Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis.

Albine Moser, Irene Korstjens
Author Information
  1. Albine Moser: a Faculty of Health Care, Research Centre Autonomy and Participation of Chronically Ill People , Zuyd University of Applied Sciences , Heerlen , The Netherlands.
  2. Irene Korstjens: c Faculty of Health Care, Research Centre for Midwifery Science , Zuyd University of Applied Sciences , Maastricht , The Netherlands. ORCID

Abstract

In the course of our supervisory work over the years, we have noticed that qualitative research tends to evoke a lot of questions and worries, so-called frequently asked questions (FAQs). This series of four articles intends to provide novice researchers with practical guidance for conducting high-quality qualitative research in primary care. By 'novice' we mean Master's students and junior researchers, as well as experienced quantitative researchers who are engaging in qualitative research for the first time. This series addresses their questions and provides researchers, readers, reviewers and editors with references to criteria and tools for judging the quality of qualitative research papers. The second article focused on context, research questions and designs, and referred to publications for further reading. This third article addresses FAQs about sampling, data collection and analysis. The data collection plan needs to be broadly defined and open at first, and become flexible during data collection. Sampling strategies should be chosen in such a way that they yield rich information and are consistent with the methodological approach used. Data saturation determines sample size and will be different for each study. The most commonly used data collection methods are participant observation, face-to-face in-depth interviews and focus group discussions. Analyses in ethnographic, phenomenological, grounded theory, and content analysis studies yield different narrative findings: a detailed description of a culture, the essence of the lived experience, a theory, and a descriptive summary, respectively. The fourth and final article will focus on trustworthiness and publishing qualitative research.

Keywords

References

  1. J Adv Nurs. 2016 Dec;72 (12 ):2954-2965 [PMID: 27221824]
  2. Eur J Gen Pract. 2017 Dec;23 (1):274-279 [PMID: 29185826]
  3. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Mar 25;14:42 [PMID: 24669751]
  4. Eur J Gen Pract. 2017 Dec;23 (1):271-273 [PMID: 29185831]
  5. J Adv Nurs. 2008 Apr;62(1):107-15 [PMID: 18352969]
  6. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010 Dec;16(6):1262-8 [PMID: 20727062]
  7. Eur J Gen Pract. 2017 Dec 5;:1-5 [PMID: 29202616]
  8. Res Nurs Health. 2000 Aug;23(4):334-40 [PMID: 10940958]
  9. Int J Nurs Stud. 2006 May;43(4):417-27 [PMID: 16112674]

MeSH Term

Data Collection
Grounded Theory
Humans
Primary Health Care
Qualitative Research
Research Design
Research Personnel
Sample Size

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0qualitativeresearchdatacollectionquestionsresearchersanalysisarticleFAQsseriesguidancefirstaddressesdesignssamplingSamplingyieldusedwilldifferentmethodsfocustheorycoursesupervisoryworkyearsnoticedtendsevokelotworriesso-calledfrequentlyaskedfourarticlesintendsprovidenovicepracticalconductinghigh-qualityprimarycare'novice'meanMaster'sstudentsjuniorwellexperiencedquantitativeengagingtimeprovidesreadersreviewerseditorsreferencescriteriatoolsjudgingqualitypaperssecondfocusedcontextreferredpublicationsreadingthirdplanneedsbroadlydefinedopenbecomeflexiblestrategieschosenwayrichinformationconsistentmethodologicalapproachDatasaturationdeterminessamplesizestudycommonlyparticipantobservationface-to-facein-depthinterviewsgroupdiscussionsAnalysesethnographicphenomenologicalgroundedcontentstudiesnarrativefindings:detaileddescriptioncultureessencelivedexperiencedescriptivesummaryrespectivelyfourthfinaltrustworthinesspublishingSeries:PracticalPart3:Generalpractice/familymedicinegeneral

Similar Articles

Cited By