrategicbehaviour

Similar Articles

Cited By