Behavioral Evidence for Enhanced Processing of the Minor Component of Binary Odor Mixtures in Larval .

Yi-Chun Chen, Dushyant Mishra, Sebastian Gläß, Bertram Gerber
Author Information
  1. Yi-Chun Chen: Abteilung Genetik von Lernen und Gedächtnis, Leibniz Institut für Neurobiologie, Magdeburg, Germany.
  2. Dushyant Mishra: Genetik und Neurobiologie, Biozentrum, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
  3. Sebastian Gläß: Abteilung Genetik von Lernen und Gedächtnis, Leibniz Institut für Neurobiologie, Magdeburg, Germany.
  4. Bertram Gerber: Abteilung Genetik von Lernen und Gedächtnis, Leibniz Institut für Neurobiologie, Magdeburg, Germany.

Abstract

A fundamental problem in deciding between mutually exclusive options is that the decision needs to be categorical although the properties of the options often differ but in grade. We developed an experimental handle to study this aspect of behavior organization. Larval were trained such that in one set of animals odor A was rewarded, but odor B was not (A+/B), whereas a second set of animals was trained reciprocally (A/B+). We then measured the preference of the larvae either for A, or for B, or for "morphed" mixtures of A and B, that is for mixtures differing in the ratio of the two components. As expected, the larvae showed higher preference when only the previously rewarded odor was presented than when only the previously unrewarded odor was presented. For mixtures of A and B that differed in the ratio of the two components, the major component dominated preference behavior-but it dominated than expected from a linear relationship between mixture ratio and preference behavior. This suggests that a minor component can have an enhanced impact in a mixture, relative to such a linear expectation. The current paradigm may prove useful in understanding how nervous systems generate discrete outputs in the face of inputs that differ only gradually.

Keywords

References

  1. Nature. 2010 May 6;465(7294):47-52 [PMID: 20393466]
  2. Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Oct 7;276(1672):3413-20 [PMID: 19586944]
  3. J Exp Biol. 2014 Jun 15;217(Pt 12):2071-7 [PMID: 24920835]
  4. J Exp Biol. 2000 Apr;203(Pt 8):1351-64 [PMID: 10729283]
  5. Learn Mem. 2003 May-Jun;10(3):217-25 [PMID: 12773586]
  6. Neuron. 2010 Apr 29;66(2):287-99 [PMID: 20435004]
  7. Nature. 2001 Aug 16;412(6848):733-6 [PMID: 11507640]
  8. Chem Senses. 2011 Mar;36(3):223-35 [PMID: 21227902]
  9. Chem Senses. 2011 Mar;36(3):237-49 [PMID: 21227903]
  10. Psychol Rev. 1994 Oct;101(4):587-607 [PMID: 7984708]
  11. J Neurosci. 2007 Oct 31;27(44):11966-77 [PMID: 17978037]
  12. Behav Processes. 2008 Mar;77(3):413-27; discussion 451-3 [PMID: 18031954]
  13. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 22;108(12 ):5075-80 [PMID: 21383179]
  14. J Neurosci. 2011 Aug 17;31(33):11772-85 [PMID: 21849538]
  15. J Neurosci. 2014 Jan 29;34(5):1819-37 [PMID: 24478363]
  16. Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Mar 7;282(1802):null [PMID: 25652840]
  17. J Neurogenet. 2010 Sep;24(3):168-75 [PMID: 20807100]
  18. Chem Senses. 2011 Sep;36(7):613-21 [PMID: 21486995]
  19. J Neurosci. 2009 Aug 19;29(33):10191-202 [PMID: 19692594]
  20. Behav Brain Res. 2003 Oct 17;145(1-2):161-9 [PMID: 14529814]
  21. Chem Senses. 2013 May;38(4):293-304 [PMID: 23315042]
  22. J Comput Neurosci. 2012 Apr;32(2):197-212 [PMID: 21698405]
  23. J Exp Biol. 2013 Mar 15;216(Pt 6):939-51 [PMID: 23447663]
  24. Q J Exp Psychol B. 1995 Feb;48(1):67-83 [PMID: 7740125]
  25. Physiol Behav. 1997 Jul;62(1):169-74 [PMID: 9226358]
  26. J Exp Biol. 1999 Jul;202 (Pt 13):1839-54 [PMID: 10359686]
  27. J Comp Physiol A. 1997 Feb;180(2):123-35 [PMID: 9011065]
  28. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2011 Sep;96(2):339-52 [PMID: 21742045]
  29. J Neurosci. 2004 Jul 21;24(29):6611-20 [PMID: 15269273]
  30. J Exp Biol. 2013 May 1;216(Pt 9):1552-60 [PMID: 23596280]
  31. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24300 [PMID: 21931676]
  32. Learn Mem. 2003 May-Jun;10 (3):199-208 [PMID: 12773584]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0odorBpreferencemixturesratiooptionsdifferbehaviorLarvaltrainedsetanimalsrewardedlarvaetwocomponentsexpectedpreviouslypresentedcomponentdominatedlinearmixturefundamentalproblemdecidingmutuallyexclusivedecisionneedscategoricalalthoughpropertiesoftengradedevelopedexperimentalhandlestudyaspectorganizationoneA+/BwhereassecondreciprocallyA/B+measuredeither"morphed"differingshowedhigherunrewardeddifferedmajorbehavior-butrelationshipsuggestsminorcanenhancedimpactrelativeexpectationcurrentparadigmmayproveusefulunderstandingnervoussystemsgeneratediscreteoutputsfaceinputsgraduallyBehavioralEvidenceEnhancedProcessingMinorComponentBinaryOdorMixturescompoundconditioningdecision-makinglearningmemoryperception

Similar Articles

Cited By