Sleep Architecture in Children With Common Phenotype of Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Peter Durdik, Anna Sujanska, Stanislava Suroviakova, Melania Evangelisti, Peter Banovcin, Maria Pia Villa
Author Information
  1. Peter Durdik: Comenius University in Bratislava, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Pediatric Department, Slovakia.
  2. Anna Sujanska: Comenius University in Bratislava, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Pediatric Department, Slovakia.
  3. Stanislava Suroviakova: Comenius University in Bratislava, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Pediatric Department, Slovakia.
  4. Melania Evangelisti: Neuroscience, Mental Health and Sense Organs Department, Pediatric Sleep Disease Centre, S. Andrea Hospital, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  5. Peter Banovcin: Comenius University in Bratislava, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Pediatric Department, Slovakia.
  6. Maria Pia Villa: Neuroscience, Mental Health and Sense Organs Department, Pediatric Sleep Disease Centre, S. Andrea Hospital, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES: In children, the effect of the common phenotype of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) on sleep architecture is not adequately documented. The aim of this study was to evaluate sleep architecture in a pediatric population with the common phenotype of OSA.
METHODS: The prospective cross-sectional study included 116 children in the age range of 3 to 8 years with suspected OSA and 51 healthy children. All children underwent standard overnight in-laboratory video polysomnography. Patients with obstructive apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 1, adenotonsillar hypertrophy, a long face, narrow palate or minor malocclusions, and no obesity were defined as a common phenotype. Polysomnographic parameters of sleep architecture and sleep clinical record were statistically analyzed according to OSA and its severity.
RESULTS: In total, 94 pediatric patients (59.60% male) received the diagnosis of the common phenotype of OSA (mean age of 5.25 ± 1.39 years). A lower percentage of stage N3 sleep (27.70 ± 3.76% versus 31.02 ± 4.23%; < .05), a greater percentage of stage N1 sleep (8.40 ± 3.98% versus 2.68 ± 3.02%, < .01), reduced deep sleep efficiency (46.01 ± 4.98% versus 50.25 ± 3.72%; < .05) and longer sleep latency (18.40 ± 8.48 minutes versus 9.90 ± 11.55 minutes, < .01) were found in children with the common phenotype of OSA compared with healthy controls. No significant differences were found in total sleep time, sleep efficiency, and percentage of stage R sleep and stage N2 sleep between groups and in sleep stage distribution and cyclization.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the most common phenotype of pediatric OSA has a negative effect on the structure of sleep, but other clinical studies are needed to confirm this result.

Keywords

References

  1. Sleep Med. 2014 Mar;15(3):303-8 [PMID: 24461933]
  2. J Clin Sleep Med. 2009 Dec 15;5(6):519-24 [PMID: 20465017]
  3. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2016 Mar 1;96(8):601-4 [PMID: 26932851]
  4. Pediatr Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2012;18(3):112-5 [PMID: 23146790]
  5. Sleep Breath. 2016 Mar;20(1):321-9 [PMID: 26564170]
  6. Chest. 2014 Oct;146(4):982-990 [PMID: 24831859]
  7. Br J Anaesth. 2000 Sep;85(3):354-8 [PMID: 11103173]
  8. J Int Med Res. 2008 Sep-Oct;36(5):906-13 [PMID: 18831883]
  9. Eur Respir J. 2013 Jun;41(6):1355-61 [PMID: 23018902]
  10. Eur Respir J. 2016 Jan;47(1):69-94 [PMID: 26541535]
  11. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2011 Jun;5(3):425-40 [PMID: 21702663]
  12. J Clin Sleep Med. 2012 Oct 15;8(5):597-619 [PMID: 23066376]
  13. BMJ. 2010 Apr 14;340:c1918 [PMID: 20392770]
  14. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 Aug;162(2 Pt 1):682-6 [PMID: 10934106]
  15. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012;2012:4660-3 [PMID: 23366967]
  16. J Sleep Res. 2009 Dec;18(4):411-4 [PMID: 19682242]
  17. Sleep Breath. 2016 May;20(2):845-51 [PMID: 26711131]
  18. J Diabetes. 2015 Jan;7(1):10-5 [PMID: 25695111]
  19. Sleep Med. 2011 Oct;12(9):880-6 [PMID: 21930428]
  20. Pediatrics. 2012 Sep;130(3):576-84 [PMID: 22926173]
  21. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001 Jun;112(6):984-91 [PMID: 11377255]
  22. Sleep. 2004 Mar 15;27(2):274-8 [PMID: 15124722]

MeSH Term

Adenoids
Child
Child, Preschool
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Humans
Hypertrophy
Male
Palate
Palatine Tonsil
Phenotype
Polysomnography
Prospective Studies
Sleep Apnea, Obstructive
Time

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0sleep±commonphenotypeOSAchildren3stagearchitectureversus<obstructivepediatric8percentage01effectapneastudyageyearshealthy1clinicaltotal254054098%efficiencyminutesfoundSleepSTUDYOBJECTIVES:adequatelydocumentedaimevaluatepopulationMETHODS:prospectivecross-sectionalincluded116rangesuspected51underwentstandardovernightin-laboratoryvideopolysomnographyPatientsapnea-hypopneaindexadenotonsillarhypertrophylongfacenarrowpalateminormalocclusionsobesitydefinedPolysomnographicparametersrecordstatisticallyanalyzedaccordingseverityRESULTS:94patients5960%malereceiveddiagnosismean539lowerN3277076%310223%greaterN126802%reduceddeep465072%longerlatency18489901155comparedcontrolssignificantdifferencestimeRN2groupsdistributioncyclizationCONCLUSIONS:findingssuggestnegativestructurestudiesneededconfirmresultArchitectureChildrenCommonPhenotypeObstructiveApnea

Similar Articles

Cited By