A Genomic Survey of SCPP Family Genes in Fishes Provides Novel Insights into the Evolution of Fish Scales.

Yunyun Lv, Kazuhiko Kawasaki, Jia Li, Yanping Li, Chao Bian, Yu Huang, Xinxin You, Qiong Shi
Author Information
  1. Yunyun Lv: BGI Education Center, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518083, China. lvyunyun@genomics.cn.
  2. Kazuhiko Kawasaki: Department of Anthropology, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA. kuk2@psu.edu.
  3. Jia Li: Shenzhen Key Lab of Marine Genomics, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Molecular Breeding in Marine Economic Animals, BGI Academy of Marine Sciences, BGI Marine, BGI, Shenzhen 518083, China. lijia1@genomics.cn.
  4. Yanping Li: Shenzhen Key Lab of Marine Genomics, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Molecular Breeding in Marine Economic Animals, BGI Academy of Marine Sciences, BGI Marine, BGI, Shenzhen 518083, China. liyanping@genomics.cn.
  5. Chao Bian: Shenzhen Key Lab of Marine Genomics, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Molecular Breeding in Marine Economic Animals, BGI Academy of Marine Sciences, BGI Marine, BGI, Shenzhen 518083, China. bianchao@genomics.cn.
  6. Yu Huang: BGI Education Center, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518083, China. huangyu@genomics.cn.
  7. Xinxin You: BGI Education Center, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518083, China. youxinxin@genomics.cn.
  8. Qiong Shi: BGI Education Center, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518083, China. shiqiong@genomics.cn.

Abstract

The family of secretory calcium-binding phosphoproteins (SCPPs) have been considered vital to skeletal tissue mineralization. However, most previous studies focused on phylogenetically distant animals but not on those closely related species. Here we provide novel insights into the coevolution of genes and fish scales in 10 species from . According to their scale phenotypes, these fishes can be divided into three groups, i.e., scaled, sparsely scaled, and scaleless. We identified homologous genes in the genomes of these species and revealed an absence of some members in some genomes, suggesting an uneven evolutionary history of genes in fishes. In addition, most of these genes, with the exception of , individually form one or two gene cluster(s) on each corresponding genome. Furthermore, we constructed phylogenetic trees using maximum likelihood method to estimate their evolution. The phylogenetic topology mostly supports two subclasses in some species, such as , , , and , but not in the other examined fishes. By comparing the gene structures of recently reported candidate genes, and , for determining scale phenotypes, we found that the hypothesis is suitable for , but denied by , even though they are both sparsely scaled for cave adaptation. Thus, we conclude that, although different fish species display similar scale phenotypes, the underlying genetic changes however might be diverse. In summary, this paper accelerates the recognition of the family in teleosts for potential scale evolution.

Keywords

References

  1. Nat Methods. 2012 Jul 30;9(8):772 [PMID: 22847109]
  2. Nature. 2016 Dec 14;540(7633):395-399 [PMID: 27974754]
  3. BMC Bioinformatics. 2005 Feb 15;6:31 [PMID: 15713233]
  4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Dec 1;112(48):14918-23 [PMID: 26578810]
  5. Nature. 2016 Apr 18;533(7602):200-5 [PMID: 27088604]
  6. CSH Protoc. 2007 Jul 01;2007:pdb.top17 [PMID: 21357135]
  7. Mol Genet Genomics. 2014 Dec;289(6):1045-60 [PMID: 25092473]
  8. Nature. 2004 Oct 21;431(7011):946-57 [PMID: 15496914]
  9. Nat Commun. 2016 Jun 02;7:11757 [PMID: 27249958]
  10. BMC Genet. 2012 Mar 16;13:15 [PMID: 22424132]
  11. Nat Genet. 2006 Jan;38(1):107-11 [PMID: 16341223]
  12. Mol Biol Evol. 2016 Jul;33(7):1870-4 [PMID: 27004904]
  13. BMC Biol. 2016 Jan 04;14:1 [PMID: 26728391]
  14. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2006 May 15;306(3):295-316 [PMID: 16358265]
  15. Syst Biol. 2004 Oct;53(5):793-808 [PMID: 15545256]
  16. Dev Genes Evol. 2009 Mar;219(3):147-57 [PMID: 19255778]
  17. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;537:113-37 [PMID: 19378142]
  18. Nat Genet. 2016 Apr;48(4):427-37 [PMID: 26950095]
  19. Nature. 2007 Jun 7;447(7145):714-9 [PMID: 17554307]
  20. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2014 Sep;322(6):390-402 [PMID: 25243252]
  21. Nature. 2014 Jan 9;505(7482):174-9 [PMID: 24402279]
  22. Nat Commun. 2014 Oct 20;5:5307 [PMID: 25329095]
  23. J Dent Res. 2008 Jun;87(6):520-31 [PMID: 18502959]
  24. Gigascience. 2016 Sep 09;5(1):36 [PMID: 27609345]
  25. Bioessays. 2005 Sep;27(9):937-45 [PMID: 16108068]
  26. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Dec 13;102(50):18063-8 [PMID: 16332957]
  27. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Apr 1;100(7):4060-5 [PMID: 12646701]
  28. Cells Tissues Organs. 2007;186(1):7-24 [PMID: 17627116]
  29. Genome Res. 2010 Oct;20(10):1313-26 [PMID: 20651121]
  30. Syst Biol. 2010 May;59(3):307-21 [PMID: 20525638]

MeSH Term

Animal Scales
Animals
Calcium-Binding Proteins
Carps
Evolution, Molecular
Fish Proteins
Genome
Multigene Family
Phosphoproteins
Phylogeny

Chemicals

Calcium-Binding Proteins
Fish Proteins
Phosphoproteins

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0speciesgenesscalephenotypesfishesscaledgeneevolutionfamilyfishsparselygenomestwophylogeneticSCPPsecretorycalcium-bindingphosphoproteinsSCPPsconsideredvitalskeletaltissuemineralizationHoweverpreviousstudiesfocusedphylogeneticallydistantanimalscloselyrelatedprovidenovelinsightscoevolutionscales10AccordingcandividedthreegroupsiescalelessidentifiedhomologousrevealedabsencememberssuggestingunevenevolutionaryhistoryadditionexceptionindividuallyformoneclusterscorrespondinggenomeFurthermoreconstructedtreesusingmaximumlikelihoodmethodestimatetopologymostlysupportssubclassesexaminedcomparingstructuresrecentlyreportedcandidatedeterminingfoundhypothesissuitabledeniedeventhoughcaveadaptationThusconcludealthoughdifferentdisplaysimilarunderlyinggeneticchangeshowevermightdiversesummarypaperacceleratesrecognitionteleostspotentialGenomicSurveyFamilyGenesFishesProvidesNovelInsightsEvolutionFishScalescavefishmutation

Similar Articles

Cited By