Risk perceptions of public health and food safety hazards in poultry husbandry by citizens, poultry farmers and poultry veterinarians.

M van Asselt, P M Poortvliet, E D Ekkel, B Kemp, E N Stassen
Author Information
  1. M van Asselt: Aeres University of Applied Sciences Dronten, De Drieslag 4, 8251 JZ Dronten, the Netherlands.
  2. P M Poortvliet: Strategic Communication group, Sub department Communication, Philosophy, and Technology: Centre for Integrative Development, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 8130, 6700 EW Wageningen, the Netherlands.
  3. E D Ekkel: Aeres University of Applied Sciences Almere, Stadhuisplein 40, 1315 XA Almere, the Netherlands.
  4. B Kemp: Adaptation Physiology Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
  5. E N Stassen: Adaptation Physiology Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

Abstract

Differences in risk perceptions of public health and food safety hazards in various poultry husbandry systems by various stakeholder groups, may affect the acceptability of those husbandry systems. Therefore, the objective was to gain insight into risk perceptions of citizens, poultry farmers, and poultry veterinarians regarding food safety and public health hazards in poultry husbandry systems, and into factors explaining these risk perceptions. We surveyed risk perceptions of Campylobacter contamination of broiler meat, avian influenza introduction in laying hens, and altered dioxin levels in eggs for the most commonly used broiler and laying hen husbandry systems in Dutch citizens (n = 2,259), poultry farmers (n = 100), and poultry veterinarians (n = 41). Citizens perceived the risks of the three hazards in the indoor systems higher and in the outdoor systems lower than did the professionals. Citizens reported higher concerns regarding aspects reflecting underlying psychological factors of risk perception compared to professionals. Professionals indicated a relatively low level of personal control, which might imply risk denial. Of the socio-demographic characteristics, gender and childhood residence were associated with risk perceptions. The influence of other factors of risks perception are discussed. It is suggested that risk perceptions of all stakeholder groups are influenced by affect, stigma, and underlying values. To adapt current or new husbandry systems that can count on societal support, views of key stakeholders and multiple aspects such as animal welfare, public health, food safety, and underlying values should be considered integrally. When trade-offs, such as between animal welfare and public health have to be made, insight into underlying values might help to find consensus among stakeholders.

Keywords

References

  1. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2013 Jan;7(1):6-10 [PMID: 22376126]
  2. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2006 Oct;50(10):908-14 [PMID: 16676378]
  3. Avian Dis. 2006 Jun;50(2):196-200 [PMID: 16863067]
  4. Sci Total Environ. 2009 Jul 15;407(15):4419-29 [PMID: 19155055]
  5. Risk Anal. 1994 Oct;14(5):799-806 [PMID: 7800864]
  6. Int J Food Microbiol. 2013 Apr 1;162(3):226-30 [PMID: 23454812]
  7. Animal. 2011 Aug;5(9):1458-66 [PMID: 22440292]
  8. Environ Int. 2004 Sep;30(7):923-32 [PMID: 15196840]
  9. Lancet. 2004 Feb 21;363(9409):587-93 [PMID: 14987882]
  10. Food Addit Contam. 2006 Nov;23(11):1109-22 [PMID: 17071513]
  11. Prev Vet Med. 2004 Jan 30;62(1):35-49 [PMID: 15154683]
  12. Poult Sci. 2007 Sep;86(9):2042-8 [PMID: 17704396]
  13. Risk Anal. 2000 Feb;20(1):1-11 [PMID: 10795334]
  14. Prev Vet Med. 2013 Aug 1;111(1-2):100-11 [PMID: 23706344]
  15. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2001 Oct;33(4):269-74 [PMID: 11559399]
  16. Int J Food Microbiol. 2005 Apr 1;99(3):245-55 [PMID: 15808359]
  17. Sci Total Environ. 2009 Jul 15;407(15):4403-10 [PMID: 19095291]
  18. J Food Prot. 2009 Dec;72(12):2629-37 [PMID: 20003752]
  19. Food Chem Toxicol. 2012 Jan;50(1):67-76 [PMID: 21683114]
  20. Appetite. 2009 Aug;53(1):123-6 [PMID: 19433122]
  21. Risk Anal. 1999 Aug;19(4):689-701 [PMID: 10765431]
  22. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2009;35(1):1-22 [PMID: 19514906]
  23. J Psychol. 1975 Sep;91(1):93-114 [PMID: 28136248]
  24. Appetite. 2006 Nov;47(3):324-32 [PMID: 16828198]
  25. Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Dec;57(11):1600-6 [PMID: 24014733]
  26. Science. 1987 Apr 17;236(4799):280-5 [PMID: 3563507]
  27. Risk Anal. 1996 Aug;16(4):487-500 [PMID: 8819341]
  28. Talanta. 2004 Aug 8;63(5):1273-6 [PMID: 18969558]
  29. Poult Sci. 2016 Mar;95(3):715-25 [PMID: 26574025]
  30. J Behav Med. 1982 Dec;5(4):441-60 [PMID: 7154065]
  31. Appetite. 2003 Oct;41(2):111-21 [PMID: 14550309]
  32. Risk Anal. 2001 Apr;21(2):341-56 [PMID: 11414542]
  33. Poult Sci. 2016 Dec 1;95(12 ):2971-2978 [PMID: 27486253]
  34. Poult Sci. 2011 May;90(5):1088-95 [PMID: 21489959]

MeSH Term

Animal Husbandry
Animals
Campylobacter
Campylobacter Infections
Chickens
Dioxins
Eggs
Farmers
Female
Food Microbiology
Food Safety
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Influenza in Birds
Meat
Netherlands
Perception
Poultry Diseases
Public Health
Public Opinion
Risk
Veterinarians

Chemicals

Dioxins

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0poultryriskperceptionshusbandrysystemspublichealthfoodsafetyhazardsunderlyingperceptionstakeholdercitizensfarmersveterinariansfactorsn=valuesvariousgroupsaffectinsightregardingbroilerlayingCitizensriskshigherprofessionalsaspectsmightstakeholdersanimalwelfareDifferencesmayacceptabilityThereforeobjectivegainexplainingsurveyedCampylobactercontaminationmeatavianinfluenzaintroductionhensaltereddioxinlevelseggscommonlyusedhenDutch225910041perceivedthreeindooroutdoorlowerreportedconcernsreflectingpsychologicalcomparedProfessionalsindicatedrelativelylowlevelpersonalcontrolimplydenialsocio-demographiccharacteristicsgenderchildhoodresidenceassociatedinfluencediscussedsuggestedinfluencedstigmaadaptcurrentnewcancountsocietalsupportviewskeymultipleconsideredintegrallytrade-offsmadehelpfindconsensusamongRisk

Similar Articles

Cited By (7)