Potentially traumatic events, coping strategies and associations with mental health and well-being measures among conflict-affected youth in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo.

Megan Cherewick, Shannon Doocy, Wietse Tol, Gilbert Burnham, Nancy Glass
Author Information
  1. Megan Cherewick: Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21205 USA.
  2. Shannon Doocy: Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21205 USA.
  3. Wietse Tol: Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway, HH 863, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA.
  4. Gilbert Burnham: Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21205 USA.
  5. Nancy Glass: Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins Center for Global Health, 615 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21205 USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Youth in conflict and post-conflict settings are exposed to a variety of potentially-traumatic events that impact their mental health and well-being. The purposes of this study were to examine coping strategies among conflict-affected youth exposed to potentially-traumatic events and the relationship to psychological symptoms and well-being in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).
METHODS: A total of 434 male and female youth (ages 10-15 years) completed data collection with a trained Congolese interviewer. The survey instrument included measures of exposure to potentially traumatic events, an adapted coping strategies checklist, and measures of psychosocial distress and well-being. Exploratory factor analyses was used to identify coping strategies and Hierarchical regression was used to assess how coping strategies were associated with psychological symptoms including internalizing and externalizing problems and well-being outcomes including prosocial behavior and self-esteem.
RESULTS: Exploratory Factor analysis suggested four coping strategies; problem-focused, emotion-focused, avoidance and faith-based strategies. Problem-focused coping strategies were associated with greater internalizing and externalizing problems and lower prosocial behavior in both boys and girls. However, when problem-focused strategies were used with emotion-focused coping strategies, the result was fewer internalizing problems in girls and fewer externalizing problems in boys and girls. Emotion-focused, avoidance and faith based strategies were associated with better self-esteem.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest a complex relationship between coping strategies, psychological symptoms and well-being and contradict evidence that problem-focused strategies benefit mental health while emotion-focused strategies harm mental health, particularly in conflict and post-conflict settings. The results suggest coping flexibility, or use of multiple coping strategies may be particularly useful to improving mental health and well-being. The need for context specific understandings of coping strategies in conflict-affected populations is highlighted by the results of the study.

Keywords

References

  1. Confl Health. 2015 Nov 17;9:35 [PMID: 26579210]
  2. Child Dev. 2010 Jul-Aug;81(4):1096-113 [PMID: 20636684]
  3. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2013 Apr;54(4):348-66 [PMID: 23215898]
  4. JAMA. 1993 Aug 4;270(5):581-6 [PMID: 8331755]
  5. J Clin Psychol. 2003 Jan;59(1):9-25 [PMID: 12508328]
  6. Stress Health. 2015 Feb;31(1):83-8 [PMID: 24130163]
  7. Am Psychol. 1989 Mar;44(3):513-24 [PMID: 2648906]
  8. J Clin Psychol. 2003 Jan;59(1):27-40 [PMID: 12508329]
  9. Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:745-74 [PMID: 14744233]
  10. Am J Psychiatry. 1984 May;141(5):645-50 [PMID: 6711684]
  11. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2004 Dec;7(4):223-40 [PMID: 15648277]
  12. Child Dev. 1991 Jun;62(3):583-99 [PMID: 1914627]
  13. Psychiatry Res. 2015 Dec 15;230(2):137-42 [PMID: 26342281]
  14. Psychol Bull. 2001 Jan;127(1):87-127 [PMID: 11271757]
  15. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2015 Jan;85(1):72-9 [PMID: 25642655]
  16. Soc Sci Med. 2012 Jun;74(12):2005-11 [PMID: 22483708]
  17. JAMA. 2007 Aug 1;298(5):555-9 [PMID: 17666676]
  18. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2009 Jun;50(6):707-17 [PMID: 19076261]
  19. Soc Sci Med. 2002 Oct;55(8):1351-71 [PMID: 12231014]
  20. Qual Health Res. 2004 Nov;14(9):1177-96 [PMID: 15448294]
  21. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 Jun;163(6):525-30 [PMID: 19487608]
  22. Adolescence. 2007 Summer;42(166):287-310 [PMID: 17849937]
  23. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2012 Sep 1;34(3):405-414 [PMID: 23002323]
  24. PLoS One. 2014 Nov 24;9(11):e111708 [PMID: 25419743]
  25. Br J Soc Psychol. 1990 Mar;29 ( Pt 1):67-77 [PMID: 2322783]
  26. Glob Public Health. 2015 Jan;10(1):55-70 [PMID: 25363537]
  27. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1994 Apr;62(2):324-32 [PMID: 8201070]
  28. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993 Jun;61(3):462-7 [PMID: 8326048]
  29. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2013 Apr;54(4):445-60 [PMID: 23414226]
  30. Annu Rev Psychol. 2007;58:119-44 [PMID: 16903804]
  31. Crisis. 2013 Jan 1;34(4):242-50 [PMID: 23357219]
  32. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2014 Jun;23(2):142-60 [PMID: 24478113]
  33. J Genet Psychol. 1993 Jun;154(2):259-67 [PMID: 8366334]
  34. Psychol Bull. 1990 Mar;107(2):238-46 [PMID: 2320703]
  35. Psychol Bull. 2003 Mar;129(2):216-69 [PMID: 12696840]
  36. Science. 1990 Dec 21;250(4988):1678-83 [PMID: 2270481]
  37. Trials. 2015 Nov 11;16:516 [PMID: 26558829]
  38. Br J Educ Psychol. 2005 Dec;75(Pt 4):661-71 [PMID: 16318684]
  39. J Pediatr Psychol. 1988 Dec;13(4):555-74 [PMID: 3216277]
  40. J Clin Psychol. 2000 Apr;56(4):519-43 [PMID: 10775045]
  41. Am Psychol. 2001 Mar;56(3):227-38 [PMID: 11315249]
  42. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011 Apr;50(4):340-8, 348.e1-2 [PMID: 21421174]
  43. Child Dev. 1994 Dec;65(6):1744-63 [PMID: 7859552]
  44. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2009 Jul;22(4):413-32 [PMID: 19343597]
  45. Psychol Bull. 2014 Nov;140(6):1582-607 [PMID: 25222637]
  46. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2004 Mar;45(3):533-42 [PMID: 15055372]
  47. J Sch Psychol. 2012 Apr;50(2):167-93 [PMID: 22386119]
  48. Behav Res Ther. 2006 Apr;44(4):585-99 [PMID: 15998508]
  49. Torture. 2012;22(1):11-23 [PMID: 23086002]
  50. JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Aug;169(8):761-9 [PMID: 26111066]
  51. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2004 Jan;45(1):41-62 [PMID: 14959802]
  52. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2007 Mar;41(3):282-8 [PMID: 17464710]
  53. Psychol Methods. 2007 Jun;12(2):205-18 [PMID: 17563173]
  54. Int J Group Psychother. 2007 Jul;57(3):319-45 [PMID: 17661546]
  55. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2013 Nov;54(11):1231-41 [PMID: 23738530]

Grants

  1. L60 MD000605/NIMHD NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0strategiescopingwell-beinghealthmentaleventsproblemsconflict-affectedyouthpsychologicalsymptomsmeasuresusedassociatedinternalizingexternalizingproblem-focusedemotion-focusedgirlsresultsconflictpost-conflictsettingsexposedpotentially-traumaticstudyamongrelationshipDemocraticRepublicCongotraumaticExploratoryincludingprosocialbehaviorself-esteemavoidanceboysfewersuggestparticularlyBACKGROUND:YouthvarietyimpactpurposesexamineDRCMETHODS:total434malefemaleages10-15yearscompleteddatacollectiontrainedCongoleseinterviewersurveyinstrumentincludedexposurepotentiallyadaptedchecklistpsychosocialdistressfactoranalysesidentifyHierarchicalregressionassessoutcomesRESULTS:Factoranalysissuggestedfourfaith-basedProblem-focusedgreaterlowerHoweverresultEmotion-focusedfaithbasedbetterCONCLUSION:complexcontradictevidencebenefitharmflexibilityusemultiplemayusefulimprovingneedcontextspecificunderstandingspopulationshighlightedPotentiallyassociationsEasternConflictCopingMentalResilienceTraumaWell-being

Similar Articles

Cited By